InvestSMART

Push to ensure more investors grasp key risks

The corporate regulator has admitted Australia's disclosure regime has "inherent weaknesses" that failed to prevent investors losing "a lot of money" on complex financial products.
By · 26 Mar 2013
By ·
26 Mar 2013
comments Comments
The corporate regulator has admitted Australia's disclosure regime has "inherent weaknesses" that failed to prevent investors losing "a lot of money" on complex financial products.

It is considering requiring investors to prove they have a basic level of understanding before they can invest in such products.

Australian Securities and Investments Commission chairman Greg Medcraft said wholesale and retail investors have "lost a lot of money" on complex instruments since 2008. These products include financial derivatives such as "collateralised debt obligations (CDOs)" and "CDOs squared".

Such instruments have been widely criticised for their role in the global financial crisis.

"Wholesale and retail investors were unable to understand or value the risks inherent in these products," Mr Medcraft said.

"Complex products, due to their nature, can be difficult for investors to understand. This can lead to them being mis-sold, particularly when investors are searching for yield." Speaking at the ASIC annual forum in Sydney, Mr Medcraft said the agency was considering ways to regulate such products. This included requiring investors to prove they could understand how the products worked before they invested in them.

"For example, e-learning modules, which explain the key features and risks of a product, could be used to educate potential investors about a product," he said.

"This could overcome the inherent weaknesses in traditional disclosure methods. An online assessment model could then be used to assess the person's understanding before they invest."

ASIC has been heavily criticised in recent years for allowing complex financial instruments, such as CDOs, to be sold to unsophisticated investors.

In November, the Federal Court found in favour of 13 NSW councils in relation to the sale of complex financial instruments.

The councils were awarded more than $20.2 million in compensation and legal costs after the court found they were misled by S&P ratings agency, ABN Amro Bank and Local Government Financial Services about products nicknamed "Rembrandt notes" in the lead-up to the financial crisis. The councils had invested $16 million in the products but lost more than 90¢ in the dollar.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

ASIC admitted Australia's disclosure regime has "inherent weaknesses" that failed to stop investors losing "a lot of money" on complex financial products, and it is considering stronger measures to improve investor protection.

ASIC highlighted complex derivatives such as collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) and CDOs squared — instruments widely criticised for their role in the global financial crisis and for causing losses to investors since 2008.

Both wholesale and retail investors have "lost a lot of money" on complex instruments, with ASIC saying many investors were unable to understand or value the risks inherent in these products.

ASIC is considering requiring investors to demonstrate a basic level of understanding before buying complex products. Options include online education such as e‑learning modules that explain key features and risks and an online assessment model to test understanding before investing.

According to ASIC, e‑learning modules would explain a product’s key features and risks in plain language, and an online assessment could check whether a prospective investor has grasped those risks before they are allowed to invest — potentially overcoming weaknesses in traditional disclosure documents.

The Federal Court found in favour of 13 NSW councils over the sale of complex instruments nicknamed "Rembrandt notes." The councils were awarded more than $20.2 million in compensation and legal costs after being misled, having invested $16 million and lost more than 90 cents in the dollar.

The councils were found to have been misled by the S&P ratings agency, ABN Amro Bank and Local Government Financial Services in relation to the Rembrandt notes sold before the financial crisis.

The article suggests being cautious with products you don't understand, especially when chasing yield. Look for clear explanations of key features and risks, and welcome education tools such as e‑learning modules or online assessments if they are offered before you invest.