InvestSMART

Time to inject new life into the corporate bond market

We are hugely exposed to the highest-risk investments available, but it doesn't have to be that way, writes Ian Verrender.
By · 10 Dec 2011
By ·
10 Dec 2011
comments Comments
We are hugely exposed to the highest-risk investments available, but it doesn't have to be that way, writes Ian Verrender.

PENSION funds in almost every other country look to invest in a much higher proportion of safer investments, particularly in fixed-interest securities. And that is where the argument becomes interesting.

On top of investing in the local sharemarket, our superannuation funds each year send tens of billions of dollars offshore into wholesale debt markets, to capture some low-risk returns.

And guess where our very own banks go to borrow trillions of dollars? That's right, those same overseas debt markets. They then lend that money to Australian consumers and companies, creating a foreign debt problem.

Does that make sense? In essence, our retirement money is being sent overseas, borrowed by our banks, and then repatriated and lent here. Fees are raked off at every opportunity and currency hedging, or insurance costs, add to the financial burden.

You have to wonder. Why not just cut out the middleman and have a mechanism in which Australian superannuation savings can be lent to Australians? It may be a little cumbersome with consumers. But when it comes to our companies, surely it couldn't be too difficult.

One of the great difficulties is that we no longer have a corporate bond market. If companies want to borrow money, they either have to go to a bank or head offshore to a foreign debt market where they just may be borrowing Australian funds.

With all the hoo-ha about debt and debt crises in recent times, there are a few fundamental principles that most people forget. The first is that debt is safer than equity. When a company goes under, creditors stand before shareholders. And that's why debt pays a fixed return. It is far more secure. And the risk is lower.

If you get your head around that, you'll understand the madness at the heart of the Australian superannuation industry. We are all hugely exposed to the highest-risk investments with which you could possibly be associated.

So how do we change it? With great difficulty is the obvious answer. But next week, some of our brightest minds will gather together to try to nut out a solution.

Led by David Livingstone and Mark Burrows, investment bank Credit Suisse on Tuesday will host a seminar aimed at shifting the behaviour of our superannuation guardians that, if successful, could rank as one of the greatest revolutions in our national savings plan. Given the uncertainty on global markets, the timing couldn't be better.

Treasurer Wayne Swan and a coterie of Treasury officials were quick to sign up. They want to see the evolution of a corporate debt market, where Australian companies can raise funds directly from Australians, where savings are invested directly into the debt of local companies.

There is no logical reason why it shouldn't happen. In the 1980s, Australian corporations could raise cash from local lenders by issuing corporate bonds. For some reason, in the intervening decades, the market has all but dried up. Maybe it was the growth of our banks, or the liberalisation of global credit markets.

Reviving the market here again is more difficult than it seems. While there is almost universal agreement in principle, convincing the participants the companies, the banks, the superannuation funds to alter their behaviour is far from simple.

Government regulation would be one option, but it would be far from ideal. A better solution, perhaps, is whether the newly defined superannuation default funds, where the bulk of Australians have their cash parked, should include a benchmark portfolio.

In this way, a certain percentage of funds could be allocated to a local corporate bond market. That could be enough to resuscitate this once-active market.

Given the massive infrastructure requirements of our rundown cities and regional centres, a benchmark portfolio for default super funds could make billions of dollars available for infrastructure investment. That would be a low-risk, long-term investment ideal for those approaching retirement.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The article explains that the Australian corporate bond market has largely dried up since the 1980s. That matters because companies now either borrow from banks or head offshore to foreign debt markets, which reduces local lending options for Australian savers and forces more reliance on higher‑risk or offshore solutions.

According to the article, superannuation funds send tens of billions offshore each year to capture low‑risk returns in wholesale debt markets. With a muted local corporate bond market, funds look overseas for fixed‑interest securities rather than investing directly in domestic corporate debt.

The article points out that retirement savings are often sent overseas, where banks borrow them and then repatriate the money to lend to Australians. This can add multiple layers of fees and currency‑hedging or insurance costs, increasing the overall financial burden on investors.

Yes — the article reminds readers that debt is generally safer than equity. Creditors are paid before shareholders if a company fails, and debt typically delivers a fixed return, which means lower risk compared with owning shares.

The article describes a Credit Suisse seminar led by David Livingstone and Mark Burrows, attended by Treasurer Wayne Swan and Treasury officials, to explore solutions. One suggested idea is setting a benchmark portfolio for default superannuation funds that includes a percentage allocated to a local corporate bond market to stimulate demand.

A benchmark allocation to local corporate bonds could channel a steady stream of superannuation savings into domestic corporate debt, potentially resuscitating the market. That would create low‑risk, long‑term investment opportunities — useful for those approaching retirement — and could free up funds for national infrastructure projects.

The article highlights that reviving the market is difficult because it requires companies, banks and superannuation funds to change established behaviours. While government regulation is an option, the piece notes it may not be ideal and persuading all participants to adopt new practices is complex.

Yes. The article argues that channeling superannuation savings into a domestic corporate bond market could make billions available for infrastructure in cities and regional centres, offering low‑risk, long‑term funding that suits retirees and national needs alike.