InvestSMART

Time Warner cuts magazines division loose

It was an elite reception at a glittery Manhattan setting: prominent media figures gathered on the 10th floor of the Time Warner Centre on Monday night to toast Sheryl Sandberg, the Facebook executive who recently released a book about her life.
By · 15 Mar 2013
By ·
15 Mar 2013
comments Comments
It was an elite reception at a glittery Manhattan setting: prominent media figures gathered on the 10th floor of the Time Warner Centre on Monday night to toast Sheryl Sandberg, the Facebook executive who recently released a book about her life.

But another executive was drawing a crowd of his own: Richard Stengel, Time magazine's managing editor. Throughout the evening, well-wishers made their way through the crowd to wish him well as Time Inc plans to separate from its parent company, Time Warner, and strike out on its own.

Only days before, Time Warner announced that it was spinning off its struggling magazine division, after failing to reach a deal to sell many of Time Inc's magazines to the Meredith Corporation.

The high-wattage party seemed like just the kind of lavish expense that Time Inc might have to leave behind as it confronts the financial challenges buffeting the publishing industry.

The magazine company is expected to start with $US500 million to $US1 billion in debt, in contrast to the publishing company that News Corp will spin off in a few months, which will have no debt.

Circulation and advertising revenue at Time Inc have suffered sharp falls. In the three months that ended December, revenue fell 7 per cent, to $US967 million, while revenue at Time Warner's cable channels has soared. After the split occurs, Time will no longer have the lucrative film and television assets to prop it up.

"It's sort of put-up-or-shut-up time," Stengel said. "I think great, let's really test that hypothesis that people will pay for great content and great journalism. We can now invest our own capital."

Time Inc executives hope they can build a company that can pour its profits into helping its magazines make the transition into the digital age, rather than hand them back to the parent company. They also hope that their new independent structure will let them restore the journalistic vision created by founder Henry Luce.

Analysts tracking the magazine industry point out that even though Time Inc's profits have fallen in recent years, the newly created company will remain by far the biggest player in the business. On its own, Time Inc generates a quarter of the revenue produced by the nation's top 50 magazines, according to data tracked by John Harrington, a magazine industry consultant.

He said that Time owned four of the nation's top 10 revenue-generating magazines: People, Sports Illustrated, Time and InStyle. Together they produce $US3.1 billion of the $US6.379 billion generated by the nation's top 10 grossing magazines, he estimated. People alone brings in $US1.4 billion.

The announcement of the spinoff last week at least provided some clarity to nervous Time Inc employees. In January, the company said it would lay off 6 per cent of its global workforce, about 500 employees. Two weeks later, Time Warner announced it was talking to Meredith, leaving those who had kept their jobs to await word of their fate, and whether they might have to move to Meredith's headquarters in Iowa.

Don Logan, chief executive of Time Inc from 1994 to 2002, noted just how challenging a task it was to transform a print magazine division for the digital age, even for a company with such strong brands.

"It's not an easy company to manage," Logan said. "It's hard to balance this."

Employees hope that as an independent company they now will be able to invest more in digital publishing, where they recognise they have plenty of catching up to do. Data provided by comScore shows that many of Time Inc's websites experienced falls in unique users in the past year.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Time Warner said it would spin off its struggling magazine division, Time Inc., after failing to reach a deal to sell many titles to the Meredith Corporation. For investors this matters because Time Inc. will become an independent company responsible for its own performance, no longer backed by Time Warner's more lucrative film and television assets.

The newly independent Time Inc. was expected to start with roughly US$500 million to US$1 billion in debt. That debt load is an important consideration for investors assessing financial risk and cash flow flexibility.

Time Inc. has seen circulation and advertising revenue fall sharply. In the three months ended December, revenue dropped 7% to US$967 million. At the same time, Time Warner’s cable channels have been growing, meaning Time Inc. will lose that internal support after the split.

Time Inc. owns four of the nation's top 10 revenue-generating magazines: People, Sports Illustrated, Time and InStyle. Together those four generate an estimated US$3.1 billion of the US$6.379 billion produced by the nation's top 10 magazines, with People alone bringing in about US$1.4 billion. Overall, Time Inc. generates about a quarter of the revenue produced by the top 50 magazines.

Key risks include the new company's debt burden, continued declines in circulation and advertising, and the challenge of transforming legacy print brands into profitable digital businesses. comScore data in the article also noted falls in unique web users for many Time Inc. sites, which adds to the risk profile.

Yes. Time Inc. managers say independence lets them 'invest our own capital' and focus profits on helping magazines transition to digital. If the company successfully monetises premium journalism and grows digital audiences, that could create long-term upside for investors. However, execution is critical.

The failed Meredith deal left staff uncertain about jobs and potential relocation, and Time Inc. had already announced plans to cut about 6% of its global workforce (roughly 500 employees). For investors, layoffs can reduce costs but also signal operational strain and the need for restructuring to stabilise margins.

Time Inc. executives expressed hope the independent structure would let them restore editorial vision and invest more in digital publishing. Richard Stengel called it 'put-up-or-shut-up time' to test whether people will pay for great content. Industry veterans like Don Logan warned that transforming a print magazine business for the digital age is difficult, even with strong brands.