Auction houses slug it out in battle for top-dollar sales
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
Competition is intensifying at the top end of the Australian art auction market as firms like Menzies Art Brands, Sotheby’s, Deutscher and Hackett and Bonhams chase premium works and top-dollar sales. Auction houses are adjusting schedules, lot mixes and marketing strategies to capture scarce high-value works, while supply and demand for premium pieces remain the key factors shaping the battle for market share.
Menzies Art Brands plans to reduce its stand-alone sales from four to three a year, halve the number of lots per sale and only list works valued above $80,000 in its main sales. The aim is to prioritise margins over volumes, give more time to source major works (including those by Brett Whiteley) and expand into the primary market. For investors this signals a sharper focus on fewer, higher‑value lots at Menzies' marquee auctions.
Lawson Menzies will handle works valued under $80,000, running four auctions a year and targeting single‑owner collections. Currently it sells works in the $1,000–$40,000 range three times a year; management expects turnover per Lawson sale to rise (from about $1.5 million to an estimated $3.5 million) as it focuses on lower‑priced lots and more frequent sales.
Top‑end works are a small but valuable slice of most catalogues. For example, in one 140‑lot sale cited in the article, 19 lots carried $100,000‑plus estimates totalling about $8.7 million, while 61 lots (44%) were estimated at $20,000 or less. That mix shows high value is concentrated in relatively few lots.
Yes. Deutscher and Hackett, for example, achieved a record price of $2.5 million for Arthur Streeton’s 1888 Settler’s Camp, and Sotheby’s realised strong prices for major works despite criticism that some estimates were pitched high. These results show that demand can still produce standout outcomes at auction.
Artists singled out include Brett Whiteley—described as a 'centre of gravity' in the secondary market—and major lots such as Whiteley’s 1985 mixed‑media Sloping up on the Olgas (1) (With Crow) and Jeffrey Smart’s 1971 Holiday, both carrying $1 million estimates in the cited sale. These high‑profile works are focal points for top‑end bidding.
The article notes that onerous rules have deterred some superannuation funds from investing in art, despite auction houses targeting institutional and high‑net‑worth buyers. Regulatory and practical hurdles mean super funds are not universally participating in the art investment market.
For everyday investors, the auction landscape suggests a two‑tier market: a small, competitive top end where a few players vie for premium works and where prices can be strong, and a larger volume of lower‑value lots available through houses like Lawson Menzies. The shift toward listing more established contemporary artists at auction (as some galleries close) may create new buying opportunities, but investors should be mindful that top‑end supply is limited and competition can be intense.

