InvestSMART

Options to promote healthy wealth growth

TES CRUZ can afford to put more into super, but doesn't want to.
By · 28 Oct 2012
By ·
28 Oct 2012
comments Comments
TES CRUZ can afford to put more into super, but doesn't want to.

"I don't want to tie my hands down I want to be able to pull funds out if I need," she says. "You want to enjoy life a little bit."

After her husband died earlier this year, she sold an investment property and put all the money in term deposits.

Three months is the longest, a far cry from what would be a 20-year commitment to superannuation.

The sharemarket doesn't appeal, although she has another investment property that is positively geared.

Tes would probably be happy rolling over her term deposits for at least the next 17 years, until she retires.

"If anything, they have more security and a better interest rate, so why not?" she says.

To the embarrassment of the funds management industry, that would have worked a treat over the past 10 years.

The trouble is, says Mike Ingham, the principal consultant at Obelisk Advisors, "97 per cent of the income she receives from her term deposits will be eaten up by inflation and tax", based on a 37 per cent marginal rate that cuts in at $80,000, and 3 per cent inflation.

So Tes needs something that will grow.

"Despite the impact of the GFC, the Australian sharemarket has still managed to return 8.9 per cent over the past 20 years and 7.1 per cent over 10 years," Ingham says.

"Australia's dividend imputation system, and the 30 per cent franking credit received with dividend income paid by many companies, makes shares a very tax-effective investment option."

And there's more than one way to skin a super cat. Insurance bonds are an alternative because they are more flexible, Suzanne Haddan, the managing director of BFG Financial Services, says.

"Tax is paid by the life office on behalf of the investor at a maximum rate of 30 per cent and the monies can be withdrawn after 10 years with no further tax payable," she says. "If Tes required the funds, she could withdraw within the 10 years, but the interest-earned portion of the withdrawal may be taxable at marginal income tax rates with a 30 per cent tax offset."

Another way around the problem is through insurance cover.

"Having to sell assets at an inopportune time is never a good thing and insurances would have mitigated this risk," Paul Moran, of Paul Moran Financial Planning, says.

"At Tes's age, the loss of flexibility in super is quite correctly an issue. However, trickling in funds via compulsory employer contributions and a little salary sacrifice can make a large difference in retirement comfort,"

"Life insurance is effectively tax-deductible if it is held inside super, but income protection is often better held privately, as it is personally tax deductible and can be more flexible if held outside of super."

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Superannuation can boost retirement savings tax-effectively, but it limits access to your money until retirement. As the article’s example shows, some people prefer term deposits or other flexible options because they want to be able to pull funds out if needed, so weigh the tax benefits of super against your need for liquidity and flexibility.

Term deposits offer security and predictable interest, which can appeal to risk-averse investors, but the article warns most of the interest can be eroded by tax and inflation over time. If growth to beat inflation is important, term deposits alone may not deliver the long-term returns needed for retirement.

According to the article, Mike Ingham estimates about 97% of the income from term deposits could be eaten by inflation and tax using a 37% marginal rate (which cuts in at $80,000) and 3% inflation. That means nominal interest won’t necessarily translate into increased purchasing power after tax and inflation are accounted for.

The article notes the Australian sharemarket returned about 8.9% over 20 years and 7.1% over 10 years, and that Australia’s dividend imputation system (including 30% franking credits on many dividends) can make shares a tax-effective way to pursue growth. For investors seeking long-term real returns, shares can be a stronger option than cash, though they come with market risk.

Insurance bonds (investment bonds) are more flexible than super for accessing money and are taxed by the life office at a maximum rate of 30%. Per the article, funds can be withdrawn after 10 years with no further tax payable; early withdrawals may have the interest portion taxed at marginal rates with a 30% tax offset.

Yes. The article quotes Paul Moran saying insurance can mitigate the risk of having to sell assets at an inopportune time after a life event, helping preserve investments and providing financial cover when cash is needed unexpectedly.

The article suggests that trickling funds into super via compulsory employer contributions plus a little salary sacrifice can make a large difference to retirement comfort over time, combining regular contributions with the tax advantages of superannuation to grow savings.

According to the article, life insurance held inside super is effectively tax-deductible, while income protection is often better held privately because premiums are personally tax-deductible and private policies can offer greater flexibility outside super.