THE controversial FV Abel Tasman super trawler faces a two-year ban on fishing in Australian waters under planned changes to environmental law that have been hailed by recreational fishermen but will cost dozens of jobs.
Environment Minister Tony Burke said yesterday that more scientific work needed to be done to deal with concerns about the effect of the 142-metre trawler formerly known as the FV Margiris on dolphins, seals and seabirds.
Green groups and recreational fishermen welcomed the news. But the ship's local operator, Seafish Tasmania, said it would have to lay off 50 local workers.
The firm did not rule out legal action and said it had made no contingency plans for the ship, which is docked at Port Lincoln in South Australia.
Fisheries Minister Joe Ludwig said the federal government would also carry out a "root and branch review" of fisheries management law in response to concerns about the 18,000-tonne fish quota given by fisheries authorities to Seafish Tasmania for the trawler.
Mr Burke said his concerns centred on the fact that, unlike smaller fishing boats, such a large factory ship with onboard processing and freezing facilities could fish for prolonged periods in the same area.
This raised the danger of creating a "localised major bycatch issue" in which an unacceptable number of protected species such as dolphins could be caught by accident in the net in a single area of the ocean.
"When you have a vessel with a large freezer capacity, that therefore is able to remain for extended periods of time in the same part of our oceans, there are a different set of environmental considerations and that's the difference," he said.
However, the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, which had previously approved the quota, told The Age just last month that "there is no evidence to suggest that larger boats pose any greater risk to either the target species or the ecosystem".
In fact, the authority said that large boats with freezing capacity such as the Abel Tasman were less likely to cause localised depletion of fish stocks because they could range further from onshore processing facilities.
Gerry Geen, director of Seafish Tasmania, did not rule out legal action. But he added: "We haven't got that far yet."
He could not say what would happen to the ship in the immediate future.
"We didn't have any contingency plans because we thought we were going to be fishing legally in Australian waters," he said.
Mark Nikolai, of the Tasmanian Association for Recreational Fishing, said the ministers had "done exactly what the recreational fishing sector has asked to be done".
John Burgess, vice-president of the Australian National Sport Fishing Association said: "On behalf of all the recreational groups we represent, both those ministers have our eternal thanks for showing the gumption to respond to this the way they did."
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What is the current status of the FV Abel Tasman super trawler and the proposed two-year ban?
The FV Abel Tasman super trawler faces a likely two-year ban on fishing in Australian waters under planned changes to environmental law. The ship is currently docked at Port Lincoln in South Australia while ministers consider further scientific work and regulatory changes.
Why are ministers proposing a two-year ban on the Abel Tasman super trawler?
Environment Minister Tony Burke says more scientific work is needed to address concerns about the trawler’s impact on dolphins, seals and seabirds. He is particularly worried that a large factory ship with onboard processing and freezing can remain in one area for extended periods, raising the risk of a localised major bycatch issue.
How could the proposed ban affect Seafish Tasmania and local jobs?
Seafish Tasmania, the local operator of the Abel Tasman, warned the planned ban would cost dozens of jobs and said it would have to lay off about 50 local workers. The company also said it has made no contingency plans because it expected to be fishing legally in Australian waters.
Might Seafish Tasmania take legal action over the ban or quota decision?
Seafish Tasmania has not ruled out legal action. Gerry Geen, the firm’s director, said they ‘haven’t got that far yet,’ indicating legal options are being considered but no formal action had been announced in the article.
What did the Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) say about large factory trawlers like Abel Tasman?
AFMA, which previously approved the quota, told The Age there is no evidence that larger boats pose any greater risk to target species or the ecosystem. It also argued that large vessels with freezing capacity can range further from onshore processing facilities and are less likely to cause localised depletion.
What is the government’s 'root and branch review' of fisheries management law mentioned in the article?
Fisheries Minister Joe Ludwig announced a 'root and branch review' of fisheries management law in response to concerns about the 18,000-tonne fish quota granted to Seafish Tasmania for the trawler. The review aims to examine how fisheries quotas and management rules are set and could lead to changes in regulatory practices.
How have recreational fishing and environmental groups reacted to the proposed ban?
Green groups and recreational fishermen welcomed the ministers’ actions. Representatives from the Tasmanian Association for Recreational Fishing and the Australian National Sport Fishing Association publicly thanked the ministers for responding to the concerns about the super trawler.
What should investors and local stakeholders watch for next regarding the Abel Tasman situation?
Key things to watch are the results of the additional scientific work, the outcome of the government's fisheries management review, any formal legal action by Seafish Tasmania, and official decisions about the proposed two-year ban. These developments will clarify regulatory risk, potential operational impacts on Seafish Tasmania, and any broader changes to quota policy.