InvestSMART

Warning to Rudd over leadership

Key independent Tony Windsor says there would and probably should be a quick election if Labor changes leaders.
By · 7 Feb 2012
By ·
7 Feb 2012
comments Comments
Key independent Tony Windsor says there would and probably should be a quick election if Labor changes leaders.

KEY independent Tony Windsor has fired a warning shot across Kevin Rudd's bows, saying there would and probably should be a quick election if Labor changes leaders.

Mr Windsor said last night that if Labor went into meltdown over its leadership, it might be time ''that the Australian people are asked to make a decision'', rather than the independents renegotiating with the new PM.

Both Mr Windsor and fellow country independent Rob Oakeshott are strongly backing Ms Gillard, complicating the push from Mr Rudd, who has suffered a setback with yesterday's Age/Nielsen poll boosting the Prime Minister's stocks. The minority Labor government depends on their support. Both revealed they had been sounded out last year about a change of Labor leader.

Mr Oakeshott, asked on Sky whether Mr Rudd or any of his supporters had spoken to him about a leadership change, replied ''Yes, at different times'', canvassing where he would go ''only in very general terms''. Later he told The Age he did not think the sounding out was from ''Rudd's praetorian guard''.

Mr Windsor said he had had a contact from someone outside Parliament, probably 12 months ago, who was touting for Mr Rudd. ''But that died within days and I think this one has as well,'' he told the ABC.

The Gillard forces were relieved by yesterday's Age/Nielsen poll showing Labor's primary vote rising to 33 per cent, and Ms Gillard ahead of Tony Abbott as preferred PM for the first time in nine months. The polling has calmed the caucus for the moment.

The Rudd camp insisted Ms Gillard's poll boost was unlikely to give her a longer term reprieve - unless there was unanticipated continued improvement. The talk now is that any move would wait until after the March 24 Queensland election.

Mr Oakeshott and Mr Windsor differed on whether a change to Mr Rudd would mean a quick election. While Mr Windsor predicted that it would, he also insisted the change would not happen.

He would not see himself throwing his support behind Tony Abbott if things did change. ''But maybe if this thing becomes a real loose cannon, a meltdown, then maybe that's time the Australian people are asked to make a decision, rather than try to renegotiate another package and arrangement,'' he said. ''That's not to say that parties don't have the right to change their leadership but they can't expect the status quo to remain in terms of the crossbench.''

Mr Oakeshott said he believed the Parliament would work through any change. Mr Oakeshott, who has said all bets would be off if Labor dumped Ms Gillard, said Mr Rudd had left Ms Gillard to negotiate with the independents on Labor's behalf after the election ''and should be bound by that handshake as much as she is''. The ''handshake'' covered the deal for a stable Parliament and an election late next year.

Ms Gillard brushed off questioning about the poll but repeated that the election would be next year - a timetable that Mr Rudd also now favours if he became leader. ''We do have a lot of hard work to do and if we do that hard work, I believe we can win the election when it's held in 2013'', she said.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Tony Windsor warned that there would — and probably should — be a quick election if Labor changes leaders. He said a meltdown over leadership might be the time to ask the Australian people to decide rather than renegotiate arrangements with the independents.

Both Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott are strongly backing Julia Gillard. They revealed they had been sounded out last year about a possible change of Labor leader, but both have expressed support for Gillard while noting different views on how Parliament would handle any leadership change.

The minority Labor government depends on the backing of crossbenchers like Windsor and Oakeshott. If Labor changed leaders, those independents signalled their support could shift or that they might insist on a public vote — so their stance is crucial for the government’s stability.

The Age/Nielsen poll showed Labor’s primary vote rising to 33% and had Julia Gillard ahead of Tony Abbott as preferred prime minister for the first time in nine months. That polling boost calmed Labor’s caucus and lessened immediate pressure for a leadership change.

No — they differed. Tony Windsor predicted a change to Kevin Rudd would likely produce a quick election, while Rob Oakeshott said he believed Parliament could work through any change. Both, however, warned that the crossbench wouldn’t necessarily accept the status quo if leadership shifted.

The ‘handshake’ refers to the post-election arrangement where Kevin Rudd left Julia Gillard to negotiate with the independents, producing a deal for a stable Parliament and an election late next year. Oakeshott argued Rudd should be bound by that agreement as much as Gillard is.

Julia Gillard brushed off leadership questions and repeated that the election would be held next year (2013). The article also notes talk that any leadership move might wait until after the March 24 Queensland election.

The article suggests investors should monitor leadership developments, polling trends like the Age/Nielsen results, the positions of key independents (Windsor and Oakeshott), and the timing of state contests such as the March 24 Queensland election — all of which affect political stability for a minority government.