THE ORGANISATION that gives a green tick to some of Australia's biggest timber and paper companies has voluntarily suspended most of its operations after a bruising stoush with environment groups over its approval of paper brand Reflex.
SmartWood, a division of Rainforest Alliance, gave up its ability to give out chain of custody certifications following an investigation into its audit of Reflex maker Australian Paper by international governing body the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC).
In addition to Australian Paper, Smartwood certified Tasmanian forestry group Gunns, plantation owners Hancock, tissue company Kimberly Clark and Norwegian paper group Norske Skog, which supplies most newsprint used in Australia.
The voluntary suspension was accepted by Accreditation Services International (ASI), which was auditing SmartWood on behalf of the FSC, on September 1, and remains in force until lifted by ASI.
"This is the first time in the development of FSC Australia that this has occurred," local FSC head Michael Spencer said.
He said the suspension showed the FSC system worked. "Integrity is really paramount to the system," he said. "Businesses particularly need to know the rules are applied consistently."
If SmartWood is not reinstated then once certificates held by the Australian companies it audited expire, those clients will have to find a new auditor to remain in the FSC program.
ASI's investigation of SmartWood was triggered by environment groups unhappy it had continued to certify Australian Paper's use of timber logged from native forests by the Victorian government's logging company, VicForests. Green groups say all native forests in Australia are classified "high conservation value" and cannot be logged for use in FSC-certified products.
Australian Paper withdrew from the FSC system last month so it could continue to use VicForests logs, approved by rival accreditation system the Australian Forestry Standard.
My Environment director Sarah Rees, whose complaint helped spark ASI's probe, said the result showed that the FSC "is capable of responding to environmental and community change".
"This is a fair and transparent audit and has put FSC leagues ahead of other timber standards in Australia."
Wilderness Society forest campaigner Luke Chamberlain said "by hitching their wagon to the unsustainable practices of VicForests and Australian Paper, Rainforest Alliance have taken themselves out in what is an international blight on forestry practices in Australia".
SmartWood spokeswoman Anita Neville said the organisation would invest in auditor training and reviewing its performance against Australian FSC standards with a view to "getting back to work in this area as soon as possible in 2012".
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What happened to SmartWood and why was SmartWood's operation suspended?
SmartWood, a division of Rainforest Alliance that issues FSC chain of custody certifications, voluntarily suspended most of its operations after Accreditation Services International (ASI) launched an audit following complaints from environmental groups about SmartWood's approval of paper brand Reflex made by Australian Paper.
Which companies certified by SmartWood could be affected by the suspension?
The article says SmartWood had certified Australian Paper, Tasmanian forestry group Gunns, plantation owners Hancock, tissue maker Kimberly-Clark and Norwegian paper group Norske Skog, so those companies could be affected while the suspension remains in place.
When did ASI accept SmartWood's suspension and how long will it last?
Accreditation Services International accepted SmartWood's voluntary suspension on September 1. The suspension remains in force until ASI lifts it.
What triggered ASI's investigation into SmartWood's audits?
ASI's probe was triggered by environmental groups unhappy that SmartWood continued to certify Australian Paper's use of timber logged from native forests by VicForests. Green groups argue those native forests should be classified as high conservation value and not used in FSC-certified products.
What are the implications for companies' FSC certificates if SmartWood is not reinstated?
If SmartWood is not reinstated, once the certificates issued by SmartWood expire those clients will need to find a new auditor to remain in the FSC program, otherwise they would no longer be FSC-certified under that system.
Did any company change its certification approach in response to the controversy?
Yes. According to the article, Australian Paper withdrew from the FSC system so it could continue to use VicForests logs approved by a rival accreditation system, the Australian Forestry Standard.
How have environmental groups and FSC representatives reacted to the suspension?
FSC Australia's head said the suspension shows the FSC system works and that integrity and consistent rule application matter. My Environment welcomed the outcome as evidence that FSC can respond to environmental and community change, while the Wilderness Society criticized Rainforest Alliance for aligning with what it called unsustainable practices.
What steps has SmartWood said it will take to resolve the issue and return to work?
SmartWood said it will invest in auditor training and review its performance against Australian FSC standards, with a stated aim of getting back to work in this area as soon as possible in 2012.
Call 1300 880 160
Start a chat
Schedule a call
