Weather costs high but crops also thrive
The hit to the Queensland economy from the floods alone will be about $2.5 billion, according to the state's Recovery Minister, David Crisafulli.
That storm and last week's floods also set NSW back at least $84 million, while bushfires - stoked by the nation's hottest summer on record - left agriculture damage of another $52 million, the state government said on Friday.
Insured losses across Australia this summer, including for fires in Victoria during December, total $942 million, with claims still coming in, the Insurance Council of Australia said.
Still, farmers in other regions prospered from the summer's vagaries.
"We've had a bumper crop," said orange grower Beverley Fisher, from the Tranquil Hills farm near Cobram on the Victorian side of the Murray River. "The flooding in Queensland has knocked out some of the crops", helping to support prices, she said.
Good prices were crucial because weeks of scorching heat forced Mrs Fisher and her husband to spend thousands of dollars pumping extra water to keep trees watered as the mercury climbed to 45 degrees.
Days of "stinking hot" 48-degree weather also threatened the cotton crop at Darling Farms near Bourke in western NSW, farmer Ian Cole said. Ample supplies of irrigated water meant growing conditions were otherwise ideal, he said.
Even better, floods reaching Bourke and the Darling River from heavy rains three weeks ago in Queensland are filling the region's dams after a long dry spell. "We're going to have another good year no matter what happens," Mr Cole said.
Rice farmers are also banking on a bumper crop. "Our rice loves hot weather," said Ruth Wade, executive director of the Rice Growers Association.
The 1.1 million tonnes of rice expected will be the best since 2005 - when water buybacks are taken into account - and help make up for "10 horrible, dreadful years", she said.
While much of the country endured exceptionally hot and dry conditions - Victoria had its driest summer in 28 years - the availability of water for irrigation from two relatively wet prior years means consumers aren't likely to see a spike in food prices.
Michael McMahon, a southern Queensland citrus grower, said the late-January floodwaters in the Burnett catchment west of Bundaberg rose so swiftly that nearby farmers didn't even have time to move their tractors.
"It was like a tidal wave, almost, coming down the creeks," said Mr McMahon, who heads up the family's farm, Abbotsleigh Citrus.
The river inundated about 50,000 of Mr McMahon's 63,000 lemon, orange and other fruit trees. He should be able to rescue much of the crop from remaining fruit trees - once conditions are dry enough for the pickers. "We've still got plenty to sell," he said.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The article reports major impacts: the floods from ex‑cyclone Oswald are estimated to have hit the Queensland economy by about $2.5 billion (Recovery Minister David Crisafulli). New South Wales was set back at least $84 million, and separate bushfires caused about $52 million in agricultural damage in that state.
According to the Insurance Council of Australia cited in the article, insured losses across Australia this summer — including December fires in Victoria — totalled about $942 million, with claims still coming in.
The effects were mixed. Some growers reported bumper crops (for example, an orange grower at Tranquil Hills), and rice farmers expect about 1.1 million tonnes — the best since 2005 when water buybacks are taken into account. At the same time, flooding in parts of Queensland knocked out some crops and intense heat increased risks for cotton and other crops.
The article suggests consumers are unlikely to see a sharp spike in food prices because irrigation water availability remains strong after two relatively wet prior years, which helps maintain supplies despite regional damage and weather disruption.
Farmers faced higher costs during extreme heat — one orange grower said they spent thousands of dollars pumping extra water to keep trees alive as temperatures climbed to around 45°C. Floods also caused damage that can lead to recovery costs, though some crops may be salvaged once conditions dry.
Rice growers expect about 1.1 million tonnes this season, which the article notes would be the best crop since 2005 (adjusting for water buybacks). A strong rice harvest helps stabilise supply and can offset price pressure from other weather‑hit regions, supporting food availability after a long period of poor seasons.
In some areas the floods refilled dams and river systems after long dry spells (for example, floods reaching Bourke and the Darling River), improving irrigation prospects. Farmers in those regions said the replenished water supplies mean they expect another good year despite hot conditions.
Based on the article, investors should follow insured loss totals (the Insurance Council's numbers), official regional economic impact reports (such as the $2.5 billion Queensland estimate), crop production updates (like the rice 1.1 million tonne estimate) and water/irrigation reports, since water availability and extreme weather are key drivers of crop yields and insurance claims.

