InvestSMART

Forget talk of gloom, this is all boom

Politicians like to remind us how tough things are, but a report by the British trade union movement suggests otherwise.
By · 9 Mar 2013
By ·
9 Mar 2013
comments Comments
Politicians like to remind us how tough things are, but a report by the British trade union movement suggests otherwise.

Whether or not you are down on your luck, after listening to our politicians going on about cost of living pressures and how hard it is to make things meet, you walk away feeling that much poorer.

It's little wonder that we have apparently turned into a nation of savers, fearing what dreadful event might be around the next corner.

But a report by Britain's Trades Union Congress suggests we should get a grip. It found that Australia's real wages growth, after taking inflation into account, rose by 6.9 per cent between 2007 and 2011, and right through the upheaval of the 2008-09 global financial crisis.

That compares favourably with 5.4 per cent growth in Canada, while pay actually fell 4.5 per cent in Britain during that same period.

And let's not forgot the recent official inflation figures from the Bureau of Statistics - an annual consumer price index rise of a tame 2.2 per cent, and a cost of living index for employees of a mere 1.1 per cent increase over 2012.

But perhaps consumers are looking at the facts rather than listening to our national representatives.

This week's retail spending figures showed shoppers had a definite spring in their step at the start of the year, spending a record $21.6 billion in January. This was a 0.9 per cent increase compared to December, and the biggest monthly rise since June last year.

Such exuberance coincides with more buoyant consumer confidence, which now stands at its highest level in more than two years. Meanwhile, there was more positive news on the broader economy with the national accounts showing a respectable 3.1 per cent expansion during 2012, close to its long-term trend.

While the resource sector remains a key driver of growth for now, with still only glimmers of hope from the non-mining fraternity, at least the economy overall continues to expand, which is always good for the employment outlook.

In fact, the economy has now been recession-free for 21 continuous calendar years, unheard of among other major advanced economies in the present global climate. It passed this milestone for financial years last June.

Commonwealth Securities chief economist Craig James described it as a "Goldilocks economy" - not too hot, not too cold, in fact just about right.

"Why our good economic circumstances aren't trumpeted more defies rational explanation," Mr James says. "Inflation is under control, unemployment is low, the economy is growing at a 'normal' pace and our government deficit and debt levels are low compared with other advanced nations."

Treasurer Wayne Swan did his bit talking up the economy during his national accounts media conference, pointing out that Australia is growing more than four times the average of member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. "This is a pretty impressive outcome," Mr Swan said.

"Over a 30-year period, governments have put in place the sort of policies which have supported our economy, put in place the reforms which have built the prosperity for the future."

But he also spent a lot of the 30-minute conference discussing the comparison of real gross domestic product - the usual focus of growth - and nominal GDP, as did shadow treasurer Joe Hockey's rebuttal.

In a rare turn of affairs, nominal GDP at an annual rate of just 2 per cent has now undershot real GDP for the past three quarters, something that hasn't occurred in 50 years.

The long-term trend for nominal GDP is 6 to 6.5 per cent.

It explains why company profits are down because the value of our goods and services [nominal] are below that of output [real], which Mr Swan blamed on a high Australian dollar and declining terms of trade.

Mr Hockey, unsurprisingly, just blamed it on government mismanagement. If your eyes haven't glazed over already, Finance Minister Penny Wong took up this topic, along with the government's budget strategy, during a speech in Melbourne.

"Nominal growth is what drives profits across the economy and consequently government revenues," she said.

"In light of this, the economically responsible course of action is to maintain spending restraint but not continue to cut to offset the revenue writedowns if that would risk employment and growth."

No doubt we will hear more in the run-up to the May 14 budget, if not all the way to the election on September 14.

Explanations of the nominal/real GDP relationship may be interesting to the pointy heads in our community, but is it really a vote winner?

Perhaps we should just take a leaf out of former British prime minister Harold Macmillan's book, who said in a 1957 speech: "Let us be frank about it, most of our people have never had it so good."

It would certainly enliven the economic debate.

AAP

6.9%

Amount Australia's real wages grew (2007 to 2011)

4.5%

Amount pay fell in Britain during that same period.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The article argues the economy looks strong on several measures: real wages rose 6.9% between 2007 and 2011, official inflation (CPI) was a tame 2.2% with a 1.1% employee cost-of-living rise in 2012, retail spending hit a record $21.6 billion in January, national accounts showed 3.1% expansion in 2012, and Australia had been recession-free for 21 continuous calendar years — prompting some economists to label it a “Goldilocks economy.”

Real wages rising 6.9% (2007–2011) alongside relatively low inflation (CPI 2.2% and employee cost-of-living up 1.1% in 2012) suggest households’ purchasing power improved, which can support consumer spending and reduce downside risks for consumer-facing businesses — a positive structural backdrop investors should note.

Stronger retail spending (a record $21.6 billion in January, up 0.9% month‑on‑month) and the highest consumer confidence in more than two years point to firmer consumer demand. For investors, that signals potential tailwinds for retail, consumer discretionary and services stocks, and it supports the broader employment and economic outlook.

The article explains company profits can be down when nominal GDP growth is weak relative to real GDP. Nominal GDP (the value of output) was running at about a 2% annual rate and undershot real GDP for three consecutive quarters — reducing the reported value of goods and services. Officials pointed to a high Australian dollar and declining terms of trade as contributors to lower nominal revenues and profits.

Real GDP measures the volume of production adjusted for inflation, while nominal GDP measures the money value of that output. Nominal growth drives company profits and government revenues, so when nominal GDP lags (the article notes a 2% annual rate versus a long‑term trend of 6–6.5%), it can press on corporate earnings and fiscal receipts even if real activity is expanding.

The resource sector is described as the key driver of growth at the time, with only glimmers of improvement in non‑mining sectors. That means investors should be aware that overall economic strength may be concentrated in resources, so diversification across sectors is important if investors want exposure beyond resource-driven gains.

The article flags upcoming fiscal and political milestones: a federal budget on May 14 and a national election on September 14. Debates around nominal vs real GDP, government spending restraint and possible cuts were central — all of which can influence markets, government policy risk and investor sentiment.

Officials and economists in the article described the economy positively — Craig James called it a “Goldilocks economy” and Treasurer Wayne Swan noted Australia was growing more than four times the OECD average. That upbeat framing, combined with stable inflation, low unemployment and long streak without recession, can bolster investor confidence, though debates over fiscal settings and currency/terms‑of‑trade pressures remain relevant risks.