InvestSMART

Rio: our mistake over Alcan

Rio Tinto has offered its shareholders a clear mea culpa over its infamous 2007 takeover of aluminium producer Alcan, but urged them to not overlook the good work being undertaken at the company.
By · 20 Apr 2013
By ·
20 Apr 2013
comments Comments
Rio Tinto has offered its shareholders a clear mea culpa over its infamous 2007 takeover of aluminium producer Alcan, but urged them to not overlook the good work being undertaken at the company.

Addressing the annual meeting of Rio's London shareholders, chairman Jan du Plessis delivered some of the clearest comments to date on the Alcan purchase, which has prompted more than $US27 billion worth of impairments over the past four years and helped end the tenure of former chief executive Tom Albanese.

"In hindsight, this project was not only badly timed at the top of the market, but major structural changes over the last year or two have put the global aluminium industry under tremendous pressure," he said.

"In retrospect, we therefore have to acknowledge that the acquisition has had a significant negative impact on shareholder value and, as our owners, you have every right to expect that we do better."

But Mr du Plessis said angry shareholders should not forget the strong performance that has been achieved in other divisions, particularly iron ore.

"It is important that we retain a balanced perspective of your company's overall performance over the period of almost six years since the acquisition was first announced," he said.

The $US14.4 billion worth of impairments reported by Rio Tinto earlier this year was a hot topic among the hostile group of London shareholders, and no doubt helped inform their votes on a motion to alter the system for awarding long-term bonuses to executives.

The motion was designed to make it easier for the company to claw back bonuses paid to executives and to force executives to own more Rio Tinto shares.

Voting results from the London meeting have been kept private until after Rio's Australian shareholders have their chance to vote at the annual meeting in Sydney on May 9.

Arguably the biggest priority for the company this year is to bring Mongolia's Oyu Tolgoi mine into commercial production.

That is supposed to occur by June, but that schedule has been threatened by a disagreement between Rio and the Mongolian government over the cost of the project and the royalty rate.

Mongolia's Finance Minister, Chultem Ulann, said his government was conducting an audit on Rio's spending on the project, including on equipment and other aspects of the mining process.

"We are checking procurement documents and expenditures,"

he said. "No one understands

why the project has gone

$2 billion over budget so we are checking this."

The Mongolian government believes Rio has outstanding tax debts from 2012, and a World Bank audit of Mongolia's 2013 budget revealed the developing nation has already factored in $303 million worth of extra cash flows from Oyu Tolgoi that are still in dispute.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Rio Tinto’s chairman Jan du Plessis issued a mea culpa, saying the 2007 takeover of aluminium producer Alcan was badly timed and has had a significant negative impact on shareholder value. The deal has resulted in large write-downs, with around US$27 billion of impairments over the past four years and US$14.4 billion of impairments reported earlier this year.

The costly Alcan acquisition contributed to governance and performance pressure at Rio Tinto, and helped end the tenure of former CEO Tom Albanese. The company has faced criticism from shareholders and is being pushed on accountability and executive incentives as a result.

Yes. Rio Tinto’s chairman stressed investors should keep a balanced view of the company’s overall performance, noting particularly strong results in other divisions such as iron ore, even as the aluminium acquisition underperformed.

Shareholders voted on a motion to alter the long‑term bonus system to make it easier for the company to claw back bonuses and to require executives to hold more Rio Tinto shares. Voting outcomes from the London meeting were held back until Australian shareholders vote at the Sydney meeting on May 9.

Oyu Tolgoi is a major project Rio Tinto aims to bring into commercial production—targeted for June—and is described as one of the company’s biggest priorities for the year. Its successful start-up could materially affect Rio Tinto’s future cash flows and performance.

A disagreement with the Mongolian government over project costs and the royalty rate has threatened the June start date. Mongolia is auditing Rio’s spending, checking procurement and expenditures, and says the project is about US$2 billion over budget. These disputes could delay production and impact projected cash flows.

Yes. The Mongolian government believes Rio Tinto has outstanding tax debts from 2012. A World Bank audit of Mongolia’s 2013 budget showed the country has already factored in US$303 million of extra cash flows from Oyu Tolgoi that remain in dispute.

Investors should watch developments on Oyu Tolgoi (including whether the June commercial production target holds), the outcome of shareholder votes on executive pay, any further impairment announcements, and updates from the Mongolian audit and tax discussions—each could influence Rio Tinto’s cash flow outlook and shareholder value.