Treasury puts Penfolds in prime position

Treasury Wine's announcement of a change to the marketing of its flagship brand Penfolds is a clever strategy that will shift the market's focus to the latent value in its luxury and masstige portfolio.

It may appear incongruous that the sharemarket’s initial response to Treasury Wine Estate’s latest bout of impairment charges was to mark up the group’s share price. That may be related to reports of a lengthening queue of potential bidders, but it’s also possible that the market was relieved by what wasn’t in the announcement.

Even though Treasury has previously lowered its guidance for its earnings before interest, tax and SGARA (the industry’s treatment of inventories) this financial year by $40 million, its ability to meet the revised range of $190m to $210m has been severely questioned and new chief executive Michael Clarke has studiously avoided committing to it.

As the end of the financial year nears, it would have made sense for Treasury to disclose any downgrade of its earnings with the announcement of the $260m of non-cash impairment charges. It didn’t, so the obvious assumption is that it is on track to deliver something close to or within the foreshadowed range.

If that is the case, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, the giant private equity firm that approached Treasury in April with a proposal for a $4.70 a share scheme of arrangement offer, would be disappointed. Another downgrade of earnings for this financial year would make Treasury more vulnerable.

KKR might also be concerned about reports that a host of other parties are running the numbers on a bid for Treasury. However, in the near term, the traction Clarke appears to have gained both within the business and the market is probably the biggest obstacle to a successful offer.

Clarke, in the role for less than three months, has hit the ground running. Last month he announced plans to take $35m out of the group’s cost base in the 2014-15 financial year; today he announced a fundamental change in the way Treasury sells its flagship Penfolds brand.

Traditionally Treasury has released its Penfolds wines in the final quarter of the financial year, creating considerable pressure for the group to offload its inventories by offering discounts or extended credit terms in order to book the revenue before the end of the financial year.

As Clarke indicated today, that’s not the way to treat an iconic brand with respect. It’s also not the way to maximise the value of the releases.

Treasury is now going to move the release date for Penfolds to October, starting this year. As he said, that will give the group a longer selling period, reduce the pressure to sell the wine ahead of an artificial deadline and make more of the wine available for key festive periods like Thanksgiving in the US, Christmas, New Year and Chinese New Year.

It might also improve Treasury’s negotiating position with distributors and retailers, and will give Treasury’s first-half earnings an extra kick next year during its period of maximum vulnerability. It could buy time for Clarke to be able to demonstrate his ability to structurally improve Treasury’s performance.

Treasury has built up a big reserve of premium non-current inventory and latent profitability that it could draw on to manage the impact of two release periods this calendar year.

To support its key brands Treasury is planning to lift its marketing spend by 50 per cent, including year-round support for Penfolds.

The impairment charges announced today relate, it said, to acquisitions made before the de-merger of Treasury from Foster’s Group and are mainly related to commercial wine brands, with a majority of the impairment charges against its US brands.

They come against the backdrop of a restructuring of Treasury’s portfolio to separate its luxury and 'masstige' portfolio from its commercial wines, which will each now be managed separately. Treasury is also separating its Asia, Europe, Middle East and African operations from its Australasian business.

The rationale for the split of commercial and premium wines is that their markets are different and require quite different focuses.

Their separation would also make it easier if, at some point in future, Clarke wanted to take the 'premiumisation' strategy he has recommitted Treasury to its logical conclusion and hive off the commercial portfolio, which has a lower growth profile and lower margins than the premium brands.

With last year’s $160m of impairments, Treasury has now carved a massive chunk out of the book value of its commercial wine portfolio, most of it in the US. The market for low-end wines is ultra-competitive and crowded and demand is volatile, whereas there is growth at the premium end and an improving supply-demand equation.

The changes Clarke announced today, including the latest impairments, will help its management and the market to focus on the value and prospects of its luxury and masstige portfolio and on the jewel within it: the Penfolds brand.

That’s an intelligent evolution in its strategy, both for the business itself and for a company targeted by actual and potential suitors, largely because of the latent value in the Penfolds brand.

Related Articles