US EPA finds fracking is safe
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a report finding no evidence that hydraulic fracturing or fracking causes ‘widespread’ pollution of the US’s drinking water.
Fracking – involving a mixture of chemicals, sand and water being pumped into wells at high pressure to obtain shale oil and gas – is the reason that US production of oil and natural gas has surged in recent years.
The EPA did note that, while its findings could be correct, additional data might well lead to a different conclusion.
Possibly. However, I think the correct conclusion to take from the report is that fracking, like any human activity, involves risks and has costs as well as benefits. Some of the risks were noted in the report, with the EPA identifying some instances of contamination of drinking water wells, although ‘the number of identified cases…was small compared to the number of hydraulically fractured wells’.
In any case, a rational government policy on fracking would involve finding a happy medium between the interests of frackers and the concerns of environmentalists and others in the community.
Unfortunately, this isn’t the case in New South Wales and Victoria: due to community concerns, NSW has limited coal seam gas exploration - where fracking could be used to extract any gas discovered - while Victoria has a complete moratorium on fracking.
The inevitable consequence of banning or severely limiting fracking will be lower supplies of natural gas and hence higher prices. Not only will this prove politically unpopular in coming years but will also likely mean jobs are lost in industries dependent on natural gas. The NSW and Victorian governments should take note.
To read more articles like this visit Intelligent Investor
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report found no evidence that hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, causes widespread pollution of the US's drinking water. However, it did note that additional data might lead to different conclusions.
Fracking has significantly contributed to the surge in US oil and natural gas production in recent years by allowing the extraction of shale oil and gas through high-pressure injection of chemicals, sand, and water into wells.
Yes, the EPA report acknowledges that fracking involves risks, including some instances of contamination of drinking water wells. However, the number of identified contamination cases was small compared to the total number of hydraulically fractured wells.
In New South Wales, coal seam gas exploration, where fracking could be used, is limited due to community concerns. Victoria has a complete moratorium on fracking, effectively banning the practice.
Banning or severely limiting fracking could lead to lower supplies of natural gas, resulting in higher prices. This could be politically unpopular and may lead to job losses in industries dependent on natural gas.
A rational government policy on fracking would involve finding a balance between the interests of fracking companies and the concerns of environmentalists and the community, ensuring both economic benefits and environmental protection.
Fracking might become politically unpopular due to the potential for higher natural gas prices and job losses in industries reliant on natural gas if fracking is banned or limited, as seen in regions like NSW and Victoria.
For more articles like this, you can visit Intelligent Investor, which provides insightful commentary and analysis on investment news and trends.
Call 1300 880 160
Start a chat
Schedule a call
