One of the Federal Parliament's most senior executives has announced his early retirement.
ONE of the Federal Parliament's most senior executives has announced his early retirement as a Senate committee probes allegations of maladministration and bullying in his department.
Department of Parliamentary Services secretary Alan Thompson sent staff a memo last week announcing his intention to retire with the expectation of finishing as agency head in early April.
Mr Thompson said it had been ''an honour and a privilege'' to serve the Parliament over the past 3? years.
Mr Thompson's early departure comes as the Senate finance and public administration committee pursues a wide-ranging investigation into the performance of his agency, which employs 800 staff and spends $120 million a year providing services within Parliament House.
Parliamentary Services came under the political spotlight last year when questioning by Labor senator John Faulkner at an estimates hearing revealed two historic billiard tables inherited from Old Parliament House had been sold for a knock-down price of $5000 without any heritage assessment.
Mr Thompson was forced to make an unprecedented apology for providing ''misleading and inaccurate information'' to the Senate, adding his department's conduct was ''absolutely not acceptable'' and ''inconsistent with our commitment to serve the Parliament honestly, diligently and competently''.
More than $100,000 was spent on external and internal reviews arising from the sale of the billiard tables that yielded only $2000 after auctioneer's and removalist's fees of more than $3000 were taken into account.
The ''billiard tables affair'' triggered a wider Senate committee inquiry into the general administration of Parliament House.
The committee heard award-winning Parliament House architect Romaldo Giurgola's ''extreme distress'' that bureaucrats failed to consult him on major changes to the internal design of the building.
Giurgola and colleagues from his firm revealed Parliamentary Services had over eight years failed to finalise a key architectural design and planning document intended to guide the long-term preservation of Parliament House, while numerous custom-made furnishings and fittings were sold off or discarded in skips.
New Parliamentary Services guidelines for disposal of property still provide for the option of ''destruction'' for furnishings and other items identified as having enduring ''cultural or heritage significance''.
However, it is expected the Senate inquiry will now proceed to other issues including serious irregularities in contracting and what former and serving departmental officers have described as a ''toxic'' and ''paranoid'' work environment characterised by bullying and harassment.
In its submission the Community and Public Sector Union reported one-third of Parliamentary Service personnel had experienced bullying, but very few reported it for fear of retribution and lack of support from senior managers. The security team and the Parliamentary Library have been pointed to by insiders as areas where bullying and harassment are especially prevalent.
Senator Faulkner has said the inquiry's terms of reference are ''broad, deliberately so'' and ''the committee has only just started ? and is very determined to pursue the task it has in front of it''.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
Who announced the early retirement related to the Senate probe into Parliamentary Services?
Department of Parliamentary Services secretary Alan Thompson announced his early retirement, saying he expected to finish as agency head in early April. His departure follows a Senate committee probe into allegations of maladministration and bullying in his department.
What was the 'billiard tables affair' and why did it attract political attention?
The 'billiard tables affair' refers to the sale of two historic billiard tables inherited from Old Parliament House that were sold for a knock-down price of $5,000 without any heritage assessment. The sale prompted over $100,000 in external and internal reviews yet yielded only $2,000 after auctioneer and removalist fees, and led to an unprecedented apology for providing misleading and inaccurate information to the Senate.
How large is the Department of Parliamentary Services and what is its annual budget?
The article states Parliamentary Services employs about 800 staff and spends roughly $120 million a year providing services within Parliament House.
What issues is the Senate finance and public administration committee investigating?
The committee’s wide-ranging inquiry covers the performance and general administration of Parliamentary Services, including the sale and disposal of items, suspected contracting irregularities, failures in planning and heritage management, and allegations of a toxic workplace culture characterised by bullying and harassment.
What evidence did architects and heritage experts give to the inquiry?
Award-winning Parliament House architect Romaldo Giurgola and colleagues told the committee they were in 'extreme distress' that bureaucrats failed to consult them on major internal design changes. They also revealed Parliamentary Services failed for over eight years to finalise a key architectural design and planning document intended to guide long-term preservation.
What did staff and unions report about workplace culture at Parliamentary Services?
The Community and Public Sector Union reported that about one-third of Parliamentary Service personnel had experienced bullying, but few reported it because of fear of retribution and lack of senior-manager support. Insiders pointed to the security team and the Parliamentary Library as areas where bullying and harassment were especially prevalent.
Have disposal guidelines changed after the controversy over heritage items?
Parliamentary Services introduced new disposal guidelines, but they still provide for the option of 'destruction' for furnishings and other items identified as having enduring 'cultural or heritage significance', according to the article.
How should everyday investors follow this story and why might it matter to them?
Everyday investors may want to monitor the Senate inquiry’s findings because it is investigating contracting irregularities and administration at an agency that spends about $120 million a year. The committee’s outcomes could affect public-sector procurement practices, contract transparency and reputational risk for companies that supply services to Parliament House or similar government agencies.