Don't dismiss a 2014 'super' El Nino just yet

While the odds still favour an El Nino, could it quickly become a super El Nino like in 1982? The recent changes in temperature make it more likely, but we’ll have to keep watching to know for sure.

The Conversation

It looks like it’s all over bar the shouting for the chance of this year bringing on a “super” El Nino. Or is it?

The Bureau of Meteorology has brought the odds of an El Nino event down to 50 per cent, from 70 per cent. Even if it hits, most authorities are forecasting a weak to moderate event. Not that this should make seasonal weather watchers any less wary. Even a moderate El Nino can significantly affect Australia’s rainfall.

But are we right to dismiss the chances of a super El Nino this early in the season? We have been caught out before. The second-largest El Nino event on modern record, which hit in 1982-83, developed rather slowly before rapidly picking up in late August.

There have been some recent signs that the development of El Nino conditions may be picking up again, so perhaps we shouldn’t write off a strong El Nino event just yet.

A prediction for a weak El Nino does not mean a strong El Nino is not a possibility.

How do El Ninos form?

Before we go any further, we need to look at how El Ninos come about. For an El Nino to be declared, the surface waters to the east of the Pacific dateline need to be substantially warmer than normal.

Generally the eastern Pacific is a cold and dry region. For this reason the air close to the sea surface tends to create a cool, high-pressure region (colder air is more dense).

To the west of the dateline, the sea surface and atmosphere are warmer. The rising air over the western Pacific creates a low-pressure region close to the sea surface.

Figure 1: Normally, winds across the Pacific flow east to west, with cold water dominating the eastern Pacific. 

Source: NOAA-Wikimedia

Figure 2: During an El Nino, warm water spreads right across the Pacific Ocean, and the winds reverse. 

Source: NOAA-Wikimedia

Air generally moves from high-pressure regions to low-pressure regions, so this pressure difference across the Pacific drives the trade winds. The greater the difference in pressure, the stronger the trade winds, from east to west.

To develop an El Nino, changes in ocean temperatures aren’t enough by themselves. The atmosphere must respond and in turn cause changes to the pressure zones above the sea surface.

The change in atmospheric circulation then amplifies the change in ocean temperature. This is what researchers mean when they talk about positive feedback between the ocean and the atmosphere.

The index we use to measure the difference in pressure between regions, and consequently the strength of the trade winds, is the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI). The precise measurement for the index is the difference in sea-level pressure between Darwin and Tahiti.

A positive index means there is a high pressure east of the dateline and low pressure west of the dateline, generating easterly trade winds.

A negative index is the reverse of this normal condition, meaning warm water and low pressure in the east and cooler water with a high pressure in the west. This negative index can reverse the direction of trade winds, creating the conditions that generate El Nino events.

Chaotic winds

These exact conditions emerged earlier this year. Instead of the normally west-flowing winds, three eastward-flowing wind events pushed heat, which was accumulating in the western Pacific, towards the east.

As a result, the amount of warm water across the Pacific Ocean – the fuel reserve for El Nino – increased rapidly, reaching a temperature just below that of the 1997-1998 Super El Nino. By May, warming of the eastern Pacific was well established. The Pacific Ocean looked primed for a potentially big El Nino.

But through June and July the waters in the central and eastern Pacific cooled – although they are still warmer than normal. This cooling was brought about by the return of strong trade winds. This led to a switch from a negative to a positive SOI in April.

At the same time, the volume of warm water across the equator decreased rapidly.

If these events persist over the next few months, we are probably on track for a very weak El Nino.

However, the latest update from NOAA indicates some anomalies have been weakening the easterly winds. The Southern Oscillation Index has changed again from positive to negative; the upper Pacific Ocean is warming, which could spread into the eastern Pacific over the coming months.

These are exactly the kinds of conditions needed to re-energise the growth of this year’s El Nino. Chaotic processes in the system can rapidly amplify this growth once the positive feedback kicks in.

Could 2014 match the strongest El Ninos?

To put the possibilities in perspective, let’s compare how the 2014 development tracks with past El Nino events. The diagram below indicates the 2014 trajectory is still within the trajectories of past El Nino events since the 1982-83 extreme El Nino.

In fact, earlier this year the evolution was closely following the development of the 1997-98 super El Nino.

Figure 3: The potential 2014 El Nino (dashed green line) closely matches the 1982 super El Nino (black line) on some variables.

Despite the slowing down of this current event, the July average temperatures are still comparable to 1982. In particular, as you can see, the SOI has also recently turned negative again – indicating a possible El Nino.

Although not as dramatic as this year, the 1982-83 event also showed a weakening in May to July. The 1982 anomalies then picked up rapidly to deliver the second-strongest El Nino in modern record.

While the current situation still favours an El Nino, could it quickly become a super El Nino like in 1982? The recent changes in temperature make it more likely, but we’ll have to keep watching to know for sure.

Link to changes in Atlantic, Indian oceans

In April, the strengthening Pacific east-to-west trade winds coincided with warmer-than-normal sea surface temperatures around Indonesia (the Indo-Pacific region) and the tropical Atlantic.

Figure 4: Sea temperatures of 2014 (top) compared with 1982 (bottom). The Indo-Pacific and Atlantic oceans in May and June were colder in 1982, favouring an El Nino.

Studies show that warmer temperatures in these oceans tend to strengthen the east-to-west trade winds – which works against the formation of El Nino. These effects are also demonstrated separately in two studies published last week in Nature Climate Change journal.

In 1982, with a building super El Nino, these regions were colder than normal. Recently, the equatorial Atlantic is no longer warm; in fact it is colder, which again makes El Nino more likely.

Figure 5: Sea temperatures in July this year show the tropical Atlantic Ocean has cooled.

Some warming still lingers around the Indian Ocean but this pattern is only forecast to last until August and to return to a neutral state in spring.

‘Significant’ El Nino still possible

While a strong El Nino is now less likely, a significant event is still possible as long as the eastern Pacific remains warm through August. This warming has the potential to overcome the effect of Indian Ocean warming, which would normally dampen the development of an El Nino.

If the eastern Pacific continues to cool while the central Pacific remains warm, we may see the development of an El Nino Modoki – a different form of El Nino with warm anomalies peaking in the central Pacific rather than in the usual east.

Regardless how this pans out over the next month, it is important to be aware that a weak El Nino can still have a significant impact on Australia. Droughts and bushfires in Australia have been severe during moderate El Nino years.

Meanwhile our colleagues in the United States could finally get some rain in the drought-stricken regions along the west coast, a situation that will no doubt be welcomed.

Agus Santoso is a senior research associate at UNSW Australia

Agus Santoso received funding from CSIRO.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article here.