InvestSMART

The article you are trying to access does not exist, however, here are some articles you may be interested in.

Suddenly, boring banks are exciting

As the '90s became the noughties the glowing white Apple became a sine qua non for the cool crowd in cafes and workplaces as Steve Jobs announced a series of devastatingly clever devices.
By · 26 Apr 2013
By ·
26 Apr 2013
comments Comments
As the '90s became the noughties the glowing white Apple became a sine qua non for the cool crowd in cafes and workplaces as Steve Jobs announced a series of devastatingly clever devices.

In the sharemarket, Apple was super-cool, too. It cost less than $US7 to buy an Apple Inc share a decade ago. Even with Apple's shares down from a high of $US702 in mid-September last year to $US405, the 10-year return is almost 6000 per cent.

Here in Australia, however, investors who bought the boring old banks have been the cool ones more recently. It's not an apples-with-apples comparison, but as Westpac, NAB and ANZ prepare to announce March-half profits that will total more than $9 billion, Australian bank shareholders are pretty happy.

Apple's share price return over a decade is one for the ages, but until last year when the group declared a dividend that it has just raised along with plans to boost share buybacks by $US50 billion, the share price gain was all investors got. Australia's banks, on the other hand, are big dividend payers: it is one of the main reasons boring, yield-hungry investors like them.

Apple's 10-year share price gain of about 5750 per cent dwarfs the 66 per cent gain posted by the banks in the S&P/ASX 200 share index over the same period, but Apple's all-in return including dividends is only 1.5 per cent higher.

The ASX 200 banks' 10-year total return - that is, their share price gain plus dividends - is 268 per cent, four times their share price gain.

Over five years, Apple's total return is 139 per cent. Australian bank shares rose by only 38 per cent over the period (they were hammered by the global crisis) but their total return including dividends is 113 per cent.

Then it gets interesting. Over three years, Apple returned 55 per cent of share price gain, and a total return of 57.2 per cent. The Australian banks delivered a 19 per cent share price gain and a 56 per cent total gain, in line with Apple.

Apple's shares are up 15.6 per cent over two years, and by 17.3 per cent including dividends. The Australian banks shares are up 27 per cent, and by 54 per cent including dividends. In the past year Apple's shares are down 29 per cent, or 28 per cent on a total return basis. ASX 200 bank shares are up by 37 per cent, and total return including dividends is 50 per cent.

That's pretty cool performance in this stolid post-crisis environment, and the profits that three of the big four banks announce over the next two weeks shouldn't derail it.

ANZ reports on its March half-year next Tuesday, and is expected to post 7 per cent higher cash earnings of about $3.1 billion. Westpac reports the following Friday, and is expected to boost first-half earnings by the same percentage to $3.4 billion. NAB reports on May 9, and is being tipped to post earnings of $2.89 billion, 2 per cent above its earnings in the March half last year.

Wholesale funding costs should begin to ease from here on, as the funding cost blowout that accompanied the global crisis rolls off the banks' balance sheets. This will improve their profit margins.

How much of the gain is retained and how much is passed on in lower lending rates is uncertain, but it's safe to assume that some of it is going to be "banked." The banks may report an uptick in problem personal loans in the half, but that's a common post-Christmas spending-binge occurrence. They will also observe that lending demand is still weak but, as always, the question will be: compared with what?

Housing credit was growing at an annual rate of 22 per cent in 2004, and did not fall below 10 per cent until the middle of 2008. It was running at 4.4 per cent in February. Business lending growth peaked at an annual rate of 24 per cent at the end of 2007. In February it was running at 3.9 per cent.

Loan growth is a revenue proxy for the banks: lending is what they do. It will not return to double-digit levels, and may stay around current levels for a year or more. That means that revenue growth will be subdued - but it's not the end of the world.

Coles has just reported third-quarter sales growth of 6.4 per cent and been lauded for it, for example. Woolworths increased its third-quarter sales by 2.5 per cent, and Brambles shares are close to their year high after it said this week that third-quarter sales were 4 per cent higher.

There are plenty of groups that get by on single-digit revenue growth. They do so by running their businesses efficiently, and extracting productivity gains to magnify the top-line result.

The banks are in the same place now, and will be for years. But it's a good enough groove to enable them continue to increase dividends that are currently yielding more than twice the Commonwealth 10-year bond. There have been worse places to be than Australia's banks in the past few years: just ask an Apple shareholder.

mmaiden@fairfaxmedia.com.au
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Australian bank shares have been appealing because they pay big dividends and have delivered strong total returns recently. While tech stocks like Apple have had massive long-term price gains, ASX 200 banks have produced solid total returns once dividends are included — and their dividend yields are currently more than twice the Commonwealth 10-year bond, which matters to yield-hungry investors.

The article notes that Apple's 10-year share price gain is roughly 5,750–6,000%, dwarfing the ASX 200 banks' 10-year price gain of 66%. But when dividends are included, ASX 200 banks’ 10-year total return is 268%. Over five years Apple’s total return is 139% vs banks’ 113% (including dividends). Over three years the total returns are almost identical (Apple ~57.2% vs banks ~56%). Over two years and one year, banks outperformed on a total return basis (two-year banks ~54% vs Apple ~17.3%; one-year banks ~50% vs Apple down ~28%).

Yes. The article says three of the big four banks are due to report March-half results over the next two weeks. ANZ is expected to post about $3.1 billion in cash earnings (around 7% higher), Westpac is tipped to report about $3.4 billion (similar ~7% lift), and NAB is expected to post roughly $2.89 billion (about 2% higher than the prior March half).

Wholesale funding costs should begin to ease as the funding-cost blowout from the global crisis rolls off banks' balance sheets. Lower funding costs will help improve banks' profit margins, and some of those gains are likely to be retained by banks rather than fully passed on in lower lending rates.

Loan growth has slowed from the double-digit rates seen in the mid-2000s: housing credit ran at 22% in 2004 and was 4.4% in February, while business lending peaked at 24% in 2007 and was 3.9% in February. The article says loan growth is unlikely to return to double digits and may stay around current levels for a year or more, meaning revenue growth for banks will be subdued but still manageable.

Banks can grow or sustain dividends even with single-digit revenue growth by running their businesses efficiently and extracting productivity gains. The article compares banks to retailers and other groups that manage on single-digit top-line growth by improving efficiency to magnify results — the banks are doing the same, enabling dividend increases.

Dividends are crucial. The article highlights that while Apple's price appreciation has been enormous over the long term, it only began paying a dividend more recently. For Australian banks, dividends make up a large part of investor returns: ASX 200 banks’ 10-year total return (price plus dividends) is 268%, far higher than their 66% price-only gain, showing how dividends materially change the performance picture.

Investors should watch reported cash earnings versus expectations (ANZ, Westpac, NAB figures are highlighted), commentary on wholesale funding costs and whether they are easing, any changes in problem personal loans (often seasonal after holidays), and management guidance on lending demand — especially whether loan growth or margin improvements will be retained or passed to borrowers.