Ask Noel
Financial advisers suggest the importance of a broad-based approach to maximise the chances of financial security. I note from one superannuation website that diversified bonds have offered the best return over five years (8.37 per cent a year with an anticipated negative year every 20 years) compared with the balanced option (2.67 per cent a year with an anticipated two to three negative returns every 20 years). It makes me wonder about the wisdom of a broad-based portfolio (for example balanced) compared with a targeted approach (for example diversified bonds). Do you think that a period of five years is too short to tell longer-term trends?
Ashley Owen of Philo Capital points out that diversified bonds have done better than treasuries over the past year because of the higher spreads on corporate/high-yield bonds, and because credit spreads have tightened.
But in a crisis (such as in 2008, 1974, etc), treasuries do better because credit spreads blow out but Treasury yields collapse. In the early stages of booms, while inflation is still low and credit spreads tighten, both corporate bonds and treasuries do well. This happened last year.
Bonds have done very well over the past five years, but over the very long term a balanced fund should always beat a bond fund (diversified or concentrated) because bonds have no inflation hedge, no prospects of real growth and no tax advantages.
I am about to start a pension from my self-managed super fund (SMSF). I am required to withdraw a minimum of 4 per cent of the fund value, but it's not clear to me exactly when the value is determined. Is it tax-year-end valuation, with the 4 per cent applicable for the next tax year?
For pensions already in operation it's the pension account balance at July 1 each year; a pro-rated pension payment must be calculated and paid for pensions started part-way through a financial year. This is done via a day's calculation method, for example if there are 180 days left in the financial year the equation would be:
Pension Purchase Price x (180/365 x 4%).
Note there is a 25 per cent reduction in the required minimum payment this financial year. So for people under age 65, their minimum is 3 per cent for the current year.
We received a notice that we had gone over the concessional contributions cap. I was aware of the cap but had forgotten my husband's life insurance premiums come out of the super fund and are included as concessional contributions.
He is 54 and the premium is skyrocketing. Between the compulsory super guarantee contribution and the insurance premium, we will be almost at the $25,000 cap this year. We will reduce the insurance cover, as we don't need as much any more and may even drop it entirely over the next a few years. We would like to make the maximum concessional contributions without the premium taking up so much of the cap. Are there any alternative strategies?
The premiums would count towards his concessional contribution cap if funded with pre-tax contributions. One strategy is to fund the premium from his existing super balances or after-tax contributions.
The simplest way out is probably to use the entire $25,000 allowed as a concessional contribution to make a salary-sacrificed contribution to super and then simply pay the insurance from the fund. As you point out, you may be in a position where you could reduce the insurance or eliminate it.
Jump on a good rate while you can
The explainer
I'm a 23-year-old student going back to university for three years (where my doctorate does not qualify for Centrelink support). I have set aside $4000 for living costs in 2013 (I am lucky to live at home and hope to have a small income from a part-time job). I have $25,000 in a savings account earning 3.25 per cent a year. I have investigated a term-deposit option earning 4.6 per cent for a year. Do you have any other suggestions for investing the money for a year, such as in a cash-management trust? (I am investing it for only one year because I might need to access the money for university or living costs in 2014.)
Congratulations on being such a good money manager. With interest rates trending downwards, it's hard to go past 4.6 per cent for 12 months. Just make sure the institution is a secure one.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
A five-year outperformance by diversified bonds doesn't automatically mean you should switch. The article notes diversified bonds returned about 8.37% p.a. over five years versus a balanced option at about 2.67% p.a., but shorter windows can reflect credit-spread conditions rather than long-term trends. Your choice should depend on your risk tolerance, time horizon and need for inflation protection — balanced portfolios tend to outperform bonds over very long periods because bonds lack inflation hedging and real growth potential.
Yes — five years can be misleading. Market conditions (like tightening credit spreads or higher corporate spreads) can make bonds look superior over medium terms. The article suggests five years may capture a cycle but not translate into long-term reality; historically, balanced funds should beat bond-only funds over very long horizons because bonds offer limited growth and no inflation hedge.
The article explains diversified bonds outperformed treasuries in the recent period mainly because corporate and high‑yield credit spreads were higher and then tightened, boosting returns for those bonds. In early boom phases, with low inflation and tightening spreads, both corporate bonds and treasuries can do well — but movements in credit spreads drive relative performance.
Historically, yes — treasuries tend to perform better in crises. The article notes that in major crises (for example 2008, 1974), credit spreads blow out for corporate and high‑yield bonds while Treasury yields often collapse, making treasuries comparatively safer during severe downturns.
A balanced fund usually outperforms bond funds long term because stocks provide real growth and an inflation hedge, neither of which bonds reliably offer. The article argues bonds have no inflation hedge, limited prospects for real growth and no special tax advantages, so a diversified balanced portfolio should deliver higher long‑term returns despite bond strength in some shorter periods.
For pensions already running, the minimum withdrawal is calculated from the pension account balance at July 1 each year. If you start a pension part‑way through the financial year you must make a pro‑rated payment using a day‑count method. For example, if 180 days remain the formula is: Pension Purchase Price × (180/365 × 4%). Note there is a 25% reduction in the required minimum payment for the current financial year, so people under age 65 have a 3% minimum for this year.
Yes — if life insurance premiums are funded with pre‑tax (concessional) contributions they count toward the concessional contributions cap. The article suggests alternatives such as funding premiums from existing super balances or using after‑tax contributions. Another practical approach is to use the full $25,000 concessional cap for a salary‑sacrificed contribution and then pay insurance from the fund, or consider reducing or removing cover if it’s no longer required.
For a one‑year horizon, the article recommends a 12‑month term deposit at 4.6% if the institution is secure, over a savings account earning 3.25%. A cash‑management trust can be considered for liquidity, but with interest rates trending down the 4.6% term deposit looks hard to beat for a 12‑month investment, provided you’re comfortable locking the money away for that period.
Call 1300 880 160
Start a chat
Schedule a call
