InvestSMART

Home truths

Emma Challands is putting her faith and her cash into real estate, writes Penny Pryor.
By · 19 Feb 2012
By ·
19 Feb 2012
comments Comments
Emma Challands is putting her faith and her cash into real estate, writes Penny Pryor.

PROJECT engineer Emma Challands would like to be in a position to retire before 40. That doesn't necessarily mean she will - she loves her job in building and is studying for a masters in construction management to further her career - but her financial goals are clear.

"In a nutshell, my plan over the next 10 years is to buy basically two properties every year," she says.

She already has one investment property and is looking at buying another in the middle of next year. Emma plans to sell half her portfolio of properties as she goes, to pay off debt and use the rent as a passive income stream. You can read about her progress here mypropertyjourney.com/about/.

Emma has always been interested in building things. As a child she loved Lego and as an older teenager it was Sim City. Having a father in development also helped.

"I think the main reason I got interested in property was my dad does development as a bit of a hobby," she says.

Developing might be on the cards but for now Emma wants to know if her income-based strategy will work.

"My main focus is the western suburbs of Melbourne - still in close proximity to the city but obviously a lot lower in price," she says.

We asked three financial planners to overhaul Emma's finances and suggest some strategies.

PERSONAL DETAILS

Name Emma Challands

Age 27

Occupations Project engineer

Salary $80,000

ASSETS

Property one-bedroom unit valued at $145,000

Super $10,000

Investments (managed funds or shares) 3149 shares in AIW valued at $200

Cash in the bank $15,000

LIABILITIES

Mortgage debts $127,000

Credit card debts $150

Other loans N/A

HECS debts $45,000

THE AVERAGE WEEK

INCOME (NET)

Salaries $1174

Rental income (a week) $170

TOTAL $1344

EXPENSES

Rent $262

Home loan $208 (on investment property)

Investment property costs $43 (maintenance/rates etc on property)

Living expenses $200

Insurance policies Rental insurance, landlord insurance, health insurance (hospital and top extras), car insurance (fully comp) = $50

Other $200

TOTAL $963

Think about paying HECS

SUZANNE HADDAN

BFG Financial Services

It's great that Emma does not have high-interest loans outstanding such as a personal loan or big credit card debt. And the interest on the investment loan is tax-deductible, which reduces the annual interest cost from about 6.5 per cent to about 4.45 per cent.

Recommended strategies depend on Emma's plans. Assuming Emma will at some stage buy a home she should deposit her savings into an offset account against the investment loan. This effectively earns her 4.45 per cent after tax on the funds but keeps them available.

She could get a better return by making voluntary lump sum payments off the HECS debt for a discount of 5 per cent on amounts above $500. If Emma repaid, say, $2000 her HECS debt would fall $2100. If she pays before June 1 each year she will also avoid indexation of the debt, which could save 2 per cent to 3 per cent more.

The downside is the amount is then not available to meet other goals such as buying a home.

Protecting assets and income is also important. As a minimum this should include income protection in case she could not work and total and permanent disability, generally combined with death cover, to pay a lump sum should she be disabled and unable to work again.

Borrow wisely to profit

MIKE INGHAM

Obelisk Advisors

Borrowing to invest in residential property has been a very successful strategy for many Australians over the years. However, it is not a sure-fire recipe for success. The tax benefits of gearing are often highlighted but you need growth in the value of your property investments to make the strategy work. So selecting the right property is very important. One-bedroom units are often a realistic first step on the property ladder but larger units and houses tend to have greater potential for capital gain.

Emma seems to be in a sound cash-flow position with surplus income of about $10,000 a year. Given her loan of $127,000 represents a relatively high 87.6 per cent of the value of the investment property, I would suggest she increases her loan repayments by about $400 per month to build up the equity in the property and reduce the loan-to-value (LVR) ratio below 80 per cent.

She needs to make sure cash savings are held in a loan-offset account that can reduce the interest charged on the loan balance. When the LVR is below 80 per cent, she should progressively build up cash levels in the offset account for her next investment.

Stop for a reality check

PAUL MORAN

Paul Moran Financial Planning

Emma, like many people, dreams of retiring at 40 with a property portfolio. Unfortunately, we often need a bit of a reality check. The investment property dream relies heavily on prices continuing to rise quickly, allowing you to use the equity created as a deposit on the next property.

In this publication and others recently, the talk is of property prices remaining, at best, flat for the time being, which means Emma will have trouble with her strategy. At the moment, she has usable equity of about $17,000 in the property assuming it is valued like others in the area at about $180,000. Usable equity is the amount over the 80 per cent the bank requires you to offer.

If Emma adds her savings she is still a little short of the deposit required to buy another property. This would use all of her savings buffer never a good idea and we haven't included purchasing costs.

Because she lives and works in Melbourne, I would suggest she continues to save and look to make her next purchase somewhere near the city. It could still be an investment property but at some point she will need somewhere to call home. She should get tax advice on how to minimise future capital gains on the new property, perhaps by moving in.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Emma Challands is a 27‑year‑old project engineer earning about $80,000 a year who wants to be in a position to retire before 40. Her plan (outlined in the article) is to build a property portfolio by buying roughly two properties a year for the next decade, keeping rental income as passive income and selling about half the portfolio later to pay off debt.

According to the article, Emma owns a one‑bedroom investment unit (valued about $145,000), has $10,000 in super, 3,149 shares in AIW valued at about $200, and $15,000 cash. Her liabilities include a $127,000 mortgage, $150 credit‑card debt and $45,000 HECS. Net income plus rent is about $1,344 per week and her listed weekly expenses total about $963, leaving an approximate surplus of $10,000 a year.

Planners in the article recommend depositing savings into a loan offset account attached to the investment loan. This reduces interest charged on the loan so the funds effectively earn the after‑tax cost of the loan (the article cites about 4.45% after tax), while keeping the cash accessible for future deposits or emergencies.

The article explains a trade‑off: Suzanne Haddan notes making voluntary HECS payments can be attractive because amounts above $500 attract a roughly 5%bonus (repaying $2,000 would reduce the debt by about $2,100) and paying before June 1 can avoid indexation, saving another 2–3%. The downside is those funds won’t be available for a home deposit or other goals, so the choice depends on Emma’s priorities.

Mike Ingham in the article suggests Emma could increase her loan repayments by about $400 a month to build equity and reduce the loan‑to‑value ratio (LVR) below 80%. Lowering the LVR should give her better access to borrowing for a future investment while reducing risk.

The planners recommend protecting income and assets. At minimum they suggest income protection in case she cannot work, plus total and permanent disability (TPD) cover generally combined with death cover to provide a lump sum if she were permanently disabled or deceased. The article also notes Emma already holds rental, landlord, health and car insurance.

Paul Moran cautions in the article that this strategy depends heavily on continued strong property price growth so you can extract equity to fund further purchases. With recent commentary suggesting prices may be flat, Emma’s usable equity (about $17,000 assuming a slightly higher valuation) and savings are likely short of the deposit and costs for another purchase, so the plan may need adjusting.

The article’s advisers recommend choosing property with good potential for capital growth (houses and larger units often outperform one‑bedroom units) and keeping proximity to the city in mind if she may eventually live there. They also suggest not using all savings as a deposit (retain a buffer for costs) and getting tax advice on minimising future capital gains—for example, considering moving into a property at some point to reduce CGT.