Residents could be in a bind with aged-care reform bills
Under the current system a distinction is made between low-care and high-care residents. The residents of high-care facilities require daily help with such activities as feeding, dressing, washing and mobility. Currently residents entering high-care facilities do not pay an accommodation bond; they only pay daily care fees.
In low-care facilities residents look after themselves and, in addition to paying daily fees, they can also be required to pay an accommodation bond. The amount of accommodation bond is negotiated between the resident and low-care provider. The amount of age-care bond payable is based on the Centrelink assets test.
The assets counted by Centrelink include all assets owned by a person or couple, including their home and financial assets such as superannuation. The amount of bond payable depends on the bargaining position of the residents. Where the retirement village is in a strong position, new residents can be forced to sell their home and cash in all their financial investments, including superannuation, and be left with only $41,500.
The new bills introduced contain nothing that would reduce the maximum amount a retirement facility can take. Most of the amendments deal with changing the name of the amount deposited with a facility from that of a "bond" to an "accommodation payment".
The most concerning aspect of the reforms will be the removal of the distinction between low care and high care. If the legislation is passed in its current form high and low-care residents will both pay a means-tested daily care fee. These fees will be indexed and are currently capped at $25,000 a year, with a lifetime limit of $60,000.
With there being no distinction between low and high-care facilities new residents of both will be required to make an accommodation payment. This will be fully refundable, with no amount retained by the aged-care facility. Until the legislation is passed by Parliament, exactly how the new system will work is unclear.
Amounts deposited with aged-care facilities are used to produce income, often in the form of interest, which provides funding for the upkeep and development of the facilities. In most cases the current bond is paid as a lump sum on entering the facility. There will be the ability for the accommodation payment to be paid as a lump sum, periodic interest-only payments or a combination of a smaller lump sum and a series of periodic payments.
Despite what some aged-care providers might say, there is no requirement for a resident of a facility to be left with only the current minimum level of assets of $41,500. The amount of bond or accommodation payment taken by a facility is totally negotiable. The problem is as demand for these facilities increase, the negotiating power of residents could diminish.
The introduction of home care as a new option for people requiring some care and help should provide an alternative. Home-care recipients will be asked to pay a basic daily fee based on the single basic age pension rate. This fee will be capped at $5000 or $10,000 a year, depending on a resident's income, with a lifetime cap of $60,000 that will be indexed.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The bills shift focus toward home care, rename the current 'bond' to an 'accommodation payment', remove the legal distinction between low‑care and high‑care residents (meaning both groups would pay means‑tested daily care fees), and leave unchanged the maximum amount a retirement facility can seek as an accommodation payment. Exact operational details remain unclear until Parliament passes the legislation.
Under the proposed changes new residents of both low‑care and high‑care facilities would be required to make an accommodation payment. The accommodation payment is described as fully refundable (with no amount retained by the facility). It can be paid as a lump sum, periodic interest‑only payments, or a combination of a smaller lump sum plus periodic payments.
Yes. The bills would require means‑tested daily care fees for both former low‑care and high‑care residents. Those fees would be indexed and are currently capped at $25,000 per year with a lifetime cap of $60,000. Home‑care recipients face a separate basic daily fee capped at $5,000 or $10,000 per year depending on income, also with a lifetime cap of $60,000.
The amount is based on the Centrelink assets test and negotiated between the resident and the facility. Centrelink counts all assets owned by a person or couple — including the family home and financial assets such as superannuation — when determining how much a resident might pay.
The article says there is no legal requirement that a resident be left with only the minimum asset level of $41,500; the bond or accommodation payment is negotiable. However, where a retirement facility has strong bargaining power and demand is high, new residents may be pressured to sell their home or cash in financial assets (including superannuation), potentially leaving them with only the current minimum level of assets ($41,500).
Amounts deposited with aged‑care facilities are typically used to produce income — often in the form of interest — which helps fund upkeep and development of the facilities. That is part of why facilities accept lump‑sum or periodic accommodation payments.
The reforms state that the accommodation payment will be fully refundable, with no amount retained by the aged‑care facility. That said, the article notes that until the legislation is passed the precise refund arrangements and how the system will work are still unclear.
Expanded home care provides an alternative to moving into a facility and may reduce pressure to pay large accommodation payments. Home‑care recipients will pay a basic daily fee based on the single basic age pension rate, capped at $5,000 or $10,000 a year depending on income, with a lifetime cap of $60,000 (indexed). For everyday investors, this change could influence decisions about whether to retain the family home, access superannuation, or plan cashflow for potential care costs.

