The Institute of International Finance advises thriving countries to steer clear of austerity.
A POWERFUL global banking group has warned governments around the world not to cut spending too hard at a time when Europe's economic recovery remains fragile.
The Institute of International Finance, which counts ANZ chief executive Mike Smith as a director, also called for policymakers to slow their efforts in introducing banking regulation.
The IIF, which has more than 450 member institutions, was the body that led painstaking negotiations on behalf of private-sector creditors during Greece's debt restructuring last month.
While not directly citing Australia, its comments on ''austerity overload'' are likely to be seized on by business groups to argue that Canberra needs to reconsider its commitment to returning the budget to surplus next financial year.
''The emphasis so far on fiscal austerity, while to a degree necessary for the countries facing market funding difficulties, is excessive when carried out across the board,'' IIF chief Charles Dallara said in a letter to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
The tighter spending by eurozone governments ''has already contributed to a steep contraction in domestic demand in the euro area as a whole'', Mr Dallara said.
For countries with fiscal headroom, including a surplus, it was important to move beyond budget discipline ''so as to avoid the risk of an austerity overload''.
In urging policymakers to slow the introduction of new banking regulation, the IIF said toughening capital standards beyond the requirements of the new global banking rules known as Basel 3 would restrict the sector's ability to provide businesses and households with the credit needed to lift economic growth.
In Australia, ANZ's Mr Smith has led calls for regulators to slow efforts to tighten bank rules, warning that the changes were likely to permanently increase the cost of banking for customers and reduce the flow of credit.
But local bank regulators have resisted such calls. Last month the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority said it would stick to the shape of the Basel 3 reforms as well as its accelerated timetable for the introduction of the new rules from the start of next year.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What warning did the Institute of International Finance (IIF) give about austerity and economic recovery?
The IIF warned governments not to cut spending too hard while Europe’s recovery remains fragile, saying widespread fiscal austerity can deepen contractions in domestic demand and risk an "austerity overload" that harms growth.
How could austerity measures affect everyday investors and markets?
According to the article, tight government spending in regions like the eurozone has already reduced domestic demand, which can slow economic growth, hurt corporate earnings and lower investment returns — risks everyday investors should monitor.
What does 'austerity overload' mean and which countries should be cautious?
"Austerity overload" refers to excessive across‑the‑board spending cuts that drag on growth; the IIF said countries with fiscal headroom or budget surpluses should avoid such overload to prevent damaging their recoveries.
What is the IIF's view on new banking regulation and Basel III for investors to know?
The IIF urged policymakers to slow the introduction of new bank rules, warning that tightening capital standards beyond Basel III could restrict banks' ability to lend — a development that could reduce credit availability for businesses and households and influence economic growth relevant to investors.
How is ANZ and its CEO Mike Smith connected to the IIF’s position on bank rules?
The IIF counts ANZ CEO Mike Smith as a director, and in Australia Mr Smith has publicly called for regulators to slow tighter bank rules, arguing such changes could permanently raise banking costs for customers and limit credit flow.
What stance have Australian regulators taken on Basel III and tighter bank rules?
The article says the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) resisted calls to slow reforms, stating it will stick to the shape of the Basel III reforms and its accelerated timetable to introduce the new rules from the start of next year.
Why should investors care if capital standards for banks are tightened beyond Basel III?
Tighter capital standards beyond Basel III could make banks hold more capital and lend less, which can reduce credit to companies and households, potentially slowing economic growth and affecting corporate profits and investment returns.
What notable role has the IIF played in recent international debt talks that investors might find relevant?
The IIF, which has more than 450 member institutions, led private‑sector creditor negotiations during Greece’s recent debt restructuring, demonstrating its influence in cross‑border financial discussions that can affect sovereign and market outcomes.