Why the GOP race could be for naught

With the popularity of US presidents tied to the health of the US economy, a continued pick-up in jobs growth could put Obama in a very strong position at the next election.


Republican presidential candidates have devoted months, if not years, of their lives to chasing their party’s nomination, they’ve raised and spent (along with their super PAC allies) tens of millions of dollars, and they’ve participated in more than a dozen debates – each of which has attracted a massive television audience.

But a startling new poll underscores what has got to be a maddening possibility for Republicans: It could all be for naught – and there may be nothing they can do about it. The NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey points to a measurable uptick in optimism about the country’s economic direction, and in the public’s assessment of President Obama’s performance.

By a 37 to 17 per cent margin, respondents said they expect the economy to improve in the next year; back in October, they thought it would get worse by a 32-21 margin. And the number of Americans who believe the country is heading in the right direction now stands at 30 per cent – hardly a huge number, but a clear jump from the 17 per cent who said so in the fall. Overall, Obama’s approval rating is at 48 per cent, the highest it’s been in an NBC/WSJ poll since June, when he was still basking in the afterglow of Osama bin Laden’s demise.

The numbers are a reminder that a president’s re-election fate is ultimately more dependent on the state of the economy than on what strategy the opposition party employs and which candidate it nominates. If economic anxiety and pessimism are rampant, then winning a second term is a profoundly uphill slog, even if the opposition fields a supposedly weak nominee. But if the public widely believes that conditions are healthy or at least improving, then credit – deserved or undeserved – invariably goes to the White House occupant.

More than anything else, this is why Obama, for all of his (perfectly valid) reminders that the economy he inherited was in free fall and that the 2008 meltdown had occurred on his Republican predecessor’s watch, enjoyed such a brief polling honeymoon at the start of his presidency and why he’s been saddled with mostly meager numbers since then. The overriding tendency of swing voters is to find reasons to express displeasure with the president when times are tough, and to look the other way when they’re not.

But the past few months have brought some of the most encouraging economic news of the Obama presidency. The most recent jobs report, released at the start of this month, pegged the unemployment rate at 8.5 per cent, the lowest it’s been in three years and showed the economy adding 200,000 jobs in December. As Salon’s Andrew Leonard put it when the report came out:

And make no mistake, the new numbers do signify an economic recovery. Overall economic growth in the fourth quarter of 2011 is likely to be above three per cent, by far the best quarterly performance in 2011. Excluding the Cash for Clunkers turbo-boost, the US auto industry had its best two months since the crash in November and December. The manufacturing sector is surprisingly healthy. Compared to Europe, the US economy is in an enviable situation.

With good economic news in the headlines, it’s hardly surprising that we’re now seeing real signs of public optimism, with a corresponding improvement in Obama’s own political standing.

To be sure, the NBC/WSJ numbers are tenuous; the progress that Obama has made these past few months can easily be erased in the next few if the recovery falters or regresses. The example of the last one-term president, George H.W. Bush, looms large here. He actually seemed in decent shape to win re-election in the early months of 1992, but in the middle months of the year, the bottom seemed to fall out of the economy, at which point he fell behind Bill Clinton in polling and never regained the lead the rest of the way.

But it can work the other way too. You’d never know it from the hagiography that has set in, but at the halfway mark of his first term, Ronald Reagan was largely seen as a failed president. This was the result of a nasty recession that took hold about eight months into his presidency and that ultimately pushed the jobless rate to over 10 per cent. His party suffered a drubbing in the 1982 midterms, his approval fell to the 30s, and polls showed his most likely Democratic opponents running well ahead of him.

But by the time of the 1984 Democratic race, which turned into a months-long battle between Walter Mondale and Gary Hart, wrapped up, the economy was growing at a rapid rate, with unemployment falling, public confidence swelling, and Reagan’s approval rating surging. It rendered the Democratic race practically meaningless; Americans wanted to re-elect Reagan, and they did by an 18-point margin.

Obama is obviously not on course for that kind of landslide. The scale of this recovery is not nearly as dramatic as that of the mid-’80s. But if it endures, so will Obama’s polling comeback. And if that happens, there won’t be nearly as many sympathetic ears this fall for the Republican argument against him.

This article first appeared on Salon.com. Republished with permission.

Want access to our latest research and new buy ideas?

Start a free 15 day trial and gain access to our research, recommendations and market-beating model portfolios.

Sign up for free

Related Articles