InvestSMART

Super blow hurts councils

VICTORIAN councils, water authorities, libraries and other agencies are facing a bill of more than half a billion dollars to top up a superannuation scheme for current and former staff and to pay associated tax obligations.
By · 3 Aug 2012
By ·
3 Aug 2012
comments Comments
VICTORIAN councils, water authorities, libraries and other agencies are facing a bill of more than half a billion dollars to top up a superannuation scheme for current and former staff and to pay associated tax obligations.

Some councils expressed anger and surprise yesterday after receiving news of the hit, which will put further pressure on rates and services.

They must contribute the money to meet a shortfall in a "defined benefit" scheme for staff that was closed to new members in 1993.

For individual Victorian councils, the shortfalls range from around $20 million down to "very low" figures, the chief executive of the Municipal Association of Victoria, Rob Spence, told The Age.

Across the state, the total shortfall for councils is $396.9 million, while the figure for all state authorities is $453 million. But the impost rises beyond half a billion dollars when a 15 per cent contributions tax is factored in.

Councils and other agencies are facing the costs because under Commonwealth legislation the scheme known as the Local Authorities Superannuation Fund Defined Benefit Plan must be "fully funded".

Mr Spence said legislation required the scheme "to hold enough funds to meet the retirement benefits owed to members now and into the future. If current assets fall below what's needed to pay current and future benefits, then employers are required to make top-up payments."

Mr Spence called for legislative change, saying that while the federal government had an "unfunded defined benefit liability of around $61 billion", the local government scheme had to be fully funded.

The City of Greater Bendigo faces a hit of $10.3 million, including $1.5 million in contributions tax. Mayor Alec Sandner urged state and federal governments to shield ratepayers from the cost.

"On the ratepayers it is not fair, because they're the ones that have to pay it. And then it's also not fair on the people if we start cutting services," he said.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Victorian councils, water authorities, libraries and other agencies have been told they must contribute more than half a billion dollars to top up a defined benefit superannuation scheme for current and former staff and to meet associated tax obligations. The hit arises because the Local Authorities Superannuation Fund Defined Benefit Plan must be "fully funded" under Commonwealth law, so employers must make top-up payments when assets fall short of liabilities.

The Local Authorities Superannuation Fund Defined Benefit Plan is a closed defined benefit scheme for local government staff (closed to new members in 1993). It provides guaranteed retirement benefits to current and former employees, and legislation requires the scheme to hold enough funds to pay those benefits now and into the future.

Under Commonwealth legislation the scheme must be fully funded. If current assets fall below what's needed to pay current and future benefits, employers — including councils and other state authorities — are legally required to make top-up payments to cover the shortfall.

According to the report, the total shortfall for Victorian councils is about $396.9 million and $453 million for all state authorities. When a 15% contributions tax is added, the impost rises beyond half a billion dollars. Individual council shortfalls range from about $20 million down to very low figures; for example, the City of Greater Bendigo faces a $10.3 million hit (including $1.5 million in contributions tax).

Councils warned the bill will put further pressure on rates and services. Mayors and council leaders have expressed concern that the cost could lead to higher rates for ratepayers or force cuts to local services if governments do not provide relief.

Rob Spence, chief executive of the Municipal Association of Victoria, has called for legislative change, arguing it is unfair that the local government scheme must be fully funded while the federal government has large unfunded defined benefit liabilities. Local leaders such as City of Greater Bendigo Mayor Alec Sandner have urged state and federal governments to shield ratepayers from the cost.

The 15% contributions tax is applied to superannuation top-up contributions, which increases the total bill councils must pay. The article notes that factoring in this tax pushes the overall impost beyond half a billion dollars and cites the City of Greater Bendigo's $1.5 million contributions tax as part of its $10.3 million total hit.

Keep an eye on council budget announcements and consultations, any council statements about rate changes or service adjustments, and responses from state and federal governments about possible relief. The article highlights councils' surprise and calls for legislative change, so follow local media and council updates to see how the shortfalls will be managed locally.