Fletcher outlook down after picking up Crane

FLETCHER Building's $515 million share wipeout yesterday shows the difference between warning that conditions are tough - and then translating that into profit forecasts.

Fletcher, which lost its position as New Zealand's second-largest listed company to Contact Energy as a result of the 12 per cent fall in its stock to $A5.43, did not really shift its position a long way from the outlook statements that it has been giving in the past two months.

It has been saying for some time that it expected at best modest improvements in Australia and New Zealand, that Europe and North America were likely to be flat, and that Asia was the only growth market.

Yesterday's statement to the market that sparked the sell-off, reportedly its worst one-day dip in a decade and a half, said that even those modest expectations for NZ and Australia were now off the table for this financial year. The group said that it now expects earnings to be 10 per cent lower than 2010's $NZ166 million ($A130 million) for the December half year, and is hopeful that in the full year net profit will be ''similar'' to the $NZ359 million unveiled two months ago.

Unfortunately for Fletcher, a ''no growth'' earnings outcome this financial year is not the same as a ''flat'' result because it spent $A800 million in January buying out complementary building products company Crane Group. In a normal year, Crane was producing about $A40 million of profit, so even if Fletcher did nothing to lower costs after its acquisition, and plunder the benefits of blending the businesses, investors could reasonably have expected a result closer to $NZ400 million this year.

So Fletcher has effectively spent $A800 million to get a smaller profit. Worse still, there is just a chance that the harsh treatment meted out by the market is not only a function of it losing its growth premium.

Barely two weeks ago, Fletcher did a series of presentations to analysts and investors on the state of its businesses, but clearly did not raise the red flag at that time.

Insider reckons that Fletcher's share price since then indicates that while analysts may not have come out of those briefings with a view ''buy with your ears pinned back'', they certainly did not leave overly negative. Fletcher's stock actually gained from slightly under $A6 a share to about $6.20 before yesterday.

In Fletcher's defence, the briefings were on September 28 so it would not have ruled off its books for the first quarter until a few days after that, and presumably the profit warning reflects the result of reviewing those numbers and forward orders.

While markets are absolutely brutal to stocks like Fletcher that lose their gloss, Insider would not be surprised to see the stock regain some of the lost ground in the absence of any broader market retreat - if for no other reason than that the attention spans of short sellers and those who exploit volatility are notoriously short.

Perpetual motionFETED, and then ill-fated, funds manager Peter Morgan is still a fan of the brand and investment principles where he made his name, Perpetual.

Morgan, who these days invests his own money after an industry sabbatical, spoke at an informal lunch yesterday with a variety of market animals in the offices of ASX-listed and Otto Buttula-chaired Investorfirst Securities.

He is less enamoured of the board and management at Perpetual these days, thinking it is missing opportunities to properly build on its reputation and customer loyalty.

To Insider's thinking, it is a market oddity that none of the big four banks that have been rushing into building wealth management businesses have touched on Perpetual. The only tentative offer so far has been from a private equity fund, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, and that was rebuffed at the end of last year. Since then, and amid its cack-handed handling of the speculation surrounding the future of Morgan's successor, John Sevior, Perpetual has slumped from around $1.7 billion in market value to as low as $900 million two weeks ago. It is only now back to $1.1 billion, which is about where it bottomed in the bad days of the GFC in early 2009.

Morgan also made an excellent point about the funds management industry - that unlike the public companies that institutional investors are content to criticise for their salary excesses, the salaries and bonuses handed out in the industry of managing other people's funds are rarely revealed. Meanwhile, the value-seeking Morgan reckons that, unlike what many might think, the current sharemarket abounds in value - particularly if you look well outside the over-shopped Top 200 companies.

Insider cannot help but agree that with the majority of funds managers and algorithmic traders spending most of their time trying to at least replicate if not beat the performance of the S&P/ASX 200 index, there are higher yielding options elsewhere.

Austock settlementAUSTOCK yesterday announced that it had settled out of court with the liquidators of what remains of Eddy Groves' ABC Learning Centres for an amount that Insider suspects was probably less than half the $2.7 million that was being claimed.

The claim against Austock from ABC, or ZYX Learning Centres as it it has been cutely renamed on the way to the knacker's yard, related to so-called preferential payments in the last six months before its collapse.

Clearly both sides thought a commercial deal was better than lots of lawyers' fees. Given that the liquidators have to file accounts with the corporate watchdog to disclose receipts and expenses, Insider wonders how the confidentiality clause will be applied.

And if the amount was not material to Austock, it will barely make a ripple on the sea of red ink left behind by ZYX. The most recent report totted up $2.75 billion in claims from banks, unsecured creditors, once-were-shareholders and employees that are unlikely ever to be fully satisfied.