Smoking gun email lends credence to duress claims
The warring players are mining entrepreneur Paul Willis, Intrepid Mines boss Brad Gordon and legal counsel Vanessa Chidrawi, and their Indonesian joint-venture partners, a couple now well known as simply Maya and Reza.
Willis had long claimed he was forced to sign away his stake in the venture under duress by a host of armed Indonesian thugs. Intrepid, formerly called Emperor Mines, had long denied it. The matter is before a court in Jakarta.
And now, in this most extraordinary story of corporate intrigue, an email has surfaced, from Intrepid's legal counsel Chidrawi to chief executive Gordon and Maya Ambarsari and Reza Nazaruddin in 2008, that supports Willis' dramatic allegation that Intrepid conspired with Maya and Reza to force him out of the project.
In the email of April 21, 2008, which can be viewed online today, Chidrawi discusses co-opting the Indonesian police in a plan to get Willis to sign a "termination agreement". If Willis is not willing to sign, she writes, Maya and Reza will "pursue all courses of action open to them - civil, criminal and administrative, in Indonesia".
Where Intrepid's and Willis' stories mostly diverge is on two counts: whether there was duress, and whether Willis had wrongly gone behind Intrepid's back to do a deal with another potential miner, Bumi.
Willis says he was forced to sign the termination agreement due to the threat by Indonesian heavies with guns.
Further, he says that an alliance agreement between himself, Intrepid and Maya and Reza had elapsed on March 31, so Intrepid had no rights to the project when they conspired to force him to sign the releases three weeks later. Intrepid, however, says Willis was in breach of his fiduciary duties by trying to cut it out of the project and bring in Bumi.
As to the armed thugs, Intrepid concedes there may have been bodyguards present when Willis signed his releases and walked away for $2.5 million but denies there was duress. In any case, the bodyguards belonged to Maya and Reza and were not Intrepid's idea.
The supreme irony in this feud over the 23 million ounce gold deposit is that last year, some four years after squeezing Mr Willis out of the picture, Maya and Reza then squeezed out Intrepid itself.
Intrepid's shares tanked last year on the bad news that it had been locked out of the Tujuh Bukit project. Things got even worse. Maya and Reza, the controllers of the PT IMN joint venture, later transferred ownership of Intrepid's 80 per cent stake to another vehicle, PT Bumi Sukses Indo (BSI).
BSI shareholders include two of Indonesia's richest men, Edwin Soeryadjaya and Garibaldi Thohir, along with Singapore hedge fund Provident Capital Partners.
Intrepid told the ASX in December that it remained legally entitled to 80 per cent of the project. "Intrepid further asserts that it is the victim of an attempt at criminal fraud that is now under investigation by Indonesian police."
Willis brought a case in the Jakarta courts last month claiming $250 million compensation for being forced out of the joint venture.
Intrepid did not turn up to the court hearing, instead writing to shareholders to say that the action was baseless. However, Intrepid said it would be present for the next scheduled court hearing in May.
Willis says that if he can prove duress - and the email helps his case - then he is able to both claim for damages and claim that the agreements that Intrepid signed with the Indonesians the following day can be declared null and void in Indonesia.
"The basis to declare as null and void is the term 'an unlawful act' and the discretion of the court to deal with direct products of unlawful acts, that is agreements signed so soon after the alleged duress/intimidation," he said last week.
For its part Intrepid has taken action in a court of arbitration in Singapore to establish its rights over the project.
Any finding in Singapore is not enforceable in Indonesia, but it may force the new owners of Tujuh Bukit to the negotiating table.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
Tujuh Bukit is a jumbo gold and copper deposit on Java (reported as about a 23 million ounce gold deposit). Key parties named in the article are mining entrepreneur Paul Willis; Intrepid Mines (formerly Emperor Mines) and its CEO Brad Gordon; Intrepid’s legal counsel Vanessa Chidrawi; Indonesian joint‑venture partners known as Maya and Reza; and the vehicle PT Bumi Sukses Indo (BSI), whose shareholders include Edwin Soeryadjaya, Garibaldi Thohir and Singapore hedge fund Provident Capital Partners.
The article describes an April 21, 2008 email from Intrepid’s legal counsel Vanessa Chidrawi to CEO Brad Gordon and the Indonesian partners that discusses co‑opting the Indonesian police as part of a plan to get Paul Willis to sign a 'termination agreement.' That email lends support to Willis’s allegation that he was forced out under duress and is therefore important evidence in his Jakarta court case.
Willis says he was forced to sign releases under threat from armed Indonesian bodyguards and that an earlier alliance had already elapsed on March 31, 2008, meaning Intrepid had no rights when he was pressured three weeks later. He has lodged a claim in the Jakarta courts seeking US$250 million in compensation. The article also notes Willis walked away at the time for US$2.5 million.
Intrepid denies Willis’s duress claim, accepts there may have been bodyguards present (which it says belonged to Maya and Reza), and contends Willis breached fiduciary duties by negotiating with another potential miner, Bumi. Intrepid has told shareholders it remains legally entitled to 80% of the project, says it is the victim of an attempted criminal fraud now under investigation by Indonesian police, and has taken arbitration action in Singapore to establish its rights.
According to the article, Intrepid was locked out of the Tujuh Bukit project and its shares tanked last year on that news. The Indonesian controllers Maya and Reza later transferred ownership of Intrepid’s 80% stake in the joint venture to PT Bumi Sukses Indo (BSI).
Willis has filed a US$250 million case in the Jakarta courts alleging duress and seeking damages and a declaration that later agreements are null and void. Intrepid has started arbitration in Singapore to assert its rights. The article notes a Singapore arbitration finding is not enforceable in Indonesia but could push the new owners toward negotiation, while Indonesian courts and police investigations will determine enforceability locally.
The dispute highlights sovereign risk — the risk that political, legal and local factors in a country can materially affect investments. In this case investors face contested property rights, allegations of coerced agreements involving local actors and police, cross‑jurisdictional legal fights (Jakarta courts vs Singapore arbitration) and investigations by Indonesian authorities, all of which can disrupt project value and share prices.
Investors should monitor the Jakarta court timetable (the article says Intrepid planned to attend the next scheduled hearing in May), any findings from the Jakarta proceedings on duress and Willis’s US$250 million claim, the outcome of Intrepid’s Singapore arbitration, and any developments from the Indonesian police investigation. These events will influence whether agreements are declared void, whether negotiations occur, and potential impacts on the companies’ valuations.
Call 1300 880 160
Start a chat
Schedule a call
