InvestSMART

The new game in town

Outsourcing is becoming a game that more than the big guys can play, writes Sue White.
By · 21 Sep 2013
By ·
21 Sep 2013
comments Comments
Outsourcing is becoming a game that more than the big guys can play, writes Sue White.

When a US worker made international headlines earlier this year for outsourcing his job at telco Verizon to a worker in China, it seemed "Bob" had simply figured out what large companies have spent the past couple of decades doing. Sometimes there are cheaper, more efficient ways of getting a task done than sitting there and doing it yourself.

But while Bob, somewhat unsurprisingly, was fired (to the disappointment of many following his story), the fact he could even achieve the task shows just how much our ability to outsource work has changed.

"The first wave of outsourcing was all about voice - for example, call centres. We saw that work going overseas," says outsourcing specialist and former president of the Australian Business Process Outsourcing Organisation, Martin Conboy.

It's known in the industry as lift and shift. "We lift it from here and shift it to there. It's more commonly known as labour arbitrage," he says.

But outsourcing has moved way beyond the lift and shift. Customers now demand 24/7 service, and both technology and outsourcing make it possible. For those companies not willing to engage with the world of 24-hour business, social media does the convincing. spreading the word about problems faster than you can say "global economy".

"Expectations are rising," Conboy says.

According to the University of NSW's Professor Michael Quinlan, the trend to an increasingly outsourced workplace is concerning.

"You could never run an argument that nothing should be outsourced . . . But what usually drives most outsourcing experiences is cost- cutting . . . You have to ask how that price reduction is achieved; it's usually by a cut in quality or a cut in the labour standards for the work," he says. Quinlan says the "chains of subcontractors" seen in some industries often result in exploitative conditions, or at a minimum, difficulty in enforcing conditions such as occupational health and safety requirements.

"The more contracts you involve, the harder it is to regulate," he says.

Of course as the way we work is changing some people are more than happy to be "outsourced".

Contrary to popular opinion, our employers are not only outsourcing overseas. In Australia, an online platform connecting local "on demand" workers with businesses has tapped into a niche that appears to be keeping both sides happy. Now running in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane, Sidekicker began when a time-poor Melburnian, Tom Amos, was studying for his chartered accountant certificate and dreamt of outsourcing his chores. His future business partner, Jacqui Bull, could see the potential.

"I would have loved a way to make work fit in around my studies and sporting commitments," Bull says.

The pair soon realised the real opportunity lay not in dropping off dry-cleaning for busy professionals (although there is some of that), but helping small to medium businesses deal with a temporary spike in workload.

"People need short-term help with data entry, accounts or manning a registration desk at an event," Bull says.

More than 5500 hours of work has been assigned to the pre-screened "Sidekicks" since the business launched in September 2012. An employer posts a job, and pre-screened candidates apply. By balancing the number of available Sidekicks with the rough amount of work out there, employers don't get overloaded with applicants for a short-term gig, and Sidekicks aren't competing with hundreds of others or "bidding" for jobs, like say, Elance. Jobs start at $29 an hour (the company takes about $9 of that) and employers are free to offer more.

While Bull says Sidekicker takes its role in screening candidates seriously, once a Sidekick is approved, it's hands-off in terms of the actual workplace relationship.

"We're not a recruitment agency . . . we have no control over what jobs they do, it's just an initial measure . . . [But] we want quality people. People have to apply with a resume and cover letter, and we interview them," she says.

Bull says Sidekicker is not about driving prices down.

"We don't want the race to the bottom. It's about providing access to a pool of great people," she says.

The company tries to keeps the deal sweet for Sidekicks through a mix of community building, private rating systems and practical sweeteners. The technology allows workers to communicate with each other and the ratings system, although not public, means if either side acts up they can be removed from the site.

Sidekicker can also handle all the payments and invoices are generated automatically after job is completed.

Bull says outsourcing in this way will never replace full-time employees. But she believes it may change the game.

"Many people don't want to be stuck in the 9 to 5. They want to work for a period, then do something else with the rest of their time," she says.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Outsourcing has moved beyond simple 'lift and shift' of jobs like call centres to overseas labour. Technology and customer expectations for 24/7 service mean companies now outsource more complex tasks and use on‑demand platforms to fill temporary needs. This trend can create new business models and revenue opportunities for specialist platforms, but also changes cost and risk profiles for companies.

Lift and shift, often called labour arbitrage, is the practice of moving work from a higher‑cost location to a lower‑cost one — for example, call centre roles moved overseas. It’s a cost‑driven approach that was common in the first wave of outsourcing and is still a key concept when evaluating how companies cut operating costs.

Key risks include potential drops in quality or labour standards when cost‑cutting drives outsourcing; complex chains of subcontractors that can make regulation and enforcement difficult; and reputational risk amplified by social media. Academic commentary in the article warns that these factors can lead to exploitative conditions and regulatory exposure.

Sidekicker connects local, pre‑screened 'Sidekicks' with businesses needing short‑term help. Employers post a job, candidates apply, and Sidekicker interviews and screens applicants. Jobs start at $29 an hour (the company typically takes about $9 of that), invoices are generated automatically, and private rating systems help manage quality.

No — Sidekicker positions itself as an on‑demand platform rather than a recruitment agency. Once a Sidekick is approved the platform is hands‑off about the workplace relationship. The company says this model won’t replace full‑time jobs but may change the way people work by offering flexible, short‑term gigs.

According to Sidekicker in the article, the platform aims to avoid a race to the bottom by focusing on quality and pre‑screening candidates. Unlike bidding marketplaces where workers undercut each other, Sidekicker balances supply and demand and uses private ratings and community features to keep standards up.

The article notes that since launching in September 2012, Sidekicker has assigned more than 5,500 hours of work and operates in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. These metrics indicate initial market uptake among small and medium businesses needing temporary staff for tasks like data entry, accounts or event registration.

Ask how the company ensures quality and labour standards, how it handles payments and invoicing, what its fee model is (for example the article notes Sidekicker’s $29 starting rate with about $9 taken by the company), how scalable and defensible the platform is, and what regulatory or reputational risks exist from subcontracting or international outsourcing.