InvestSMART

Surf retailer needs a white knight rescue

IT SEEMS the only solution for Billabong is a white knight trade buyer that can rescue it from the bourse and re-energise its iconic surfwear and streetwear business outside of the public gaze.
By · 26 Jun 2012
By ·
26 Jun 2012
comments Comments
IT SEEMS the only solution for Billabong is a white knight trade buyer that can rescue it from the bourse and re-energise its iconic surfwear and streetwear business outside of the public gaze.

The company, which traded at $17 five years ago, slumped below $1 yesterday as it returned to the ASX after a shock $225 million capital raising.

For its founder, major shareholder and director Gordon Merchant it has been a wild ride as his wealth has tumbled from $630 million five years ago to less than $40 million today.

While all retail stocks have taking a pounding in the past two years Billabong's fall from grace has been worse than most. It is a glaring example of a company whose credibility is so badly damaged and staff morale so low that it seems the best solution is a new owner who can spend the time and expertise to rebuild it.

The situation hasn't been helped by Merchant's absence. Not only didn't he take up his full allocation in the capital raising, despite rejecting a private equity offer at $3.30 back in February, he didn't face his investors to explain why not.

Instead, he is believed to be taking time out at his beach house in Jeffreys Bay, South Africa.

The falling share price comes as at least two industry players and some private equity operators are believed to be considering taking a strategic holding or making a full takeover bid for Billabong.

Speculation is rife that within the next two to four weeks private equity and a trade buyer will emerge. Names being touted include TPG, KKR and Archer, but the list could be far greater given this company still has some strong brands, it has just lost its way.

Trade buyers with an interest are believed to include Nike and French luxury group PPR, which bought Volcom Inc, the Costa Mesa surf-and-skate brand, last year for $US607.5 million. A wealthy family company is also believed to be bunkered down looking closely at retail companies, including Billabong.

It isn't the first time private equity has considered a tilt at Billabong. TPG made an offer at $3.30 a share in February but Merchant used his stake to block TPG's advances. The difference this time around is Merchant won't be in a position of strength to knock an offer back.

This follows a shock announcement by the company last week that it would have to raise $225 million in fresh equity at $1.02 a share.

The falling share price, including a profit downgrade, has enraged investors to the point where a few are contemplating a class action against the company.

Troubles at Billabong can be attributed to an ill-judged strategy, a series of profit downgrades, liquidity and debt fears, a dysfunctional board and now a capital raising.

Not surprisingly, staff moral is dangerously low. It wasn't helped when the board decided to appoint a new chief executive, Launa Inman, last month. At the time of her appointment there was scepticism in the investment community that she did not have the right skill set to fix the company's mess.

An increasing number of staff are now questioning her appointment as she comes to grips with the different brands, including ascribing the right name to the right brand.

Sources close to the company said Gordon has gone away to his beach home for three weeks to digest the realisation that a deal is inevitable. He is believed to have not been present at last week's board meeting for the capital raising decision. His absence, along with a string of other factors, has left staff gutted.

One source said Gordon's wealth was tied up in Billabong and despite the decimation of his wealth he was reluctant to sell out. It is believed that if a private equity operator or trade buyer offered him a role and a stake in any takeover, he would back it.

It comes as a number of shareholders, including Billabong's second largest shareholder Perennial Value, has suggested he resign from the board.

The key topic among staff is who will pounce first, private equity or a trade buyer. The overwhelming attitude is that a private equity owner would enable some existing staff to jockey for positions, while a strategic partner or trade buyer would install their own team.

For Inman, who has been in the job a month, depending on what transpires, she could end up being one of the shortest-reigning CEOs in listed-company history.

Investors are not surprised chairman Ted Kunkel will step down between now and the next annual meeting, given he signed off on the acquisition of hundreds of retail stores that are now being closed, as well as the sale of a 51.5 per cent stake in one of the company's best assets, accessories brand Nixon.

However, when put into context of what has gone on in the past six months it is no surprise.

For starters it has removed a chief executive, had a profit downgrade, issued an equity raising and knocked back a private equity offer at what was more than triple the current share price.

The company and Gordon has a lot of soul searching to do between now and a takeover, but one thing is certain: Billabong will never be the same again.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Billabong's share price fell sharply after a series of profit downgrades, liquidity and debt concerns, and what the article calls an ill-judged strategy. The company announced a $225 million equity raising at $1.02 a share to shore up the balance sheet, which diluted existing holders and signalled financial stress — a key reason the stock slipped below $1 after trading near $17 five years ago.

Gordon Merchant is Billabong’s founder, a major shareholder and director. According to the article his wealth tied up in the company has fallen from about $630 million five years ago to less than $40 million today. He didn’t take up his full allocation in the recent capital raising, reportedly blocked a prior $3.30 per share offer from TPG in February using his stake, and has been largely absent from recent board activity.

The article says speculation is strong that either private equity or a trade buyer could step in within two to four weeks. Names being touted include private equity firms TPG, KKR and Archer, and strategic trade buyers such as Nike and French group PPR, plus a wealthy family company — but these are reported possibilities, not confirmed deals.

The article notes that a private equity owner would likely let some existing staff compete for roles, potentially keeping more of the current team, whereas a strategic trade buyer (an industry acquirer) would be more likely to install their own management and reshape the business to fit their strategy.

Launa Inman was appointed CEO just a month before the article was published, and investors and some staff were sceptical that she had the right skill set to fix the company’s problems. Sources quoted the article saying staff were questioning her appointment as she learns the different brands, and there’s even a suggestion she could be one of the shortest-reigning CEOs depending on takeover developments.

Yes — the article reports that falling share prices, a profit downgrade and the shock equity raising have enraged some investors to the point where a few are contemplating a class action against the company.

The article cites a dysfunctional board and a series of contentious decisions: signing off on hundreds of retail store acquisitions that are being closed, selling 51.5% of accessories brand Nixon, removing a prior CEO, issuing profit downgrades and rejecting a higher private equity offer earlier in the year. These moves, combined with liquidity and debt fears, have undermined credibility and staff morale.

Investors should watch for any takeover approaches or formal bids (private equity or trade buyers), updates on the $225 million capital raising and future profit guidance, board or management changes (including potential resignations), and any legal actions from shareholders. These developments will be key to how the company’s recovery or sale progresses.