InvestSMART

Ten: The billionaires' TV club

Ten Network becomes the plaything of billionaires, Rio Tinto prepares to bulk up, and a counter-bid for Impress Energy?
By · 29 Nov 2010
By ·
29 Nov 2010
comments Comments

PORTFOLIO POINT: There's a good reason why corporate heavyweights are buying into Ten Network: Influence.

Ten Network (TEN). The television network may very well be a turnaround story; it’s also fast becoming a way for Australia’s billionaires to make sure they can be heard. Less than a few weeks after the television network handed over board seats to James Packer and Lachlan Murdoch, Western Australia’s iron ore empress Gina Rinehart will take delivery of her own board seat at Ten after purchasing a 10% stake for $165 million or $1.58 per share.

Several weeks ago it became clear to me that the stakes being purchased in Ten weren’t necessarily a precursor to a full takeover. What is really going on is that Packer and Rinehart are buying influence. Packer’s main interests are casinos and he will want some media muscle if he decides to proceed with taking the remaining casinos off Tabcorp after the demerger.

Rinehart, on the other hand, was blind-sided by the government’s resources rent tax and will be taking out some insurance to make sure that if something like that happens again she will have an avenue to make some serious waves. When you compare the scale of the investments in Ten to the amount of money both have tied up in their primary businesses, of casinos and iron ore respectively, it’s really quite obvious. We are talking about a hundred million versus billions of dollars and Ten is really the only remaining media asset where they can have that kind of influence.

As an aside, I can see a real investment opportunity emerging with radio. In the past AM radio was the poor cousin of FM but with the advent of digital radio technology the sound quality from both will be identical.

Now this is interesting because, depending on the city, FM licences go for about $40–60 million yet AM licences change hands for almost nothing. Pacific Star Network (PNW) for instance, with a market cap of $18.7 million, leases its two Melbourne AM licences for effectively nothing because of the sound degradation associated with AM radio. Once they go digital, however, you won’t be able to tell them apart and this has obvious implications for companies such as Austereo (AEO), which owns a bunch of metro FM licences, and Fairfax (FXJ), which owns a selection of metro AM licences. So, if you’ll pardon the pun, stay tuned on this developing story.

Rio Tinto (RIO). Following the collapse of its WA joint venture with BHP, Rio Tinto says it is on the hunt again for mid-tier iron ore acquisitions, which is good news for shareholders in those companies, although I wouldn’t start celebrating just yet. Rio is Australia’s biggest iron ore producer and the competition regulator is starting to look at everything it does so it might think it’s easier to buy companies in Africa than Australia.

Fortescue Metals Group is too big for Rio to be allowed to take over now but, generally speaking, if there are assets near where the miner already operates they’re the ones it will look at first. So if you get the map out then Mt Gibson Iron is a pretty obvious target

Brockman Resources is also a pretty good one (see Iron ore’s best bets). The $932 million all-scrip bid by Hong Kong limousine company Wah Nam for Brockman Resources put the company in play, and FerrAus has indicated it will consider offers better than the 6 to 1 scrip bid it received from Wah Nam.

Of course there are plenty of ASX listed iron ore companies with African assets so you never really know, especially given the enormous number of mid-tier iron ore companies out there. It could be like finding a needle in a haystack. However, one of my rules is to look at those companies that have received bids before and on that basis you can really narrow the field a bit.

AMP/AXA. Some corners of the press have been reporting that hedge funds are deliberately shorting AMP in order to get a higher portion of the cash part of the bid for AXA Asia-Pacific, but that’s just nonsense. A lot of people – journalists included – don’t understand how hedge funds operate so I’ll tell you what is going on.

AMP is paying 48¢ a share in cash and 0.73 shares for every AXA share. AXA SA is topping up the balance in the $13.3 billion bid if AMP’s shares fall below $5.60, when they are priced over on the volume weighted average price (VWAP) in April.

The funds are simply hedging: they’re going long on AXA and short on AMP. The problem for hedge funds is normally they know the VWAP ratio but this time they don’t, so what they will be doing is trying to match the market VWAP. Some are doing it now because the market may fall and others will do it in April. They’re no more trying to force AMP’s price down than they are hedging their exposure.

The latest misguided rumour doing the rounds is that people are saying that the bid is still subject to AMP doing due diligence. AMP and AXA Asia Pacific have signed the documents to start the takeover of the wealth manager, but people are quick to bring up AMP’s reputation for botching some critical deals and questioning whether it can get this over the line. I believe it will be done. AMP chief executive Craig Dunn knows what he has to do and needs to do the acquisition. I think it’s going ahead and if you buy in at today’s prices then you will probably make 5–6% over six months, which is about double what you will make from a bank account over the same period – if you can handle the risk.

Impress Energy (ITC). There are a couple of aspects of Beach Energy’s bid for Cooper Basin neighbour Impress Energy I wanted to share with you today. The bid on the table from Beach Energy is 8.25¢ a share, valuing the oil and gas minnow at $73.1 million. Impress has been hovering around the 5¢ mark for most of the last year so on paper it looks attractive.

But I was looking through the shareholder register last week and, sure enough, Victoria Petroleum (VPE) also owns 10.2% of Impress and has joint ventures in a couple of assets. It really wouldn’t surprise me if they decided they didn’t want Beach, which now owns 19.9% of the company, to buy any more.

I always look at the strategic shareholdings, and the question here is whether Victoria Petroleum is going to be happy about this bid. My bet is probably not. They might be happy with the current arrangement and quite confident that the business could be worth 20–30¢ in a year’s time, which is presumably what Beach thinks or it wouldn’t be trying to buy them.

The takeover is conditional on 75% shareholder acceptance so Victoria Petroleum’s 10% isn’t enough to block the offer. I’m just saying there’s another strategic shareholder here who has the capacity to do something and these situations are always worth paying attention to.

Tom Elliott, managing director of MM&E Capital, may have interests in any of the stocks mentioned.

-Takeover action, November 22-26, 2010
Date Target
ASX
Bidder
(%)
Notes
25/11/10 Aevum
AVE
Stockland
94.78
25/11/10 Apollo Gas
AZO
Dart Energy
91.73
Bidder's statement despatched; offer closes Dec 2
23/11/10 Argent Minerals
ARD
US Nickel
27.40
11/11/10 Brockman Resources
BRM
Wah Nam International Holdings
21.11
25/10/10 Citadel Resources
CGG
Equinox Minerals
19.90
Recommended takeover announced
22/11/10 Clever Communications Australia
CVA
BigAir Group
0.00
12/11/10 Copper Strike
CSE
Kagara
17.22
Rejected.
25/11/10 Entellect Solutions
ESN
Mooter Media
68.30
11/11/10 FerrAus
FRS
Wah Nam International Holdings
19.90
22/11/10 Indigo Properties Australia
IPA
DK Northern Investments
0.00
25/10/10 Laguna Resources
LRC
Kingsgate Consolidated
11.33
Recommended off-market offer announced
22/10/10 Northern Energy
NEC
New Hope Energy
4.94
Offer rejected.
24/11/10 Padbury Mining
PDY
Fe Ltd
1.35
Bid lapses.
24/11/10 Sphere Minerals
SPH
Xstrata
73.31
Unconditional.
Schemes of Arrangement
29/10/10 Andean Resources
AND
Goldcorp
19.90
Vote Dec 3. Court approves bid.
25/10/10 ASX
ASX
Singapore Exchange
0.00
Parties announce agreement. Vote Mar 2011.
04/11/10 Avoca Resources
AVO
Anatolia Minerals Development
0.00
Vote Jan/Feb 2011; FIRB approval received
18/11/10 AXA Asia Pacific
AXA
AMP
0.00
Vote end Mar.
26/11/10 Choiseul Investments
CHO
Milton Corporation
11.90
Approved.
20/10/10 Dominion Mining
DOM
Kingsgate Consolidated
0.00
22/11/10 Impress Energy
ITC
Beach Energy
19.90
Vote March.
15/11/10 ING Industrial Fund
IIF
Goodman Group consortium
0.00
Due diligence.
18/11/10 Innamincka Petroleum
INP
Drillsearch Energy
0.00
Vote Dec 14.
20/10/10 ITX Group
ITX
Avnet
0.00
Vote Nov 29.
12/11/10 MAC Services Group
MSL
Oil States International
19.90
FIRB approves scheme.
04/11/10 Provet Holdings
PVT
Henry Schein Inc
0.00
Scheme booklet registered; meeting Dec 9
25/11/10 Ross Human Directions
RHD
Peoplebank Holdings
0.00
Adjourned to Dec 16.
06/07/10 Sylvastate
SYL
Whitefield
0.00
Common CEO.
25/11/10 Wridgways Australia
WWA
Santa Fe Holdings
0.00
Approved.
Foreshadowed Offers
03/06/10 BOOM Logistics
BOL
Archer Capital, McAleese Group
10.47
Indicative scheme proposal.
12/11/10 Caledon Resources
CCD
Guangdong Rising Asset Management
0.00
Possible scheme. FIRB-approved.
15/10/10 Indophil Resources
IRN
San Miguel Corporation
10.10
Binding exclusivity period to Jan 10.
23/11/10 ING Real Estate Healthcare Fund
IHF
Northwest Value Partners
0.00
Indicative proposal.
27/10/10 Perpetual
PPT
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co
0.00
Perpetual to meet with KKR
22/10/10 Redflex Holdings
RDF
Unnamed third parties
0.00
Discussions progressing.
15/11/10 Ross Human Directions
RHD
Chandler Macleod Group
0.00
Due diligence.

Source: News Bites

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
Tom Elliott
Tom Elliott
Keep on reading more articles from Tom Elliott. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.