InvestSMART

Watchdog growls over Lion deals

REGULATORS are casting their net wide as they investigate sensational insider trading accusations focused on Lion Nathan shares.
By · 1 May 2010
By ·
1 May 2010
comments Comments
REGULATORS are casting their net wide as they investigate sensational insider trading accusations focused on Lion Nathan shares.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has sought information from two investment banks, Deutsche and Caliburn, in insider trading investigations covering two separate transactions involving Lion Nathan. In a further development, BusinessDay has established that ASIC has questioned Lion Nathan staff.

BusinessDay also believes other firms with access to privileged information about the transactions are being questioned. Six accounting, law and public relations firms that provided services to companies during the two deals say they have not been approached by ASIC.

In contrast, public relations consultancy FD Third Person would provide no comment on the issue. Nor would six investment banks named as being involved in the deals: Caliburn, Citigroup, Deutsche, JPMorgan, Macquarie Group and UBS.

BusinessDay has established that both Deutsche and Caliburn have received ASIC "notices to produce" in relation to insider trading investigations that covered Lion Nathan transactions. BusinessDay is making no allegations about firms that may have been contacted by ASIC in the course of what is believed to be a wide-ranging inquiry.

ASIC is examining unusual trading patterns in Lion Nathan shares in two periods before its $3.5 billion takeover by Japanese food and drink company Kirin Holdings last year.

In that transaction, Deutsche and JPMorgan acted as advisers to Kirin, Caliburn acted as adviser to Lion Nathan, and FD Third Person acted as public relations adviser to Kirin.

The investigation, which also involves Australian Federal Police, is into allegations that a Deutsche employee passed information about the deal to a second person who then informed a West Australian crime figure.

The tip was then allegedly passed to young people who used CommSec accounts to profit before the eventually successful takeover offer of $12.22 a share was launched on April 24 last year. Before the announcement, the shares had last traded at $7.96.

Australian Federal Police have confirmed they participated in raids in Sydney and Perth.

BusinessDay put questions to all identifiable Australian professional services firms involved in two separate Lion Nathan transactions last year: the failed merger between Coca-Cola Amatil and Lion Nathan, and the successful takeover by Kirin.

BusinessDay asked three questions, including: "Has your firm been served with a notice to produce by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission within the last year in relation to trading in Lion Nathan shares?" The six investment banks chose to make no comment.

Six of the seven firms that had a part in the deal accountants Deloitte and Ernst & Young, law firms Mallesons Stephen Jaques and Blake Dawson, and PR firms Kreab Gavin Anderson and Cosway Australia said they were unaware of any contact by ASIC in relation to trading in Lion Nathan shares. FD Third Person would not comment

A spokesman for Lion Nathan would not comment. A spokeswoman for Coca-Cola Amatil said it had not been contacted by ASIC about Lion Nathan transactions.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

ASIC is investigating unusual trading patterns in Lion Nathan shares around two periods before the $3.5 billion takeover by Kirin Holdings. The wide-ranging inquiry, which also involves the Australian Federal Police, focuses on alleged trading ahead of the takeover announcement and whether privileged deal information was passed to others.

BusinessDay reports that Deutsche and Caliburn have received ASIC "notices to produce" in relation to the investigations. ASIC has also questioned Lion Nathan staff, and other firms with access to privileged information are believed to be under scrutiny. Several named investment banks (Caliburn, Citigroup, Deutsche, JPMorgan, Macquarie Group and UBS) declined to comment, while six professional services firms say they were not approached.

According to the article, Deutsche and JPMorgan acted as advisers to Kirin in the successful takeover, while Caliburn acted as adviser to Lion Nathan. Public relations firm FD Third Person acted as PR adviser to Kirin.

Yes. The Australian Federal Police confirmed they participated in raids in Sydney and Perth as part of the investigation into the alleged insider trading related to Lion Nathan transactions.

BusinessDay reports allegations that a Deutsche employee passed information about the deal to a second person, who then informed a West Australian crime figure. The tip was allegedly passed to young people who used CommSec accounts to buy shares and profit before the takeover offer of $12.22 a share was launched on April 24. Before the announcement, the shares had last traded at $7.96. These are alleged actions under investigation.

Six firms that were involved in the deals—accountants Deloitte and Ernst & Young, law firms Mallesons Stephen Jaques and Blake Dawson, and PR firms Kreab Gavin Anderson and Cosway Australia—said they were unaware of any contact by ASIC about trading in Lion Nathan shares.

BusinessDay states it is making no allegations about firms that may have been contacted by ASIC in the course of what it describes as a wide-ranging inquiry. The article reports on information and questionings established during reporting.

The article shows regulators can cast a wide net when unusual trading patterns surface around major corporate events. ASIC and the AFP can issue notices to produce, question staff, and conduct raids. For investors, this highlights that unexpected pre-deal trading can trigger formal probes and that official announcements and regulatory updates can affect market confidence and share prices.