InvestSMART

Superannuation funds scoop up record $18b in fee grab

Australians paid a record $18.6 billion in fees to their superannuation fund over the year to June, about four times the amount households pay in bank fees.
By · 7 Aug 2013
By ·
7 Aug 2013
comments Comments
Australians paid a record $18.6 billion in fees to their superannuation fund over the year to June, about four times the amount households pay in bank fees.

With retail funds charging about 2 per cent in fees, and industry funds about 1 per cent, this means the average Australian paid about $2300 in super fees in the 2013 financial year, according to a report by super fund research body Rainmaker.

Rainmaker's report has found there was no relationship between fees and investment returns, and warned as members' account balances get larger, the impact of fees becomes more significant.

Rainmaker's 2013 super fund fee survey, obtained exclusively by BusinessDay, estimates that costs in the compulsory super system equate to 1.23 per cent of super funds under management, equivalent to $18.6 billion a year.

While the 1.23 per cent figure is lower than the 1.31 per cent charged across the superannuation system in 2007, Rainmaker said the decline was not driven by falling fund prices but the drift from "higher-fee retail funds to lower-fee not-for-profit and self-managed super funds."

Superannuation had a bumper year 2013, with the average balanced fund returning 15.6 per cent, and the industry is expected to swell as the compulsory super guarantee rises to 12 per cent.

The $1.6 trillion sector has also had some political wins, with Labor recently pledging to quarantine super from changes for five years if it wins the election and the Coalition promising to do no harm during the next Parliament.

"Members are paying maximum fees at retirement when their balances are the highest they will ever be - which explains why so many super fund groups want to run retirement funds and also why so many members are tempted to jump across to set up and run their own self-managed super funds," said Rainmaker director of research Alex Dunnin.

Self-managed super funds were found to be the cheapest fund to run, but require larger balances.

The report said a member joining the workforce at age 25 on an annual salary of $40,000 would be conservatively expected to accumulate a retirement nest egg of $500,000.

This is $100,000 more than the same person would be expected to accumulate under a high-fee fund, the report said.

"Reminding fund members that if they pay higher fees they need to either contribute more or earn higher returns to reclaim this opportunity cost ... otherwise their money will run out about a decade earlier".

The survey sample covered $919 million in funds under management and nearly 26 million accounts.

A recent Reserve Bank survey found that households paid $4.1 billion in bank fees in 2012, a fall of 0.3 per cent. But combined with $7.3 billion in bank fee income from businesses, banks collected $11.4 billion in bank fees that year, an increase of 4.3 per cent.

The cost of super tax concessions was in the spotlight earlier this year, with the industry disputing Treasury's estimates they cost $32 billion a year, rising to $45 billion in 2015.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

According to Rainmaker's 2013 survey, Australians paid a record $18.6 billion in superannuation fees in the year to June, which Rainmaker estimates is equivalent to about 1.23% of funds under management.

The report found retail super funds were charging about 2% in fees while industry (not-for-profit) funds charged about 1%, with the average Australian paying roughly $2,300 in super fees in the 2013 financial year.

Rainmaker's analysis found no relationship between higher fees and higher investment returns, so paying more in fees doesn't automatically deliver better investment performance.

Fees become more significant as account balances grow: Rainmaker gives an example that someone starting work at 25 on a $40,000 salary could conservatively accumulate about $500,000 — roughly $100,000 more than they'd likely have under a high‑fee fund. In short, higher fees mean you may need to contribute more or earn higher returns, otherwise your savings could run out around a decade earlier.

The report found SMSFs were the cheapest type of fund to run on a percentage basis, but they generally require larger account balances to be cost‑effective, which is why they're more suitable for members with higher balances.

Super had a bumper year in 2013, with the average balanced fund returning about 15.6%. Rainmaker said the modest fall in overall fee levels (from 1.31% in 2007 to 1.23%) was driven more by a shift from higher‑fee retail funds to lower‑fee not‑for‑profit and SMSF options than by falling fund prices.

The article notes bipartisan attention on super: Labor pledged to quarantine super from changes for five years if elected, while the Coalition promised to 'do no harm' to superannuation during the next Parliament — both examples of political commitments that aim to provide stability for the sector.

The sector is large — around $1.6 trillion — and the cost of super tax concessions has been in the spotlight: Treasury estimated concessions cost about $32 billion a year, rising to $45 billion by 2015, though the industry has disputed those estimates.