Revised treaty squeezes open Swiss banks' doors
The revised tax treaty, signed by Assistant Treasurer David Bradbury on Tuesday, will allow for data held by Swiss banks and financial institutions to be shared with Australian tax authorities with few questions asked. It is the first time the government has changed the treaty since it was established more than three decades ago.
The revised treaty comes at a time when tax authorities in the US, Britain and Australia are grappling with a huge cache of secret offshore data leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists earlier in the year. The data revealed the activities of dozens of accountants, lawyers and financial advisers who have helped in the establishment of companies in tax havens.
Tax experts say the revised treaty could have gone further to include automatic information exchange - the new standard set by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - but that it is still a big step in countering Switzerland's bank secrecy rules. Those exposed will be rich Australians as well as criminals.
"It will unlock tax evasion - or secret bank accounts - that haven't been disclosed to the ATO," said Michael Kobetsky, associate professor at the University of Melbourne. "This may be people who set up an account, say, 20 years ago, thinking they will never have to disclose it. Now they're exposed."
Mr Bradbury said the treaty was important given the push for more tax transparency globally.
"In the last decade, more has occurred in tax transparency than in any other period," he said.
The revised tax treaty also deals with multinational tax avoidance though anti-abuse clauses. These attempt to counter base erosion and profit shifting by denying companies the ability to set up shell companies with the sole purpose of taking advantage of the treaty.
Many large companies based in Switzerland invest in Australia, such as Anglo-Swiss mining giant Glencore Xstrata. According to Treasury, Switzerland was Australia's fifth largest source of foreign direct investment, with $23 billion spent in 2011. Australian foreign direct investment in Switzerland amounted to $6.2 billion for the period.
The Swiss government said on Tuesday that despite being known for its bank secrecy laws, it was committed to greater transparency. "The paradigm has changed," Swiss ambassador Marcel Stutz said. "If you want to have good investment, you want to be sure people play by the rules."
But David Rosenbloom, director of the international tax program at New York University School of Law, said Switzerland was still resistant to change.
"They made financial institutions a big part of the economy and a big part of the way they viewed themselves," he said. "The world is moving to greater transparency generally, and Switzerland is being dragged along, kicking and screaming."
Mr Bradbury would not say how much revenue he hoped to bring in from the new treaty. "We haven't done this on the basis that we expect to raise an extra X million dollars," he said. "We do think it will be an important contribution."
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The revised treaty lets Australian tax authorities request and receive secret Swiss bank account details on Australians, a major step against money laundering and international tax fraud. It's the first change to the treaty in more than three decades and could expose previously undisclosed accounts.
No. The treaty allows information to be shared on request, but it does not adopt the OECD’s newer automatic information exchange standard. Tax experts say the treaty could have gone further to include automatic exchange.
The revised treaty includes anti‑abuse clauses designed to counter base erosion and profit shifting by preventing shell companies that exploit the treaty. That matters because many large Swiss companies, such as Glencore Xstrata, invest in Australia.
Most direct impacts are likely to fall on wealthy individuals and those hiding funds, but any Australian investor who has undisclosed Swiss accounts could be exposed to ATO scrutiny. The change is part of a broader global push for greater tax transparency.
Assistant Treasurer David Bradbury would not specify an expected revenue figure. He said the treaty wasn't done on the basis of raising a set amount, but that it should make an important contribution to tax collections.
The revised treaty comes at a time when tax authorities in the US, Britain and Australia have been dealing with a large cache of offshore data leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, which revealed how advisers helped set up tax haven structures. Those leaks added momentum to calls for greater information sharing.
Switzerland says it is committed to greater transparency—Swiss ambassador Marcel Stutz said 'the paradigm has changed'—but some experts, like David Rosenbloom, warn Switzerland remains resistant and is being pushed toward change rather than leading it.
Switzerland is a significant investor in Australia: Treasury data cited in the article shows Switzerland was Australia’s fifth largest source of foreign direct investment with $23 billion invested in 2011. Australian investment in Switzerland amounted to $6.2 billion for the period referenced.