US remains on borrowed time
"Safer" is the best you could say. The financial system is less shaky than when the global financial crisis broke out five years ago but it's not fixed either.
The lax lending that was the American sub-prime crisis oozed into every nook and cranny of global banking, as dud mortgages were packaged up as "you beaut" investments, with the top credit rating no less, and flogged to unsuspecting councils and even rival banks.
Once the real estate bubble popped, the big American and European banks were in strife, especially as they'd been huge buyers of European sovereign bonds as well. Financial markets froze when no bank would lend to another, one fearing it might be even more strapped for cash.
Europe's crisis came about because its banks could no longer finance the ever-increasing government debt without putting themselves in jeopardy. They've since been nationalised, recapitalised and, for all I know, homogenised but the sovereign debt is still there, lying in wait. It's only because the head of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, said he'd do anything to save the euro, by which he meant he'd print more, that the markets have backed off. For now.
Better still, they adore US Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke's money hit. Oops, I mean "quantitative easing".
American banks were also recapitalised and re-regulated after being rescued by the authorities in a good cause - to keep capitalism going. If only the problem were poor regulations or even the shoddy supervision of them.
Not that unbridled greed when things are going well or mind-numbing fear when they're going bad helps.
No, a basic economic flaw was exposed by the GFC: a feature of every financial crisis is easy money - it's just how it's made that changes. The markets were flooded with money even before QE was launched. Its source was the huge trade imbalance between the US and China, exacerbated by a misaligned exchange rate. China was accumulating gigantic trade surpluses and reserves of US dollars and these were mostly recycled into US bonds and securities, driving down rates and pushing up asset values. This was carte blanche for the financial markets to run rampant. So they did. Rates were dragged down, those who shouldn't borrow could, and Wall Street had the ride of its life.
So what's changed? There's less sub-prime lending and the US lost its AAA credit rating. And the economic imbalance is as big as ever. All that's happened is the US has joined Europe with its public debt problem and sooner or later this will cause massive market convulsions.
In fact, at the end of the month, financial markets will have to cope with the annual September shutdown showdown between President Obama and Congress.
The US government will run out of money - or rather the authority to borrow it - because a new fiscal year starts on October 1.
Although this always gets resolved in the nick of time, a few weeks later the US hits its mandated debt ceiling and won't be able to borrow full stop.
That'll be one you won't want to miss.
Twitter@moneypotts
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The article says the global financial crisis stemmed from lax lending and US sub‑prime mortgages being packaged as supposedly safe investments, which spread through global banking. When the real‑estate bubble popped, big banks and markets froze — a reminder to investors that easy money and poor underwriting can build systemic risk.
According to the article, things are 'safer' than during the crisis but not fixed — many banks were nationalised or recapitalised and markets calmed after European Central Bank assurances. However, sovereign debt still exists 'lying in wait', so the article warns the risk hasn’t fully gone away.
The article notes investors loved the Fed’s quantitative easing because it pumped money into markets, helping push rates down and asset prices up. QE amplified a longer period of easy money that encouraged borrowing and contributed to inflated asset values.
The article explains China’s large trade surpluses and accumulation of US dollars were recycled into US bonds and securities, driving down interest rates and lifting asset values. That recycling of dollars helped create the easy‑money environment that fuelled market excesses.
The article points out that many banks were recapitalised and re‑regulated after being rescued, which reduced immediate fragility. Still, deeper issues remain — especially sovereign public debt — so the system isn’t fully 'fixed' according to the author.
The article notes the US lost its AAA rating and now shares a public‑debt problem similar to Europe’s, which the author says will eventually cause 'massive market convulsions.' For investors, this highlights a heightened risk of future volatility tied to sovereign debt concerns.
The article describes an annual September budget showdown between the US president and Congress that can leave the government without authority to borrow when a new fiscal year starts. If lawmakers don’t resolve it, the US can hit its mandated debt ceiling and be unable to borrow — a situation likely to unsettle markets.
The article’s theme is caution: systemic risks from easy money, sovereign debt and political budget fights remain. Everyday investors should be aware of events like QE policy shifts, US–China imbalances, and the US fiscal and debt‑ceiling calendar, since these can drive market volatility.