Seven West Media has nowhere near enough debt to be placed in a bank hospital.
THE massive appreciation in Seven West Media's stock over the past couple of days answers, in part, the big question around why its share price has been in the doldrums for six months. The market took the view that there was a risk the company would not be able to refinance its $1.95 billion debt.
It's not the only reason the share price has been trashed, but it is the stupidest one. One can only hope that the fund managers that had been valuing this media stock on the basis of refinancing risk are not managing your super funds.
It is one thing to be operating in uncertain times with sovereign risk producing an economic cloud over Europe and the US. It's also understandable that companies and individuals are debt averse and undertaking a massive deleveraging.
But this company, which is ultimately controlled by billionaire Kerry Stokes, has nowhere near enough debt to be placed in a bank hospital.
Those companies that got themselves into hot water back in 2007 and 2008 when the global financial crisis hit had significantly higher levels of debt, often had convoluted structures, paid dividends out of borrowings or had grossly overpaid for assets.
Seven West Media has none of these characteristics. Its level of borrowing is high relative to the medium to large listed companies in Australia, but it can cover its interest bill three times over out of the cash it generates from operating a group of media assets that are properly valued in the balance sheet. It can even pay down some of this debt using its cash flow.
There are plenty of banks out there wishing there were more Seven West Medias.
The trouble for many banks (in particular the big Australian banks) is that large companies spent two years of the GFC getting rid of debt and are not prepared to take on any more in order to invest in their business.
Companies simply don't need money for capital expenditure because (other than resource stocks) they are nervous about the outlook for the local and international economy.
Fear of double-dip recession in Europe and the US is understandably promoting a level of caution.
Increasingly we are seeing companies undertaking buybacks to trim bloated balance sheets and improve returns on equity. CSL yesterday undertook the new buyback program for $900 million of stock.
This frugal conservatism doesn't work for the cashed-up banks that are looking for customers, both consumer and corporate, to start borrowing again.
It's more likely Seven West would have been bowled over in the rush of banks happy to have a deal.
This overlay of refinancing fear is now no longer a factor weighing on the share price. But it was never the only price anchor.
There is also a level of market mistrust around Stokes a dislike of his corporate restructurings and a nervousness about being a minority shareholder in the listed companies he controls.
The $1.9 billion debt inside Seven West Media is a legacy of one of these related party asset reshuffles. Seven West Media (once West Australian Newspapers) was created in April when the previously undergeared WAN acquired media assets controlled by Stokes and private equity firm KKR.
Last year Stokes's publicly listed media investment company acquired his private Caterpillar equipment operations. This company, now called Seven Group Holdings, together with KKR owns just over 40 per cent of the shares in Seven Media Group.
(Despite this cynicism it must be said that the minority shareholders in both these deals voted to approve them.)
The bigger issue for Seven West Media is that it's the proud owner of a suite of traditional media assets under threat from new media entrants and operating in a lacklustre advertising market. Most other companies in this basket are also seeing their shares slump trading at price earnings multiples so low that they suggest little or no short to medium-term growth.
While Seven West Media has been at the lower end of the price-earnings range, the earnings performance of its Seven Network has been better than its competitors. The print assets of WAN were sluggish but slightly protected from decline, thanks to its monopoly position in the West Australian market.
In terms of the overall media sector, 2011 demonstrated clearly that print was feeling the pain more than television and radio.
But investors appear not to be differentiating. Media stocks are being trashed in the current environment regardless.
But even with these headwinds the assets of Seven West Media have never looked sufficiently troubled that the company would have difficulty servicing the interest payments.
If the share price fell low enough it would be more likely that Stokes would come along and privatise it on the cheap.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What was the refinancing risk facing Seven West Media and is it still a concern for investors?
The market worried Seven West Media might struggle to refinance about $1.9–$1.95 billion of debt, which weighed on its share price. The article says that refinancing fear is now largely off the table: the company isn’t highly geared relative to crisis-era failures, can cover its interest bill roughly three times from operating cash flow, and can even pay down some debt — so refinancing risk is no longer the main concern for investors.
How much debt does Seven West Media have and can the company service that debt?
The company carries roughly $1.9–$1.95 billion of legacy debt. According to the article, Seven West Media can cover its interest payments about three times with cash generated from its media operations and has the capacity to pay down some debt from cash flow, indicating it can service its obligations.
Why did Seven West Media’s share price slump before the recent rebound?
The share price fell for several reasons: investor fear around refinancing the company’s debt, market mistrust of Kerry Stokes’ corporate restructurings and minority-shareholder dynamics, pressure on traditional media from new entrants, and a lacklustre advertising market. The article also notes that the whole media sector has been broadly punished, so investors weren’t differentiating between stronger and weaker media businesses.
Is Seven West Media as risky as the companies that got into trouble during the 2007–08 financial crisis?
No. The article contrasts Seven West Media with the firms that struggled in 2007–08, which typically had much higher leverage, convoluted structures, paid dividends from borrowings or overpaid for assets. Seven West lacks those characteristics and, while its borrowing is significant, it is not of the same perilous scale.
Would banks have been likely to refuse to refinance Seven West Media?
The article suggests the opposite: many banks would have welcomed deals with a company like Seven West Media. It argues that banks are generally keen for good corporate customers, and it’s more likely Seven West would have seen willing lenders rather than being shut out.
How do broader media sector trends affect Seven West Media’s prospects?
Traditional media faces pressure from new media entrants and a weak advertising market. The article notes print has been hit harder than television and radio (with 2011 showing print pain), but Seven West’s Seven Network has performed relatively well compared with some peers. Sector-wide pessimism has pushed down valuations for many media stocks regardless of individual performance.
What role does Kerry Stokes and Seven Group Holdings play in Seven West Media, and why does that matter to investors?
Kerry Stokes ultimately controls the group, and Seven Group Holdings (together with private equity firm KKR) owns just over 40% of Seven West Media. The article says some investors are wary of Stokes’ corporate restructurings and being minority shareholders in companies he controls, which has contributed to market mistrust—though past related-party deals were approved by minority shareholders.
Could Seven West Media be taken private if its share price fell significantly?
Yes. The article suggests that if the share price were to fall low enough, it would be more likely that Kerry Stokes might move to privatise the company, potentially acquiring it on favourable terms.