Market yields to upturn
With David Potts
With David Potts
At first glance, the biannual corporate show-and-tell seemed to be all show and little tell.
Never have so many chief executives, from BHP Billiton to Network Ten, been rolled just before or during a profit-reporting season.
All those asset write-downs are hardly a vote of confidence, either.
Yet more telling is the surprising rise in revenues among non-mining stocks, extending even to lower-than-feared drops for the loss makers.
Another thing. About half the stocks in the ASX 200 lifted their dividends, the best sign of all that a board is confident that things are on the mend.
No board wants to lift the dividend if there's a risk of having to drop it again the next time. In many cases the dividend was lifted by more than the rise in earnings, too, not that we're talking large percentages either way here.
But bear in mind that most companies were reporting on the second half of last year, which economists say was a particularly bad patch. Then there's all that cost-cutting and staff-shedding.
With a lower cost base, at least when the economy picks up, the rise in profits will be amplified.
The official economic forecast expects it to be a bit worse than last year, but picking up towards Christmas.
Considering last year hasn't turned out to be so bad after all for profits, maybe the market isn't running ahead of itself as many fear.
Then again, a double-digit jump in three months is a stretch.
So what changed for the better?
Well, nothing really. It's just that last year's rate cuts are finally coming home to roost. Better late than never.
Low rates have not only cut the cost of borrowing, both for corporations and households, but also made it less attractive to save.
Indeed, there are some faint signs of a pick-up in home building as well as spending by households.
Fortunately if these falter - the prolonged election campaign sure won't help - the Reserve Bank has promised to cut rates to give them a nudge on.
It has to be said much could still go wrong internationally, but so long as central banks are pumping liquidity into the system, sharemarkets have nothing to worry about.
The funny thing is that although our market is being driven by a rush into high-dividend-yielding stocks, such as the banks and Telstra, these have also posted some of the biggest price gains.
How about that? You buy for the yield, and you get the bonus of a healthy capital gain.
In fact, the gains in their share prices have been way above what they've paid in dividends over the past year.
If you ask me, it sounds too good to last. As the crowd climbs on the yield bandwagon, there's a risk the banks become overvalued. The higher their shares go, the less safe they become because of the increased damage a fall could wreak on those who jumped in last.
Besides, the banks can only grow marginally while credit growth is so low.
But other blue chips aren't as constrained. Take BHP Billiton.
It yields a modest 4 per cent with franking credits but is sitting on a huge mound of capital, some of which eventually will finish up in shareholders' pockets one way or another.
And did I mention the export boom?
Remember: in the global financial crisis it was the banks, not BHP, that cut dividends and put their hands out for more capital.
Twitter @moneypotts
At first glance, the biannual corporate show-and-tell seemed to be all show and little tell.
Never have so many chief executives, from BHP Billiton to Network Ten, been rolled just before or during a profit-reporting season.
All those asset write-downs are hardly a vote of confidence, either.
Yet more telling is the surprising rise in revenues among non-mining stocks, extending even to lower-than-feared drops for the loss makers.
Another thing. About half the stocks in the ASX 200 lifted their dividends, the best sign of all that a board is confident that things are on the mend.
No board wants to lift the dividend if there's a risk of having to drop it again the next time. In many cases the dividend was lifted by more than the rise in earnings, too, not that we're talking large percentages either way here.
But bear in mind that most companies were reporting on the second half of last year, which economists say was a particularly bad patch. Then there's all that cost-cutting and staff-shedding.
With a lower cost base, at least when the economy picks up, the rise in profits will be amplified.
The official economic forecast expects it to be a bit worse than last year, but picking up towards Christmas.
Considering last year hasn't turned out to be so bad after all for profits, maybe the market isn't running ahead of itself as many fear.
Then again, a double-digit jump in three months is a stretch.
So what changed for the better?
Well, nothing really. It's just that last year's rate cuts are finally coming home to roost. Better late than never.
Low rates have not only cut the cost of borrowing, both for corporations and households, but also made it less attractive to save.
Indeed, there are some faint signs of a pick-up in home building as well as spending by households.
Fortunately if these falter - the prolonged election campaign sure won't help - the Reserve Bank has promised to cut rates to give them a nudge on.
It has to be said much could still go wrong internationally, but so long as central banks are pumping liquidity into the system, sharemarkets have nothing to worry about.
The funny thing is that although our market is being driven by a rush into high-dividend-yielding stocks, such as the banks and Telstra, these have also posted some of the biggest price gains.
How about that? You buy for the yield, and you get the bonus of a healthy capital gain.
In fact, the gains in their share prices have been way above what they've paid in dividends over the past year.
If you ask me, it sounds too good to last. As the crowd climbs on the yield bandwagon, there's a risk the banks become overvalued. The higher their shares go, the less safe they become because of the increased damage a fall could wreak on those who jumped in last.
Besides, the banks can only grow marginally while credit growth is so low.
But other blue chips aren't as constrained. Take BHP Billiton.
It yields a modest 4 per cent with franking credits but is sitting on a huge mound of capital, some of which eventually will finish up in shareholders' pockets one way or another.
And did I mention the export boom?
Remember: in the global financial crisis it was the banks, not BHP, that cut dividends and put their hands out for more capital.
Twitter @moneypotts
Share this article and show your support