Ludowici eyes the finish line

The Takeovers Panel is no longer a concern for Ludowici shareholders – but keep an eye on Weir.

PORTFOLIO POINT: With the Takeovers Panel no longer a concern, Ludowici shareholders need only worry about whether Weir will come back with a higher bid.

Ludowici (LDW). Forget the Takeovers Panel now, because although they can’t seem to get their hands out of this deal, it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that we see another one or two bids for Ludowici.

To recap, Danish group FLSmidth lobbed a $7.20 bid at a very surprised and very happy Ludowici board (it was trading at the time around $3.50). The foreign company’s CEO then made some off-the-cuff comments about not lifting the bid just to entice shareholders into the deal and Scottish group Weir followed those quotes with a $7.92 counter offer. Then the Takeovers Panel got involved over the comments, yet the bidding war continued. Today, Weir Group is standing on $10 and FLSmidth on $11.

The Takeovers Panel has now said all bidding activity must stop until it approves all the offers that have already gone ahead (something Ludowici described in the press today as “bureaucracy gone mad”). I don’t understand what the Panel is doing here, because it’s already effectively approved all the bids to date.

So forget the Panel now; the only thing you need to worry about is whether Weir comes back with a higher bid. I think it is entirely possible that it does, even though on a valuation basis Ludowici is looking very expensive, and you should find out whether it will make another move within a week at most. This is because, unlike the ACCC, the Takeovers Panel is often filled with lawyers and merchant bankers who understand the urgency under which these decisions must be made.

So would I buy in at $11.06? Probably not, but Weir has already bid twice and FLSmidth three times, so there might be a couple more in this one.

Echo Entertainment Group (EGP). Much has been said about the share raid by Crown (see: James Packer) on rival casino operator Echo, but what they’ve done instead is essentially buy a very large contract for difference (CFD).

They entered into a swap deal where Deutsche Bank bought shares in Echo, but it’s Crown that bears any benefit or the loss if the stock moves above or below the strike price of $3.73. So Packer doesn’t own 10% of Echo yet, just the 4.9% the company bought last year.

This isn’t an unusual structure, but people are asking questions over whether an economic interest (where Crown makes a profit or loss on the stock even though they don’t actually own them) is the same as effective control, where they could direct the voting rights attached to the stock. It’s up to the regulators to decide whether an economic interest should count for the purposes of a substantial shareholding – which could get complicated.

Does it really matter? No. We know Packer wants Echo.

The nuances of exactly why are also starting to come out. Last week, I said there will only ever be one casino in each Australian city, and now we know that Packer would like to split Star City Casino in Sydney into two: one for everyone else and one in a separate building for the high rollers on the Barangaroo development, preferably with Echo paying for the lot.

It’s technically just extending the one licence over two locations, and for this reason Packer can’t do it without owning or controlling existing licence-holder Echo.

What’s also up for debate is whether Crown lifts its stake to 20% and then lobs a full takeover bid, or Packer tries to influence Echo as a board member.

The important thing is to remember that you can never trust what people say in these contexts. Packer won’t come out and say there’s a bid in the offing (because then Crown will have to make one and he will have showed his hand), and allegations that he may just creep up the register a la Kerry Stokes could be a foil to bring down the share price before making an offer.

All we know is that he’s seriously interested.

Goodman Fielder (GFF). Like Billabong and Pacific Brands, this is a beaten-up stock. Goodman Fielder has taken punches not just from the supermarket price wars but from rising raw materials prices as well, but within the company is a kernel of value that is obviously appealing to Wilmar International.

The successful buyer of CSR’s Sucrogen business, Wilmar last week built a 10.1% stake in Goodman but was aiming for 15%. As it’s clearly trying to consolidate food assets in this part of the world, this is a good sign for shareholders in the Australian company and Wilmar has been smart by getting set before any bidding has started – much like James Packer with Echo.

Wilmar says it hasn’t decided whether it will make a bid yet, but my guess is it will. The question is: at what price? Goodman is trading at half its 12-month high, and that’s with a takeover premium baked in. I think 80-85c a share is probably what you’ll get on this one.

Furthermore, while Chinese firm Bright Foods could be a contender for Goodman, Wilmar has built a bocking stake with that 10.1%. It is sizable enough to deter uncommitted bidders but also says the company is in play, and they’d best move fast if they want in.

Billabong International (BBG). In contrast to Goodman Fielder, the strategic stake in Billabong is categorically not going to lead to a takeover anytime soon.

Founder and board member Gordon Merchant has lifted his stake to 15.8% of the company and says even at $4 a share, he’s not selling. As TPG’s increased offer was $3.30, from $3, it’s unlikely shareholders would even see $4 anyway.

If you’re buying it now you’re putting your faith in Merchant to be able to turn the company around. He’s done it once before, but the world has changed since then: the dynamics of retail are different and the competition is fiercer.

Billabong could conceivably remain on private equity’s radar if the board starts doing some of the things that need to be done, such as shutting down the store chain and reverting to being a strict wholesaler again, but for the time being Billabong is not a takeover target.

New Hope Corporation (NHC).Thermal coal producer New Hope has failed to get a bid away for itself, probably because the board was asking for too much money.

New Hope put itself up for sale in October, saying that it had received a number of indicative approaches and the right thing to do was to start an auction process. Last week they ended that process, and it makes me wonder whether we’ve seen the golden days of coal.

It’s very odd for a company to just put itself up for sale. We’ve seen about $30 billion of deals in the sector over the past 12 months and if New Hope couldn’t get a nibble, I have to wonder. It also smacks of raising the white flag and admitting to some kind of internal weakness, which doesn’t instil confidence in the company or the stock.

Gloucester Coal (GCL). Gloucester is working through a merger deal with Yanzhou Coal, but although the media has taken news of an “update” to be released this week as a cue that a higher offer is forthcoming, I am sceptical.

We still don’t know how this deal will work as it involves $3.20 cash and the rest in value-guaranteed scrip in a yet-to-be-listed Australian company; it’s taken a long time and the end result is complicated.

So the fact that Gloucester told the market that an update would come this week – rather than “important news” or an “exciting announcement” – suggests that the news is not good.

The stock has fallen to $8.46 after it jumped past $10 when the deal was announced, so it’s not bad buying if everything goes well. However, if the deal falls apart, the stock will be pummelled.

Tom Elliott, a director of Beulah Capital and MM&E Capital, may have interests in any of the stocks mentioned.

-Takeover Action February 27 - March 2, 2012
Date Target
ASX
Bidder
(%)
Notes
1/03/2012 Accent Resources
ACS
Xingang Resources
60.65
28/02/2012 African Iron
AKI
Exxaro Australia
99.37
Pre-bid acceptance
15/02/2012 Brockman Resources
BRM
Wah Nam International
72.70
3/02/2012 Extract Resources
EXT
Taurus Minerals
42.74
Kalahari offer unconditional
16/12/2011 Gold One International
GDO
BCX Gold Investments
82.80
Unconditional
15/12/2011 Hastings Diversified
HDF
APA Group
20.71
29/02/2012 Living and Leisure
LLA
Merlin Entertainments
96.91
29/02/2012 Magma Metals
MMW
Panoramic Resources
12.02
24/02/2012 MSF Sugar
MSF
Mitr Phol Sugar
96.94
Unconditional
23/02/2012 Signature Metals
SBL
LionGold
32.16
Ext to Mar 16
22/02/2012 UCL Resources
UCL
Minemakers
13.10
Schemes of Arrangement
12/12/2011 Aston Resources
AZT
Whitehaven Coal
19.99
Vote late Mar
10/02/2012 Austar United Communications
AUN
Foxtel
0.00
Vote Mar 30
21/02/2012 Auzex Resources
AZZ
Bullabulling Gold
0.00
See GGG Resources -
50/50 merger. Vote Mar 22
13/02/2012 Charter Hall Office REIT
CQO
Macquarie Capital consortium
0.00
Vote Mar 15
15/02/2012 Flinders Mines
FMS
Magnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works
0.00
Vote Mar 30
21/02/2012 GGG Resources
GGB
Bullabulling Gold
0.00
See Auzex Resources - 50/50 merger. UK court hearing Mar 8
1/03/2012 oOh!media
OOH
Champ III Funds
19.60
Suspended on court approval
11/10/2011 Sundance Resources
SDL
Hanlong Mining Investment
17.99
Reverse Takeover
17/02/2012 Millepede International
MPD
Angline Pastoral Pty Ltd
0.00
Angline and shareholders to control 67.6%. Vote early May
Foreshadowed Offers
28/02/2012 Billabong International
BBG
TPG
0.00
Discussions cease
23/12/2011 Gloucester Coal
GCL
Yancoal (Yanzhou Coal)
64.50
64.5% holder Noble Group in favour
28/02/2012 Goodman Fielder
GFF
Wilmar International
5.00-
Press speculation
16/02/2012 Ludowici
LDW
FLSmidth
22.00
Indicative 22% support for proposed scheme
10/02/2012 Ludowici
LDW
Weir Group
0.00
Indicative proposal
1/03/2012 New Hope Corp
NHC
Unnamed parties
0.00
Discussions terminated
6/02/2012 Spotless Group
SPT
Pacific Equity Partners
19.64
Non-exclusive due diligence

Source: News Bites

Related Articles