InvestSMART

Investor funfest in TSV's pass the parcel

Investors might not get much joy from the share price at TSV Holdings but they can have an awful lot of fun trying to work out who is on the board and in control of the company on any given day. Yesterday, for example, TSV lost an entire board, management team and major shareholder in the space of two hours.
By · 27 Oct 2011
By ·
27 Oct 2011
comments Comments
Investors might not get much joy from the share price at TSV Holdings but they can have an awful lot of fun trying to work out who is on the board and in control of the company on any given day. Yesterday, for example, TSV lost an entire board, management team and major shareholder in the space of two hours.

Shareholders ought not be too concerned, though, because TSV has stuck to its environmentally sound practice of recycling directors and major investors through its boardroom. New chairman, Robert Grey, only left the board in March this year. Grey founded and ran TSV's underlying business, Austco, which specialises in communications devices for the health industry. TSV bought his business in 2007 and he became managing director.

Last year, TSV reappointed as chairman David Carter, who headed the board when the company first listed on the ASX. Carter left TSV's board in late July this year, replaced by the seriously wealthy Brian Blythe - who many would remember as the one-time driving force behind catering, dry cleaning and plastic clothes-hanger company Spotless.

Blythe's family company Silchester Investments may, however, have set a new record for the shortest period of time for which a "cornerstone investor" has hung around after flogging their entire stake on Monday.

He, and his son, James, only arrived on the scene at the end of April, taking a placement of 14.11 million shares at 4? each as the first leg of a capital raising to try to put TSV back on a firmer financial footing. The placement was followed in May by a 1-for-6 equity raising, also at 4? a share, bravely underwritten by Lodge Corporate.

It was a monumental disaster. Of the 18 million shares on offer, only 3.72 million were taken up by investors - and 2.35 million of those were the Blythe family's entitlement. That means 93 per cent of the stock was knocked back.

The Blythes took the lion's share of the shortfall, giving them 22.8 million shares - the second-largest holding behind Bob Grey and his family - and what would seem to be an undemocratic two board seats out of four.

Insider hears that the Blythes had one idea of how to run the company, while others at TSV had a different plan. Insider understands they came in with their eyes open about the problems at the Tecsound arm of TSV, which had been draining the profitable Austco operation and was put into administration in June.

It came to a head this week when the Blythes sold their stock through UBS Securities at 3.75? - a price which would have been, at best, break-even on their investment.

Just after the market opened yesterday morning the Blythes's resignations were announced and barely 90 minutes later Grey, Austco executive Alex Talevski and significant shareholders Bill Brookes and Michael Howard came on board. The company also cut its overheads by accepting the resignations of chief executive Geoff Wanless and chief financial officer Jason D'Arcy, although the latter remains as company secretary. Expect another announcement this morning revealing which of the new directors bought the Blythes's shares.

TASTE TEST

Interesting to see Insurance Australia Group (IAG) head off to the annex, New Zealand, to test the appetite for an issue of corporate bonds to retail investors. IAG is planning to raise as much as $NZ150 million ($114.96 million) of unsecured subordinated bonds across the Tasman when its offer goes out next month.

The money is for the usual non-specific "general corporate purposes" and to give the insurer extra flexibility in managing its future refinancing requirements - such as the looming conversion of its reset preference shares in June next year.

Unlike the strangely quiet local market for such issues, and in spite of stated federal government desire, the New Zealand Stock Exchange's specialist bond market has about $NZ15 billion of securities.

That suggests IAG is doing a comparatively small raising as a "taste test", giving it options down the track. One consequence of the global financial crisis was banks regained the whip-hand as prime financiers to corporates like IAG because other forms of capital raisings dried up in an environment where risk was a dirty word. IAG's move continues the trend of Australian corporates going offshore to issue bonds in more sophisticated markets.

It also underlines that Australia is still a long way from fulfilling one of the key recommendations from the landmark 2009 (Mark) Johnson report into making Australia a financial centre - to develop a listed, retail corporate bond market.

With the huge flow of (compulsory) cash through the doors of superannuation funds, though, there would seem to be no shortage of potential investment appetite - particularly as a recent Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) study found Australian funds direct on average 11 per cent to fixed interest investments and more than 50 per cent to equities, which is almost the opposite of the OECD average of 50 per cent of money going to fixed interest.

HAVEN FOR HAVES

IAG is not the only financial services group trying to tap investor appetite for low-risk, certain income investments. While most of the major banks might have peeled back for their aggressive pursuit of retail deposits with attractive interest rates, one financial institution surprised itself recently.

It put up a six-month term deposit, offering perhaps as much as 8 per cent fully franked, to its moneyed client base as a way of providing a more certain income stream amid whip-sawing financial markets. Insider hears that instead of pulling in the $100 million hoped for, it had applications for three times as much which just goes to show that the "haves" are just as leery as the "wish we hads" of punting their money in these conditions.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

TSV Holdings saw an unusually fast shake-up: in the space of a couple of hours the company announced major resignations and new appointments. The Blythe family resigned, then Bob (Robert) Grey, Austco executive Alex Talevski and significant shareholders Bill Brookes and Michael Howard joined the board. TSV also accepted the resignations of CEO Geoff Wanless and CFO Jason D’Arcy (who remains company secretary). The article describes this as part of ongoing, frequent changes in control and board composition at TSV.

The Blythes (via Silchester Investments) came in as a cornerstone investor with a placement and then took a big chunk of the shortfall in a subsequent equity raising, becoming one of the largest shareholders with about 22.8 million shares behind Bob Grey’s holding. They then sold their entire stake through UBS Securities at a reported price, triggering resignations and a rapid reshuffle of the board. Their quick entry and exit changed ownership balance and contributed to governance uncertainty for everyday shareholders.

TSV ran a two-step capital raising (a placement followed by a 1-for-6 entitlement offer underwritten by Lodge Corporate). Of the 18 million shares on offer in the entitlement, only 3.72 million were taken up by investors (about 93% not taken up), leaving the Blythes to take most of the shortfall. For investors, that weak demand signals limited market confidence, potential dilution for existing holders, and reliance on major shareholders to support recapitalisations.

According to the article, Tecsound (an arm of TSV) had been draining the profitable Austco business and was placed into administration in June. For investors this highlights operational risk inside TSV — a loss-making division can hurt the group’s overall financial performance and may be a driver of the management and ownership changes described.

Robert (Bob) Grey founded and ran Austco, the underlying business TSV acquired in 2007. He previously served as managing director and, after a recent series of moves, returned to a leading role as chairman. The article notes he and his family are the largest shareholders, so his involvement is material to governance and strategy at TSV.

IAG is planning a potential issue of unsecured subordinated corporate bonds to New Zealand retail investors of up to about NZ$150 million. The funds are for general corporate purposes and to give the insurer flexibility around upcoming refinancing (including a reset preference share conversion). For retail investors this is an example of a large Australian corporate using offshore retail bond markets to raise funding.

The article explains that post-global financial crisis the domestic market for listed retail corporate bonds in Australia remains underdeveloped, so companies often go to more established markets (like New Zealand) where specialist bond markets are larger. This trend reflects limited domestic options for corporates seeking retail bond investors and the lingering dominance of banks as prime financiers.

Yes — the article gives examples of solid demand for certain income products. It mentions a financial institution that offered a six‑month term deposit (advertised up to around 8% fully franked) and received about three times the applications it expected, showing appetite from wealthier clients for certain short‑term, lower‑risk income. The piece also cites an OECD study noting Australian funds put a relatively small share into fixed interest (about 11%) and a larger share into equities, indicating structural differences in allocation but also a potential pool of retail demand for reliable income products.