InvestSMART

The article you are trying to access does not exist, however, here are some articles you may be interested in.

Asset mix does the trick for industry super funds

INDUSTRY superannuation funds have outperformed retail funds over the past 10 years and they have largely done so by being more active in their asset allocations. They are more prepared to change their asset allocation as market conditions change, which has paid off for their members over the long term.
By · 24 Apr 2012
By ·
24 Apr 2012
comments Comments
INDUSTRY superannuation funds have outperformed retail funds over the past 10 years and they have largely done so by being more active in their asset allocations. They are more prepared to change their asset allocation as market conditions change, which has paid off for their members over the long term.

"The numbers say the not-for-profit funds have got it right over the past decade," Jeff Bresnahan, the founder of SuperRatings, said. Data from SuperRatings shows non-profit industry funds achieved an average annual return to March 31 this year of 5.86 per cent over the past 10 years, compared with a return of 3.56 per cent by retail funds over the same period, a difference of 2.3 percentage points.

The figures are based on a "balanced" investment option, where most people have their super.

Mr Bresnahan said the main reason for the difference in returns was asset allocation. Industry super funds are more aggressive in their asset allocation with bigger exposure to "alternative" assets, which include unlisted investments such as infrastructure, private equity and hedge funds.

The data shows industry funds have a 17 per cent exposure to alternative investments whereas retail funds have just 5 per cent. Retail funds have an exposure of 8 per cent to property, mostly to listed property trusts, while for industry funds this is 11 per cent, mostly through direct investments.

The returns are reported by SuperRatings net of fees. After asset allocation, the second factor for the better performance of industry funds was their lower administration fees, Mr Bresnahan said.

Low-cost retail funds are making their way into the market but their market share is still fairly small. "We see the gap [in administration fees] closing but it's still significant at about 40 to 50 basis points," Mr Bresnahan said.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

According to SuperRatings, non-profit industry super funds returned an average 5.86% per year over the past 10 years (to March 31), compared with 3.56% per year for retail funds — a difference of about 2.3 percentage points on a balanced investment option.

SuperRatings founder Jeff Bresnahan says the main reasons are different asset allocation and lower administration fees. Industry funds have been more active and aggressive in shifting asset mixes and have larger allocations to alternative and direct investments, which has boosted long‑term returns.

Asset allocation is how a fund divides money across shares, bonds, property, alternatives and other assets. Industry funds have been more prepared to change allocations as markets change and have higher exposure to alternatives and direct property, which helped lift returns over the past decade.

The article describes alternatives as unlisted investments such as infrastructure, private equity and hedge funds. SuperRatings’ data shows industry funds have about 17% exposure to alternatives, while retail funds hold around 5%.

Retail funds have roughly 8% exposure to property, mostly through listed property trusts. Industry funds have about 11% exposure, with a larger share invested via direct property investments.

Yes. The returns reported by SuperRatings in the article are net of fees, so they reflect performance after management and administration costs are taken into account.

Low‑cost retail funds are entering the market, but their market share remains fairly small. SuperRatings notes the administration fee gap is still significant at around 40 to 50 basis points, so the difference hasn’t closed yet.

The article suggests paying attention to a fund’s asset allocation (especially exposure to alternatives and direct assets) and administration fees. For many people in a balanced investment option, those two factors helped explain why industry funds outperformed retail funds over the past decade.