InvestSMART

Whitehaven joins ASIC to fight hoax

WHITEHAVEN Coal has joined Australia's corporate watchdog in investigating the potential for legal recourse against the man whose hoax temporarily wiped more than $314 million off the value of the company.
By · 8 Jan 2013
By ·
8 Jan 2013
comments Comments
WHITEHAVEN Coal has joined Australia's corporate watchdog in investigating the potential for legal recourse against the man whose hoax temporarily wiped more than $314 million off the value of the company.

The hoax, by anti-coal campaigner Jonathan Moylan, tricked investors into thinking that a recent $1.2 billion loan arranged by ANZ for Whitehaven had been cancelled on ethical grounds.

The incident is the third time in six months that trading on the Australian Securities Exchange has been influenced by a hoax, and leading corporate lawyer Simon Rear said it was time that a strong disincentive was provided to other hoaxsters.

"There probably needs to be some more examples made of people and I think that's probably what ASIC will try to do," he said.

"Legislation is only as strong as it can be enforced, and it is always enforced after the fact."

Retail giant David Jones was drawn into a takeover hoax in July, while contractor Macmahon Holdings was also the subject of a hoax in October.

Mr Moylan's hoax was presented as a press release from ANZ and was reinforced by Mr Moylan taking media phone calls while pretending to be a member of the bank's communications staff.

Shares in Whitehaven, which counts struggling coal baron Nathan Tinkler as its biggest shareholder, fell from $3.52 to $3.21 in rapid time before the stock was put into a trading halt.

By mid-afternoon the share price had recovered and the stock closed only 2¢ lower at $3.50.

But those investors who sold their shares at the lower prices appear to have lost their money, with the ASX confirming the trades would not be cancelled.

Whitehaven managing director Tony Haggarty said the company would look at all options to protect its shareholders. "Whitehaven will liaise with the ASX and ASIC in relation to Mr Moylan's irresponsible and ill-conceived conduct and trusts those authorities to take the appropriate action," said Mr Haggarty.

"Whitehaven is also investigating any legal action that maybe available to it and its shareholders. Whitehaven treats matters such as the fraudulent hoax announcement by Mr Moylan very seriously.

"The integrity of the information provided to the public regarding Whitehaven goes to the heart of the market's integrity and directly effects the price of Whitehaven shares, as well as our many shareholders."

Mr Tinkler declined to comment.

ASIC said its initial enquiries would focus on section 1041E of the corporations act which refers to false or misleading statements.

"If there appears to be a breach, ASIC will investigate and take timely and appropriate action," said an ASIC spokesman.

"Market integrity is fundamental to what we do and if we detect any potential breaches of the law or Market Integrity rules we will take timely and appropriate action."

Mr Rear said criminal liability can prevail under section 1041E, while civil liability was covered by a similar clause of the corporations act: provision 1041H.

ANZ, whose corporate logo was involved in the hoax, said it would co-operate with ASIC's investigations, but Mr Rear said the bank may have avenues of recourse under intellectual property laws.

"As a big four bank their reputation is paramount, so they may look to go after this person as well, but there is really only civil damages and loss that they can go after," he said.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The hoax, created by anti-coal campaigner Jonathan Moylan, used a fake ANZ-style press release claiming a $1.2 billion ANZ loan for Whitehaven had been cancelled on ethical grounds. The false announcement temporarily wiped more than $314 million off Whitehaven's market value as the share price fell from $3.52 to $3.21 before a trading halt; the stock later recovered to close $3.50 (2¢ lower).

Jonathan Moylan presented the hoax as an ANZ press release and reinforced it by taking media phone calls while pretending to be a member of ANZ's communications staff. The ANZ corporate logo was used in the fake material, helping make the announcement appear authentic.

ASIC launched initial enquiries focusing on section 1041E of the Corporations Act (false or misleading statements) and said it would investigate and take timely, appropriate action if breaches are detected. The ASX confirmed that the trades executed during the incident would not be cancelled.

According to the ASX statement in the article, the trades from that period would not be cancelled, which means investors who sold at the lower prices appear to have incurred the losses. Whitehaven said it would liaise with the ASX and ASIC and is investigating legal options to protect shareholders.

The article notes corporate lawyer Simon Rear saying criminal liability can apply under section 1041E of the Corporations Act (false or misleading statements) and civil liability under provision 1041H. ASIC said it will investigate potential breaches and take appropriate action; Whitehaven is also exploring legal action and ANZ may consider intellectual property or other civil avenues.

Whitehaven managing director Tony Haggarty said the company would liaise with the ASX and ASIC regarding the 'irresponsible and ill‑conceived' conduct, that it treats the matter very seriously, and that it is investigating any legal action available to protect the company and its shareholders.

Yes. The article says this incident was the third time in six months that ASX trading had been influenced by a hoax. Earlier examples included a takeover hoax involving retail giant David Jones in July and a hoax affecting contractor Macmahon Holdings in October.

The article highlights concerns about market integrity: corporate lawyers and regulators say stronger deterrents and enforcement may be needed because hoaxes can quickly move share prices. ASIC reiterated market integrity is fundamental and that it will investigate potential breaches; investors should note that misleading announcements can affect prices and that regulators and affected companies may pursue legal remedies.