Regulator shelves probe into Crown-Echo cartel allegations
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission launched the inquiry in July after Echo chairman John O'Neill said Mr Packer had promised to keep his casino empire out of Brisbane if Echo promised not to hinder his proposed casino hotel at Barangaroo.
"The ACCC conducted a thorough investigation of the issues and concluded that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that there has been a contravention of the competition laws. On that basis, the ACCC does not intend to take any further action on the matter," the regulator said on Tuesday.
Crown, which denied the allegations at the time, said: "We welcome the announcement from the ACCC today." It would not comment further.
Central to the investigation is an alleged statement from Mr Packer that Crown would stay out of Queensland if Echo "behaved" itself "vis-a-vis Sydney".
The statement was allegedly made during a luncheon on his boat in March this year attended by Crown executive and former Labor minister Mark Arbib, Echo chairman John O'Neill and chief executive John Redmond.
Crown was one of Echo's largest shareholders when the meeting took place, and was proposing to build a luxury hotel casino at Barangaroo. The plan was the VIP gaming operation would either use Echo's casino licence or Crown would gain a casino licence in its own right.
Mr O'Neill made the allegations in July this year to Fairfax Media, soon after the NSW government announced plans to advance Mr Packer's proposal over a rival offer from Echo. The allegations sparked an ACCC inquiry on the grounds the statement might suggest an invitation was being made to collude in the allocation of geographic markets between the two casino operators, the commission said.
Bid rigging (when rivals agree not to genuinely compete for tenders) and market sharing (when rivals agree to divide customers or areas between themselves rather than compete) are banned under competition law. Both actions are considered cartel conduct, and could be subject to criminal penalties, including up to 10 years in jail.
Earlier this month, Crown received final approval for the Barangaroo project, which now has a price tag of nearly $1.5 billion.
This means Echo will lose its monopoly position in Sydney when the exclusivity of its licence ends in 2019. The two companies now face a turf war in Brisbane, with competing plans to build a new casino resort in the city centre where Echo has a casino in need of redevelopment. Echo also owns casinos in Townsville and the Gold Coast.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) dropped the investigation due to insufficient evidence to support the allegations of cartel behavior between Crown Resorts and Echo Entertainment.
The allegations suggested that Crown Resorts and Echo Entertainment were involved in cartel behavior, specifically that Crown would stay out of Queensland if Echo did not hinder Crown's proposed casino hotel at Barangaroo.
Cartel behavior involves practices like bid rigging and market sharing, where competitors agree not to genuinely compete, which is illegal under competition law and can lead to criminal penalties.
The ACCC concluded that there was insufficient evidence of a contravention of competition laws and decided not to take further action against Crown Resorts and Echo Entertainment.
Crown Resorts welcomed the ACCC's announcement to drop the investigation but chose not to comment further on the matter.
With the ACCC's decision, Crown's Barangaroo project, which has a price tag of nearly $1.5 billion, can proceed without the cloud of the investigation, and it will end Echo's monopoly in Sydney when Echo's exclusivity ends in 2019.
Crown and Echo are now facing a competitive situation in Brisbane, with both companies having plans to build new casino resorts in the city center, where Echo currently has a casino in need of redevelopment.
The alleged statement by James Packer suggested that Crown would avoid entering the Queensland market if Echo did not interfere with Crown's Sydney plans, which was central to the ACCC's investigation into potential market-sharing agreements.

