InvestSMART

Transfer crackdown

The strategy To prepare for the new rules on off-market transfers and self-managed super funds.
By · 25 Apr 2012
By ·
25 Apr 2012
comments Comments
The strategy To prepare for the new rules on off-market transfers and self-managed super funds.

Huh? OK, if you don't have a self-managed fund you can relax. These rules won't affect you. But if you do, you may need to give some thought to the looming crackdown on off-market transactions between your fund and related parties. Because you and your fund are the same people (though separate legal entities), it is not uncommon for so-called "in-specie" transfers to occur between you.

For example, you might want to transfer shares that you own personally into your super fund rather than selling them to make a super contribution and then buying the same shares within the fund. Or you might want to transfer assets from the fund to you personally when you retire in the form of a retirement benefit.

The super rules currently limit in-specie contributions to business real property or listed securities such as shares, though you can pay all sorts of assets out as in-specie benefits.

But from July 1, it is proposed that such transfers must be made through an underlying market where one exists. Where a ready market does not exist, acquisitions or disposals of assets between self-managed funds and related parties should be supported by a valuation from a qualified, independent valuer.

An added complication is that draft legislation for this change has not yet been released, says the head of superannuation at the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia, Liz Westover. So there are still questions over how it will work, particularly in regard to valuations.

Westover says if you have assets you want to transfer into, or out of, your super fund you might want to consider doing so before the new rules take effect to save on costs and administration.

She says there are some circumstances whereby the new rules will make transfers particularly difficult for funds. One is where a poorly performing share investment has resulted in an unmarketable parcel of shares. She says it would be worth buying any such shares from your super fund before the new rules come in.

If you're considering switching to a corporate trustee, you might also want to consider doing so before June 30. While the beneficial ownership of the shares won't change, Westover says brokers require you to set up a new account in the new trustee's name and to transfer the shares off market to that new account. But unless the new rules provide an exception in these circumstances (she has raised this with both the Tax Office and Treasury), that may not be possible from July 1.

I don't get it. Why change the rules in the first place? Westover says the rationale is that the ban will prevent the "cherry-picking" of dates where transfers are attributed to a date that minimises capital gains tax or excess-contributions tax. However, she says there is no evidence that abuse is occurring, and argues the change will put self-managed funds at a relative disadvantage to other super funds, which will still be permitted to make off-market transfers and could arguably abuse the rules in exactly the same way.

How will the ban work? If you own shares or other listed investments, you'll be required to sell them and buy them back on the open market, rather than simply filling out an off-market transfer form to move them from your name to the fund's (or vice versa).

Both ways, you are disposing of an asset for capital gains tax purposes and could be liable for tax on any gains. But an off-market transfer avoids brokerage costs and the time gap between waiting for settlement on the sale, transferring the cash to the other party, and buying back the shares.

With assets for which there is no underlying market (such as property), the government has said it intends to require a valuation from an independent, qualified auditor.

Westover says the current rules require assets to be transferred at market value, but you may be able to justify the value by referring to recent sales in the area or obtaining an informal valuation from a real estate agent. Lobby groups have raised the issue of the extra costs of formal valuations and the Tax Office is due to release guidance on how they should be conducted, but no one yet knows how tough it will be.

Twitter: @sampsonsmh

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The proposed ban targets transfers between self-managed super funds (SMSFs) and related parties — for example, you and your SMSF. If you don’t have an SMSF the rules won’t affect you, but everyday investors who run an SMSF should pay attention.

An in‑specie transfer moves an asset (like shares or property) directly between your name and your SMSF without selling for cash first. People use it to transfer personal shares into super as a contribution, or to move assets out of a fund as a retirement benefit.

From July 1 it’s proposed that transfers must go through an underlying market where one exists — meaning listed shares would need to be sold and repurchased on‑market rather than moved off‑market. Where there’s no ready market, acquisitions or disposals between SMSFs and related parties would need a valuation from a qualified, independent valuer.

If you own listed shares, you’ll generally have to sell them on the open market and then buy them back in the SMSF (or vice versa). That creates capital gains tax (CGT) events and may incur brokerage and timing issues that off‑market transfers previously avoided.

For assets without an underlying market the government intends to require a valuation from an independent, qualified valuer (or auditor). Currently you can rely on market value or informal valuations, but the proposed change could mean extra formal valuation costs and administration.

Some advisers in the article suggest considering transfers before the rules take effect to avoid extra valuation costs and administration. For example, buying unmarketable parcels out of your SMSF or switching to a corporate trustee before June 30 may be worth planning — but get tailored advice for your situation.

The stated rationale is to stop “cherry‑picking” transfer dates that could minimise capital gains tax or excess contributions tax. However, the article notes critics say there’s little evidence of abuse and that SMSFs may be disadvantaged compared with other funds.

Yes. Draft legislation hasn’t yet been released and the Tax Office is expected to issue guidance on valuations. That means practical details — such as how strict valuation requirements will be and any exceptions (for example when switching trustees) — are still unclear.