InvestSMART

The election selection

You need the right profile to win over voters, says Joshua Wood.
By · 5 Oct 2013
By ·
5 Oct 2013
comments Comments
You need the right profile to win over voters, says Joshua Wood.

Spare a thought for Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott who endured one of the most gruelling selection processes a job applicant can go through. They were under intense scrutiny for every word and gesture, as they sought to be elected Prime Minister. Throughout the hiring process, they withstood reactions ranging from hysterical hatred to complete apathy. Viewed from the perspective of the average job candidate, the system seems a little insane, but the far-reaching impact of the Prime Minister's role, combined with technological advances, has created a unique hiring process.

Most of us wouldn't want to compete against other job candidates in live televised debates, or campaign to company staff for their vote. In fact, I doubt candidates for Prime Minister would ever choose such a selection process either. But the successful candidates are those who best adapt to the process and use it to their advantage.

Although politicians have honed their skills to succeed in the political arena, they would probably be a little bewildered by the recruitment process that most people go through. If Abbott and Rudd had been recruited for a role in a typical organisation, they would have submitted a CV and cover letter in response to an advertisement. The ad would ask for "previous experience in politics" (tick), the perennial "excellent verbal communication" (tick) and "trustworthiness" (it's hard to meet all job requirements). After all that, their application might only be skimmed for less than 60 seconds.

And sure, some of the interview questions that political candidates are asked seem irrelevant to the role, (e.g. "What is the price of a litre of milk?") but imagine if they had to answer some of the questions most people get. Questions such as, "If you could be any animal in the jungle, which one would you choose to be?", or "What would I find in your fridge right now?"

Finally, they would need to provide details of previous managers for reference checks. In Abbott's case, his previous "managers" include Malcolm Turnbull. In Rudd's case, his previous managers include Julia Gillard and Mark Latham!

Selection processes in an industry often evolve into systems that select the best workers for the jobs of that particular industry - people who will flourish in response to the demands of the roles. Practices that are effective, and in fact the norm, for one sector can seem absurd or unreasonable in another. Hiring methods also tend to include some elements that are ineffective, but have found their way into the process anyway. Regardless, the successful candidates are those who best adapt to the process as it exists and use it to their advantage.

When trying for jobs, you can benefit from understanding your industry and adapting to its assessment methods of choice. For example, going for a kitchenhand job in a restaurant often involves an on-the-job trial - so you need to learn how to excel in that selection situation. That requires more than just chopping a few vegies - it's also about quickly fitting into a team in a high-pressure environment, following directions accurately and working very fast to complete tasks.

Air-traffic controllers, on the other hand, don't start with an on-the-job trial. They usually have to go through structured interviews, group exercises, spatial awareness tests and reflex tests.

Group exercises are parallel universes that become easier to navigate with experience, especially once you begin to understand what you are being assessed for. For interviews, some questions come up repeatedly within particular industries. Over time, the questions become familiar and with practise it's possible to develop engaging and informative vignettes about your work experiences which improve your odds of getting the job. It won't necessarily land you a job that you are not up to, but if you are equipped for the role it will give you a fighting chance.

Navigating through the recruitment process of your particular sector is a learnable skill and something you can improve with practise, regardless of your other job skills and experience. Hopefully, you develop your job related skills too. But practising those hiring process skills is particularly valuable, if your goal is to work within a particular sector over the long term.

And if your chosen career is in politics, make sure you know the price of a litre of milk.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The article explains that political selection is uniquely intense: candidates face live televised debates, public scrutiny and campaigning rather than just submitting a CV. While a normal recruitment process often starts with a job ad, CV and a brief skim of applications, political hopefuls must perform under constant media and public examination and adapt to that environment to succeed.

Selection systems tend to evolve to pick the people who will flourish given an industry’s specific demands. Practices that work in one sector can seem absurd in another, so the candidates who best understand and adapt to an industry’s assessment methods — whether trials, tests or interviews — have the advantage.

The article contrasts common methods: a kitchenhand often faces an on‑the‑job trial where speed, teamwork and following directions matter, while air‑traffic controllers usually go through structured interviews, group exercises, spatial awareness tests and reflex tests. Each method tests skills relevant to the job.

Questions that appear odd — from politicians being asked the price of a litre of milk to quirky fridge or animal questions — often evaluate adaptability, quick thinking, communication and cultural fit rather than literal knowledge. The article points out these questions are part of many selection environments.

The article says recruitment navigation is a learnable skill: practise group exercises, familiarise yourself with common interview questions in your sector, and prepare engaging vignettes about your experience. This rehearsal makes you more confident and improves your odds when the process matches your actual skills.

Reference checks are a standard part of many recruitment processes to confirm past performance and managers. The article gives political examples: Tony Abbott’s past ‘managers’ include Malcolm Turnbull, while Kevin Rudd’s include Julia Gillard and Mark Latham, illustrating how references are used to assess candidates.

According to the article, experience and practice help. Learn what assessors are looking for, practise collaborative tasks, and develop clear, concise stories about your work experience. Understanding the assessment criteria makes group exercises easier to navigate over time.

The key advice is to understand your industry’s recruitment methods and practise the specific hiring skills they test, in addition to developing job-related abilities. If you plan to work long‑term in a sector, being adept at its selection process is especially valuable — and if you’re aiming for politics, the article cheekily adds, know the price of a litre of milk.