Healthy scepticism is the best strategy over the long term
Ten Network
The struggling free-to-air network has polarised top stockbroking analysts. The lowest valuation is 20¢ while the highest is 38¢. Meanwhile, investors have plumped for a price near the middle of the valuation range at 30¢, down from 39¢ in just a month.
The problem analysts face is that Ten's profits are so depressed in 2013 their valuations have to be based on the 2014 and 2015 earnings. These forecasts will depend heavily on two factors - the new management's ability to lift viewer ratings from the current disappointing 22 per cent and the strength of a recovery in the free-to-air advertising market.
There is an elevated chance the management can increase ratings but there are serious doubts that free-to-air, with the onset of new media platforms, can mirror the rebound of previous cycles.
At 30¢ a share, Ten is valued at $770 million with no debt. In 2014, the company is forecast to earn somewhere between $60 million and $80 million before interest and tax (EBIT). This means it will still be trading on somewhere between a 9.5 and 13 times EBIT multiple, hardly a bargain.
Mining services
Last week we talked about whether it was time to re-enter the mining and mining service companies. The conclusion was that small miners and, moreover, mining service plays, were difficult investments because of their lack of transparency and liquidity.
Little did we know that recently floated Calibre Group and Ausdrill would oblige by downgrading earnings, highlighting how difficult the mining service industry can be.
Last week Calibre slashed its earnings forecasts. The story was less about revenue and more about serious margin compression.
Before the downgrade, Calibre was printing earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) margins of about 11 per cent. In the current half that number will decrease to about 5 per cent.
Based on the revised earnings, Calibre is trading on an EBITDA multiple of seven times. Even after the huge slump in its share price after the earnings downgrade, it looks expensive.
For the plethora of service companies, the concentration
of large customers is a big deficiency and investors would
be wise to stay away from the industry, with the prospect of more downgrades and company collapses to come.
SAI Global
The standards group has been one of the worst performers on the market since the middle of 2012, following multiple earnings downgrades. The stock, though, has kicked 15 per cent in the past three weeks, with the company confirming its full-year guidance of EBITDA of between $100 million and $105 million.
Institutional investors that concentrate on small companies have always rated SAI highly because of its robust business model and growth prospects.
But the company has proved anything but consistent, with volatile earnings and disappointing returns.
In most of its presentations, SAI has emphasised its revenue and earnings-per-share growth but in reality it has increased debt to acquire businesses, only to see the overall return on assets drop from about 17 per cent in 2006 to the current level of 10 to 11 per cent.
In other words, for every dollar of capital invested in the business the return has slumped from 17¢ to just 10¢. Investors should monitor the company closely to see if it can reverse the disturbing decline in returns over the past five years.
matthewjkidman@gmail.com
Fairfax Media takes no responsibility for stock recommendations.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The article encourages a positive long‑term view of stocks but stresses that the best returns come from practising 'healthy scepticism' — avoiding certain companies and sectors that show persistent problems like weak earnings, high debt or poor transparency.
Analysts’ valuations for Ten Network range from 20¢ to 38¢ a share, with investors recently valuing it near 30¢ (down from 39¢ a month earlier). At 30¢ the company is valued at about $770 million with no debt. Forecast 2014 EBIT of $60–$80 million implies an EBIT multiple of roughly 9.5–13 times, which the article says is 'hardly a bargain.'
Ten’s 2013 profits were depressed, so forecasts rely on 2014–15 earnings. Those forecasts depend on the new management lifting viewer ratings from the current disappointing 22% and on a recovery in the free‑to‑air advertising market — both of which are uncertain given the rise of new media platforms.
The article recommends caution. It highlights that small miners and mining‑service companies can be hard to value because of limited transparency and liquidity, and recent downgrades (Calibre, Ausdrill) show how quickly earnings and margins can deteriorate — making the sector risky for everyday investors.
Calibre recently slashed earnings forecasts due mainly to margin compression: historical EBITDA margins near 11% are expected to fall to about 5% in the current half. Even after a share price slump, the business is trading on an EBITDA multiple around seven times, which the article suggests still looks expensive.
Key risks include heavy reliance on a few large customers, margin pressure, earnings volatility, limited transparency and liquidity — all of which increase the chance of further downgrades or company failures in the sector.
SAI Global has been a poor performer since mid‑2012 after multiple downgrades, though the stock rose about 15% in the last three weeks after confirming full‑year EBITDA guidance of $100–$105 million. Institutional investors like its business model, but the company has shown inconsistent earnings and has increased debt for acquisitions, with return on assets falling from ~17% in 2006 to about 10–11% now — so investors should monitor whether management can reverse that decline.
Practical steps from the article: look beyond short‑term rallies, check whether earnings are sustainable (not just one‑off guidance), examine dependence on cyclical markets (like free‑to‑air advertising or mining), watch margins and debt levels, avoid sectors with poor transparency or liquidity, and be wary of companies with concentrated customer bases.

