InvestSMART

Rolling over to escape the tax man

Pensions offer the most straightforward form of income in retirement - and keep the ATO at bay, writes George Cochrane.
By · 27 Nov 2011
By ·
27 Nov 2011
comments Comments
Pensions offer the most straightforward form of income in retirement and keep the ATO at bay, writes George Cochrane.

I AM a member of a defined scheme (Defence Forces Retirement and Death Benefits Fund) and am wondering about the advantages of taking a full pension (indexed CPI) of $90,000 when I retire, or commuting to a $65,000 pension and $443,000 lump sum (of which $215,000 is tax free), the rest being taxable and/or untaxed? I own my own home and will have other super lump sums of about $257,000 available. I am 56 years old and intend to retire at 58. I am concerned about the tax on all of this and intend to rollover the lump sums until 60 then take them as an income stream to minimise tax. A.T.

Assuming your health is good and there are no exceptional family circumstances, I would consider taking the full pension given that you, hopefully, have a long life expectancy. It provides the most hassle-free form of retirement income.

For tax reasons, you may be better off waiting until age 60 before retirement as the government-sourced portion (that is, the untaxed portion of your pension) would be fully taxed until then. After age 60, you will receive a 10 per cent tax offset.

Lump sums also have reduced tax liabilities after that age. Under 60, what is bizarrely known as the "taxable component-element untaxed" (in this case, sourced from the government's consolidated revenue) is taxed at 16? per cent on the first $165,000 and 31? per cent thereafter. From 60 on, this is taxed at 16? per cent up to the "untaxed plan cap" of $1.205 million.

That portion of the lump sum earned as interest on the post-tax contributions from your pay during your career and known, equally bizarrely, as the "taxable component-element taxed" is tax free up to $165,000, then 16? per cent on the rest under 60 but is completely tax free from that birthday on.

You don't give enough detail here but should be able to get a breakdown of your personal tax liability from ComSuper.

Don't rely on figures in the DFRDB website's fact sheets they are hopelessly out of date.

Get expertise in the house

I WOULD like to protect our family home from being taken if my partner's business were to collapse. We purchased our family home jointly. He is a company director in a high-risk industry (aviation). While he is insured, the insurance company cannot provide coverage over prospective loss (for instance, if a plane is grounded). In a worst-case scenario if this were to happen, he could be sued for millions and our family home could be at risk. I was told not to bother transferring the mortgage to my name alone, as his name would still be on the title. To transfer the title to my name would cost half the stamp duty, about $25,000. This is too much to spend. Can we develop a separate company in order to protect our assets? T.L.

An investment adviser is probably not the person from whom you will get the technical answers you need. I suggest you talk to two experts: a solicitor experienced in the fields of company and insurance law and director's responsibilities and an insurance agent trained in directors' and officers liability insurance.

Your husband won't be the only person in such a situation in the aviation industry, so there will be answers available. You might find, however, that a one-off payment of stamp duty could end up cheaper than the alternatives.

Part pension possible

I HAVE been in the government's pension-bonus scheme for three years and in another two years will be eligible for a payment of just over $40,000. I am 70, work four days a week and intend to retire after I receive the above payment. I will own my home and will have, hopefully, about $500,000 in superannuation. Would I be eligible for any aged pension under this scenario? A.S.

You should be eligible for a part pension. If a single home owner, the age pension currently only cuts out after your assets reach $686,000 (or $1.018 million if married). A single with $540,000 in assets would be awarded about $210 a fortnight and a married couple about $700, both under the assets test. All of these figures will change two years from now, as may the deeming rates for the income test.

If you have a question for George Cochrane, send it to Personal Investment, PO Box 3001, Tamarama, NSW 2026. Helplines: Banking Ombudsman, 1300 780 808 pensions, 13 23 00.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

A full defined-scheme pension is the most straightforward form of retirement income and keeps the ATO at bay — it can be hassle-free if you expect a long life. Commuting to a lump sum can give you liquidity (for example, swapping a $90,000 indexed pension for a $65,000 pension plus a $443,000 lump sum in the article’s example), but it creates taxable and tax-free components and may increase your tax bill depending on your age when you take it.

If you access the untaxed (government-sourced) portion before age 60, the taxable component labeled “element untaxed” is taxed at 16% on the first $165,000 and 31% on amounts above that. Other components (the “taxed” element) have different treatment — some tax-free up to $165,000 then 16% on the remainder under 60.

If you wait until age 60 the tax position improves: you receive a 10% tax offset on the government-sourced (untaxed) portion, the untaxed element is taxed at 16% up to the untaxed plan cap ($1.205 million in the article), and the taxed component becomes completely tax free from your 60th birthday.

You should request a personalised tax breakdown from ComSuper (the administrator) — they can give specific figures for your situation. The article warns not to rely on the DFRDB website fact sheets because they are hopelessly out of date.

Consider your health, life expectancy and whether you prefer hassle-free guaranteed income. For tax reasons, waiting until age 60 can reduce the tax on government-sourced and lump-sum components, but personal circumstances vary — get a tailored breakdown from ComSuper and consider professional advice before deciding.

Asset protection is technical. The article recommends talking to two experts: a solicitor experienced in company and insurance law (and directors’ responsibilities) and an insurance agent who specialises in directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. A one‑off stamp duty payment to restructure title might, in some cases, be cheaper than alternatives — but get expert legal and insurance advice first.

Yes — you would likely be eligible for a part age pension. At the time of the article the age pension only cut out for a single home owner after assets reached $686,000 (or $1.018 million if married). For example, a single with $540,000 in assets might receive about $210 a fortnight under the assets test, and a married couple about $700. Note these figures and deeming rates may change in future.

No — the article explicitly warns that the DFRDB website fact sheets are hopelessly out of date. For accurate and current tax figures you should get a personalised breakdown from ComSuper and consider advice from qualified advisers.