Former coal buddies in royalties battle
Mr Higgins, who used to run Mr Tinkler's maintenance business in Muswellbrook, is taking civil action in the Brisbane Supreme Court to gain access to the financial records of Oceltip, in which both are directors and shareholders.
The case includes allegations that Mr Tinkler has diverted funds from Oceltip's bank account without Mr Higgins' knowledge or approval.
Oceltip was set up in 2007 after the then friends famously sold or invested everything they had to scrape together a $1 million deposit to buy a neglected coal tenement at Middlemount, in Central Queensland, for $30 million, through Mr Tinkler's company Custom Mining.
Mr Higgins, who ran the drilling team at Middlemount and spent his evenings with Mr Tinkler at the local pub, had a 20 per cent share in the company that was sold in about a year to Macarthur Coal for $65 million in cash and shares valued at up to $210 million.
After the deal Mr Higgins walked away, from the business and the friendship, with a reported $53 million in cash from an initial investment of about $200,000. Mr Tinkler went on to sell his Macarthur shares months later for $442 million.
But before selling Custom Mining the pair, who no longer speak, struck a coal royalty agreement that would bind them for the life of the Middlemount mine.
Their Newcastle-based company Oceltip, 75 per cent owned by Mr Tinkler's wife Rebecca and 25 per cent by Mr Higgins' wife Ruth, receives $1 for every tonne of coal mined from Middlemount, with payments due every quarter.
Oceltip's quarterly royalty payments started in September 2009 at $3685 and grew to $484,519 in March and $519,355 in June this year.
Neither man has spoken publicly about what severed their solid friendship, with this legal battle the first insight into the relationship.
An affidavit submitted to the court on November 29 by Mr Higgins' lawyer David Schwarz details months of correspondence between the former friends' legal teams and frustration by Mr Higgins over missing bank statements, no company ledger and allegations some of the royalty payments were diverted to one of Mr Tinkler's private companies.
Mr Tinkler's Sydney-based public relations spokesman refused to comment yesterday and Mr Higgins did not respond. The matter is listed to be heard in the Brisbane Supreme Court on Friday.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The dispute is a civil action in the Brisbane Supreme Court in which Matthew Higgins is seeking access to Oceltip's financial records and alleges some royalty payments from the Middlemount coal deal were diverted without his knowledge or approval.
Oceltip is the Newcastle-based company set up by the former business partners; it receives $1 for every tonne of coal mined from Middlemount, with quarterly royalty payments that started at $3,685 in September 2009 and rose to $484,519 in March and $519,355 in June.
In 2007 they pooled funds to buy a Middlemount tenement for $30 million through Tinkler’s company Custom Mining; about a year later the business was sold to Macarthur Coal for $65 million in cash plus shares worth up to $210 million, with Higgins holding a 20% stake and reportedly receiving about $53 million.
According to an affidavit, Higgins’ legal team says there have been missing bank statements, no company ledger produced and allegations that some royalty payments were diverted to one of Tinkler’s private companies.
Oceltip is reported as being 75% owned by Rebecca Tinkler (Nathan Tinkler’s wife) and 25% by Ruth Higgins (Matthew Higgins’ wife), and both Nathan Tinkler and Matthew Higgins are named as directors and shareholders.
The matter is listed to be heard in the Brisbane Supreme Court on Friday, where Higgins is seeking access to Oceltip’s books and records.
Tinkler’s Sydney-based public relations spokesman refused to comment and Higgins did not respond to requests, so neither man has spoken publicly about what ended their friendship or the details of the dispute.
Investors should pay attention to disputes over royalty agreements, transparency of company financial records, and legal claims of diverted funds—issues highlighted in the Oceltip case involving Tinkler and Higgins that can affect company value and shareholder outcomes.

