InvestSMART

It's an ad rush, but Grim Reaper's power is not being put to good effect

Who can forget the most powerful ad Australia has seen?
By · 29 Jun 2013
By ·
29 Jun 2013
comments Comments
Who can forget the most powerful ad Australia has seen?

It was the 60-second Grim Reaper television commercial that launched the government's AIDS prevention campaign in 1987.

This year marks the 30th anniversary of the discovery of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Before the Grim Reaper campaign, it was a taboo subject, only whispered about when the children had gone to bed.

In Australia, it was thought then that up to 50,000 people could be affected and it could kill more Australians than the 27,000 who died in World War II.

The federal government responded by commissioning a brilliant campaign that made Sydney copywriter Siimon Reynolds famous. He and others were brave enough to confront the truth without flinching.

The TV part of the campaign ran for only three weeks, although secondary media ran for a longer period. It was supported by about $2 million worth of advertising, which is really a drop in the ocean, but the effect will live on.

Research done after the three weeks found that 97 per cent of the people had seen it. Seventy per cent thought it had changed people's behaviour and 44 per cent had changed their own behaviour. Nothing had been as effective before it, and nothing since. Its message was simple in debunking the view that AIDS was a problem only for gay men and drug users.

The grave and threatening voice-over said "We know every single one of us could be devastated by it. In three years, 2000 of us will be dead", and the vision showed crying babies and children being knocked down by giant bowling balls. The screen was strewn with dead families. Many times in advertising, we refuse to say what might be embarrassing or uncomfortable. On this occasion, the advice was straightforward - "have one safe sexual partner and use a condom".

This was great advertising for a great purpose. It held a mirror up to society and made us face a massive problem and deal with it. It was a campaign of absolute leadership with frankness. Interestingly, both sides of politics can be proud that they made it a bipartisan matter for the good of the community and worked together without trying to take any political advantage - in stark contrast to events in Canberra this week.

The predicted 50,000 death toll did not eventuate. In fact, just short of 7000 Australians died, and since 1987, Australia's rate of HIV infection has been among the lowest in the world. It is 1.3 per 100,000, whereas in the US it is 14 per 100,000 - 10 times greater.

Twenty-six years later, it is important to recall this moment of strong bipartisan action and communication. Our society has many more problems than HIV.

Mental health is one that is still not fully understood or accepted. One in five people in Australia has a mental health problem. This huge number often suffers silently, alone or with their distraught families.

The burden is enormous and growing, yet we don't seem to be able to deal with it publicly in the way the Grim Reaper campaign so effectively combatted the problem of HIV. At a time when Australian advertising has taken the highest haul of awards this week at the famous Cannes advertising festival, I wonder if we're letting our world-class advertising minds loose on the things that really matter.

The Grim Reaper campaign was funded by the government. This year, more than $100 million will be spent by the federal government on advertising. The coming election will boost ad spending to record levels.

We are not doing the right thing by 23 million Australians if we don't use part of these massive budgets to deal effectively with the problems that silently lurk among us.

The Grim Reaper campaign and its message was simply one of people being honest with each other - there should be a whole lot more of that.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The Grim Reaper ad was a 60‑second television commercial launched by the Australian federal government in 1987 as part of an HIV/AIDS prevention campaign. It aimed to break the taboo around AIDS, give clear advice and raise public awareness.

Very effective by several measures: the TV part of the campaign ran for three weeks with secondary media continuing longer, about $2 million supported the campaign, research found 97% of people had seen it, 70% thought it changed people's behaviour and 44% said it changed their own behaviour.

The ad used stark imagery and a grave voice‑over to make its point and delivered simple, practical advice: have one safe sexual partner and use a condom. It also debunked the idea that AIDS was only a problem for specific groups.

The campaign helped change behaviour and public awareness. A predicted toll of 50,000 deaths did not eventuate; according to the article just short of 7,000 Australians died from HIV. Since 1987 Australia’s HIV infection rate has been among the lowest in the world.

The article states Australia’s HIV rate is about 1.3 per 100,000 people, compared with around 14 per 100,000 in the United States — roughly ten times higher than Australia’s rate as reported in the piece.

The article notes the federal government will spend more than $100 million on advertising this year, with election periods pushing ad spending to record levels. It suggests part of that budget should be used to tackle major public health issues like mental health.

Mental health affects about one in five Australians and often goes unspoken or untreated. The article argues that, like the Grim Reaper campaign for HIV, frank bipartisan public campaigns could help reduce stigma, change behaviour and get people the help they need.

Yes — both sides of politics supported the campaign and treated it as a bipartisan public‑health effort. The article highlights that leadership and frank public communication across party lines were key to the campaign’s success and suggests similar cooperation is needed for today’s social problems.