Self-managed super funds seek safety of cash: report

Volatile economic conditions have seen a retreat from the sharemarket and lowered expectations of retirement income, writes Annette Sampson.

Volatile economic conditions have seen a retreat from the sharemarket and lowered expectations of retirement income, writes Annette Sampson.

THE uncertain economy has taken its toll on Australia's self-managed super funds, with confidence levels plummeting, investment returns down, and a growing tendency to hoard cash rather than risk the vagaries of the sharemarket.

The latest Intimate with Self-Managed Superannuation report by Russell Investments and the SMSF Professionals Association of Australia found that while Tax Office figures show self-managed funds performed better than public funds from 2007 and 2009, the proportion of trustees who feel very confident they will achieve retirement income targets has halved, from 34 per cent of trustees surveyed in 2010 to 17 per cent in 2011.

The international investment climate has put managing risk at the top of the priority list for trustees, overtaking costs and returns. The proportion of trustees who now regard shares as too volatile has doubled to one third this year and self-managed funds are building a growing "wall of cash" as part of their risk reduction.

"SMSFs have long held strong cash holdings, mainly due to the fact many hold investments outside of super and for income payment requirements," said Russell Investments managing director for retail Patricia Curtin.

"But there has been an interesting debate as to whether they have been holding or hoarding cash. What we're seeing now is more hoarding through disillusionment with the cult of equities, which has more than doubled year on year. It's not surprising trustees are going back to cash."

Ms Curtin said the survey found continuing uncertainty over government changes to super was also worrying trustees. Just under a quarter of those surveyed said they were "very confident" in the super system though opinions were split on whether the tax benefits outweighed the potential risks.

The survey found some legislative changes were already impacting on trustees' willingness or ability to save. Around 40 per cent said they would have contributed more to super if the caps on contributions had been higher, with average additional savings of almost $65,000. Advisers surveyed said they also expected contributions to fall if the government bans off-market transfers of assets.

Women, the survey found, are suffering a greater crisis of confidence with 42 per cent of trustees (and almost 65 per cent of non-trustees surveyed) anxious they would fall short of their retirement income targets. Ms Curtin said this was despite the fact that women generally believed they would need less money in retirement than men.

The survey, conducted last September/October by research company CoreData, interviewed 1406 consumers, of whom 337 had self-managed funds. It also included an eight-trustee focus group and a survey of 513 fund advisers.

Want access to our latest research and new buy ideas?

Start a free 15 day trial and gain access to our research, recommendations and market-beating model portfolios.

Sign up for free

Join the Conversation...

There are comments posted so far.

If you'd like to join this conversation, please login or sign up here

Related Articles