The securities regulator will push ahead with a review of investment platforms that collectively house more than $100 billion of superannuation savings.
THE securities regulator will push ahead with a review of investment platforms that collectively house more than $100 billion of superannuation savings.
The review is likely to boost rules protecting investors that have savings sitting on platforms, giving them the same rights as though they directly owned the products.
It could also pave the way to make it easier for fund managers to have investment products listed on an investment platform, a move that could pressure returns of platform providers.
Used by financial planners, investment platforms are the link, or ''hub'', in the chain between the consumer and underlying fund product. With the market dominated by the big banks, platforms offer benefits to financial planners, given they can easily manage the investment portfolios of clients.
The issue of control of the platform market became a sticking point with the competition regulator when NAB attempted its $14 billion move on AXA Asia Pacific. This ultimately forced NAB to shelve its bid for the wealth manager.
Financial advisers usually use two platforms to manage client funds, but sometimes three. At least 50 per cent of advisers use Commonwealth Bank-owned First Choice, followed by 30 per cent that use Westpac's BT Wrap. Among the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's proposals, platform operators would be required to meet standards on corporate structures and compliance issues.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What is the investment platform review announced by the securities regulator?
The securities regulator (ASIC) is pressing ahead with a review of investment platforms that collectively hold more than $100 billion in superannuation savings to examine how platforms operate and whether stronger rules are needed for investors.
How could the review change investor protections on investment platforms?
The review is likely to boost rules protecting investors with platform-held savings, potentially giving them the same rights as if they directly owned the underlying investment products.
Could the review make it easier for fund managers to list products on platforms?
Yes — the review could pave the way for fund managers to more easily have investment products listed on platforms, a change that might increase competition but could also put pressure on platform providers' returns.
Who typically uses investment platforms and why are they important?
Financial planners commonly use investment platforms as the 'hub' between consumers and the underlying fund products because platforms make it easy for advisers to manage clients’ investment portfolios.
Which platform providers and banks dominate the Australian platform market?
The market is dominated by the big banks. At least 50% of advisers use Commonwealth Bank–owned FirstChoice and about 30% use Westpac’s BT Wrap, according to the article.
How did competition concerns affect NAB's attempted purchase of AXA Asia Pacific?
Control of the platform market became a sticking point with the competition regulator when NAB tried a $14 billion bid for AXA Asia Pacific, and those concerns ultimately forced NAB to shelve the takeover attempt.
How many platforms do financial advisers usually use to manage client funds?
Financial advisers usually use two platforms to manage client funds and sometimes use three.
What standards might platform operators be required to meet under ASIC's proposals?
ASIC’s proposals would require platform operators to meet standards relating to corporate structures and compliance issues to improve governance and investor protection.