InvestSMART

Miners should continue to exploit profit lode

IF LAST spring taught us anything, it was that even the mining sector is vulnerable to the market miseries unfolding abroad.
By · 2 Feb 2012
By ·
2 Feb 2012
comments Comments
IF LAST spring taught us anything, it was that even the mining sector is vulnerable to the market miseries unfolding abroad.

But despite that sudden collapse in commodity prices the value of some resources fell by close to 40 per cent over September and October investors can confidently expect the big resource stocks to make gains this year.

A steady resurgence in commodity prices since November has not been fully reflected in the share prices of the big diversified miners such as BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Both have a strong suit in iron ore, a weak spot in aluminium, and big growth plans for copper.

Both should benefit from continuing strong demand for coal and iron ore from Chinese customers, even if the steel scene is milder than this time last year. But despite BHP's greater diversification, canny investors have a slight preference for Rio in the medium term, based on

a couple of factors.

First there is a belief

that Rio's Pilbara ports are more easily expanded that BHP's, meaning Rio will

find it easier to increase its exposure to the iron ore

cash cow in the decade ahead.

BHP, meanwhile, faces a massive capital spend to build its outer harbour at Port Hedland estimated to be more than $22 billion and will have to commit an even bigger sum to develop Olympic Dam in South Australia.

Rio's spend on growth is not quite as big, meaning it should enjoy more free cash flow in the next couple of years, and will have more capacity for share buyback programs and the like.

Then there's BHP's recent venture into shale gas, which due to depressed gas prices in the US, may be an investment that takes years to pay off.

Yet both the big miners remain a safer bet than Fortescue Metals Group, which is entirely leveraged to the iron ore price.

With Chinese buyers paying about $US140 ($A131) for something that costs about $50 to produce, exposure to iron ore should continue to serve Fortescue well for many years to come.

For this reason most analysts consider the company a good bet in the short term at least.

Yet it's possible that last year's prices above $180 a tonne will never again be matched. More and more supply is coming into the market.

Fortescue will be among those increasing supply, but its growth targets are as ever highly ambitious in terms of cost and schedule.

Two key players in Fortescue's six-year run founder Andrew Forrest and Manhattan-based investors Leucadia National have scaled back their involvement in recent times.

Mr Forrest has moved out of the chief executive's office and into a less hands-on role in the chairman's lounge. Leucadia, meanwhile, has been selling down a stake that once stood at 9 per cent. That stake is now below 1 per cent after another big sell-down on January 25.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Commodity prices have staged a steady resurgence since November that hasn’t been fully reflected in the share prices of big diversified miners. Both BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto have strong iron ore exposure and should benefit from ongoing Chinese demand for coal and iron ore, so many investors expect gains in the big resource stocks this year—while still acknowledging the sector’s vulnerability to overseas market shocks.

Both are diversified, but the article notes a slight medium‑term preference for Rio Tinto because its Pilbara ports are considered easier to expand, which could let Rio increase exposure to its iron‑ore ‘cash cow’. BHP faces very large capital spending (an outer harbour at Port Hedland estimated at more than $22 billion and further development at Olympic Dam), which may limit near‑term free cash flow compared with Rio.

BHP’s venture into shale gas is highlighted as a longer‑term, potentially slow‑paying investment because gas prices in the US are depressed. That means returns from the shale gas move may take years to materialise, adding a longer‑term risk/uncertainty for investors.

Fortescue is largely exposed to iron ore, so its performance tracks iron‑ore prices closely. With Chinese buyers paying about US$140 (A$131) while production costs are around US$50, analysts see Fortescue as a good short‑term bet—but its fortunes depend heavily on iron‑ore price levels and supply dynamics.

The article warns that last year’s prices above US$180 a tonne may never be matched again because more supply is entering the market. That increased supply could temper future price peaks and affect highly leveraged producers like Fortescue, even as demand from China remains strong.

Easier expansion of Pilbara ports (a strength cited for Rio Tinto) can allow a miner to boost iron‑ore output without massive new capital works, supporting stronger free cash flow. More free cash flow gives companies scope for share buybacks and other shareholder returns, which can be attractive to investors.

Fortescue’s founder Andrew Forrest has moved out of the chief executive’s office into a less hands‑on chairman role, and Manhattan‑based investor Leucadia National has been selling down its stake—from about 9% to below 1% after a big sell‑down on January 25. These moves may be relevant to investors assessing governance and investor confidence.

The article suggests that big diversified miners like BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto are generally safer bets than highly leveraged peers such as Fortescue, because diversification cushions them against swings. However, the sector remains vulnerable to global market turmoil, so investors should weigh both upside from recovering commodity prices and the risks of external shocks.