US shale glut changes coal export game
The glut of US gas is threatening to choke off further expansion of the local gas export sector, beyond what is already under construction.
Cheap gas in the US is forcing more US coal into export markets - in Europe and Asia - which has cut across export growth prospects for much of the local coal industry, Mr King told a conference in Sydney on Friday.
Developers of export gas projects in Queensland, for example, were already beneficiaries of the changes unfolding, with an increase in labour availability as coalminers retrench staff and contractors.
The shale revolution has catapulted the US to a cheap manufacturing centre, with "implications for Europe", which is increasingly uncompetitive especially with high energy prices.
In the Australian coal industry, several planned expansion projects and proposed new mines are now not expected to proceed.
The withdrawal of capital from the coal projects has resulted in "much more labour available" for the export gas projects being developed in Queensland.
Mr King said Europe was "struggling with the high level of subsidies required" to sustain its renewables energy sector, in areas such as wind and solar energy. "Spain is largely bankrupt due to subsidies" on renewable energy. "Europe's economic circumstances are increasingly uncompetitive. Subsidies will be withdrawn," he said, arguing that the "global consensus" in favour of a price on carbon no longer existed.
Despite criticism over the high cost of developing export gas projects in Australia, Mr King said the projects now being planned in the US would be only slightly less expensive, although the US did have the advantage of using existing infrastructure, which needs to be reconfigured from, for example, import to export terminals.
With the US benefiting from falling energy prices, electricity prices in Australia will rise further unless renewables energy schemes are revised, Mr King said.
The high cost of the household solar subsidy in Australia, which the Queensland Competition Authority estimated at $200 a household a year will "need to be reversed ... inevitably".
US coal export capacity could more than double to about 400 million tonnes by the end of the decade, with most of that growth aimed at the Asian market.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
Grant King warned the US shale oil and gas revolution — and the resulting glut of cheap US gas — will increase pressure on Australian coal exporters because cheap US gas is forcing more US coal into export markets in Europe and Asia, cutting into growth prospects for the local coal industry.
The article says cheap US gas is prompting more US coal to be shipped to Europe and Asia, which reduces demand growth for coal from other exporters such as Australia and is reshaping global coal export dynamics.
Developers of Queensland export gas projects are benefiting because retrenchment in the coal sector has freed up labour and contractors, increasing labour availability for those gas projects.
According to the article, several planned expansion projects and proposed new mines in Australia are now not expected to proceed, as capital has been withdrawn from coal projects amid the market changes.
The article reports US coal export capacity could more than double to about 400 million tonnes by the end of the decade, with most of that growth aimed at the Asian market.
Grant King said that with the US benefiting from falling energy prices, Australian electricity prices will rise further unless renewable energy schemes are revised. He also noted the high cost of household solar subsidies in Queensland (estimated at about $200 per household per year) will likely need to be reversed.
King said Europe is increasingly uncompetitive because it struggles with the high level of subsidies required to sustain wind and solar, citing Spain as largely bankrupt due to subsidies. He argued subsidies will be withdrawn and that the previous global consensus in favour of a price on carbon no longer exists.
The article states Mr King believes projects planned in the US would be only slightly less expensive than Australian export gas projects, but the US has the advantage of existing infrastructure that can be reconfigured from import to export terminals.

