FROM the White House to Australian petrol stations, moves to dump emergency supplies of oil on to global markets were yesterday being felt around the world.
Member nations of the International Energy Agency have agreed to release 60 million barrels of oil from their strategic reserves over the next 30 days in an attempt to ease prices.
Prices soared in the first quarter of this year as political unrest halted oil production in Libya, but
fears of a Greek default and slowing economic data from China have pared back some of those gains this month.
Despite the recent softening in prices, the IEA said the disruption of supply from Libya had forced it to act, and it hoped its move would help nurture the "fragile global economic recovery".
"The threat of a serious market tightening, particularly for some grades of oil, poses an immediate requirement for additional oil or products to be made available to the market," the IEA said.
"The IEA collective action is intended to complement expected increases in output by producing countries to help bridge the gap until sufficient additional oil from them reaches global markets."
Strategic oil stocks are usually reserved for times of national crisis. This week's release is only the third such intervention, following similar moves during the 1991 Gulf War and in the wake of hurricane Katrina in 2005.
The amount of oil released is considered relatively trivial, as it amounts to less than one day's global consumption.
But it was seen as a major symbolic step, particularly after OPEC failed to agree on a deal to increase oil production earlier this month.
News of the release had an instant effect on oil markets, with the American benchmark crude West Texas Intermediate falling by $US4.39 a barrel to $US91.02.
Futures contracts for the European benchmark, Brent, fell by more than 6 per cent.
Both had recovered modestly yesterday evening, as investors digested the short-term nature of the solution.
Australian oil and gas companies watched their share prices suffer on the news, with Woodside Petroleum losing 20? to close at $40.20.
Santos fell 10? to $13.27, Beach Petroleum dipped 1? to 87? and Tap Oil fell 3? to 83.5?.
Alan Cadd, from petrol-focused consumer lobby group MotorMouth, said petrol prices for Australian motorists were influenced by many complex factors, but the oil releases would generally ease pressure at the bowser.
"All things being equal, it will be good news for Australian motorists," he said.
Mr Cadd said the Australian motoring sector often worked to an unofficial rule where a $US1 change in global crude oil prices translated roughly to a 1? change at the bowser.
ANZ analyst Serene Lim said the move would ease prices in the short term but could pose some risks in the longer term.
"At some point the replenishing of strategic stocks should boost demand and pressure prices," she said.
Half the 60 million barrels will be released by the US, equivalent to about 4 per cent of its strategic oil reserves.
Republican politicians in the US accused President Barack Obama of securing a politically popular solution before the American summer holidays, when oil consumption and price pressures traditionally rise.
They said eroding the strategic supplies had threatened national security, and taxpayers might have to pay more to restock.
Oil lobby groups in the US were also angry. Charles Drevna, from the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, attacked the plan. "Releasing oil from the strategic petroleum reserve today, when gasoline prices are falling and there is no supply shortage, makes no sense and weakens our economic and national security," he said.
The Obama administration rejected suggestions the decision was politically motivated, saying the oil releases were simply about responding to "supply disruption".
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What did the IEA strategic reserves release involve and why was 60 million barrels put onto the market?
The International Energy Agency (IEA) member nations agreed to release 60 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves over the next 30 days. The move was intended to ease oil price pressure caused by supply disruptions — notably halted Libyan production — and to help support the fragile global economic recovery while producing countries increase output.
How did global oil prices react after the strategic reserves release?
Markets reacted quickly: the US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) fell by US$4.39 to US$91.02 a barrel and European Brent futures dropped more than 6%. Both benchmarks had recovered modestly later as investors considered the short-term nature of the release.
What does the strategic release mean for Australian petrol prices at the bowser?
According to Alan Cadd of consumer lobby MotorMouth, the oil releases should generally ease pressure on petrol prices for Australian motorists. He noted petrol pricing is influenced by many factors, but the extra supply is likely to be good news for consumers in the short term.
How were Australian oil and gas company shares affected by the oil release?
The announcement hit Australian oil and gas stocks: Woodside Petroleum fell sharply (losing around 20% to close at $40.20) and Santos dropped about 10% to $13.27. Other local players such as Beach Petroleum and Tap Oil also saw share price declines.
Is the 60 million barrels release a large intervention compared with global demand?
No — the released amount is relatively small in global terms. The article notes it amounts to less than one day's global oil consumption. Still, the move was significant symbolically and is only the third IEA collective release after interventions in 1991 and 2005.
How much of the release did the US contribute and what portion of its reserves is that?
The United States is responsible for half of the 60 million barrels being released, which the article says is equivalent to about 4% of its strategic oil reserves.
Could the strategic reserves release create longer-term risks for oil prices or investors?
Yes. ANZ analyst Serene Lim warned the release should ease prices in the short term, but replenishing strategic stocks later could boost demand and place upward pressure on prices over the longer term — a potential risk investors should monitor.
What political and industry reactions followed the decision to release strategic oil stocks?
The move drew criticism from some US Republicans and oil industry lobby groups, who argued it could undermine national security or was politically motivated. The Obama administration rejected those claims, saying the decision was aimed at responding to a real supply disruption.