IT SEEMED the perfect place to hide a star witness. A sleepy seaside town with tourist trade just busy enough to lose a new face in the street or on the beach.
But there's a problem if the star witness is in love with his own gangster image and insists on collecting his takeaway pizza dressed like Don Corleone.
In a town where cargo pants pass as semi-formal, cashmere overcoats draw attention. In this case, so did the two stone-faced men who seemed to be full-time minders.
Soon, the man who had a secret witness protection codename was the talk of the supermarket and too many locals worked out his real identity.
It didn't help that his name was daubed on a busy road overpass. It was Victoria's worst-kept secret underlining the difficulty police have in "hiding" anyone whose name or face might be known.
Police are increasingly using protected witnesses to spear the big fish of crime. And it is usually a dirty business.
The system is not set up for innocent witnesses good folk who stumble on to a crime and are then willing to do their civic duty. They go to court every day, testify what they have seen and then go home.
Most protected witnesses are criminals offered deals to "give up" bigger prey in the underworld food chain.
One of the most valuable was the robber turned hitman dubbed "The Runner", who worked for the late and lamentable Carl Williams, a drug dealer with delusions of power.
The Runner was an old-school crook who stayed silent until he realised he would spend the rest of his life in jail unless he delivered Williams's head figuratively, at this point.
But when Purana taskforce detectives secretly took him from prison for talks, he realised that Williams had used him. So, over a month, he exposed in detail Williams's involvement in a series of gangland murders.
When asked what he wanted in return, he said he fancied a reduced sentence and a vanilla slice. He got both. It was the first time in Australia a professional hitman was allowed to cut a deal and it proved to be the icing on the cake against Williams. Faced with The Runner's testimony, Williams pleaded guilty to three murders (he was convicted of a fourth) and was sentenced to a minimum of 35 years.
Now police are busy trying to "turn" convicted (or soon to be convicted) offenders with offers they can't refuse.
One convicted murderer has been offered sweeteners including a reduced sentence, an annual subscription to The Age, a signed set of true-crime books and a box of steak knives (to be redeemed outside prison), in exchange for a statement implicating a colourful industrial relations expert and author in a series of murders. The man has declined.
Offers were made to try to turn Carl Williams. He was removed from prison and was allowed to spend time with his father, George, who was also behind bars. Williams, it is said, bragged to select inmates that as an added inducement he had been allowed to spend some quality time in the company of two prostitutes in a motel room.
One of the inmates must have been less than impressed by this as he is the man who allegedly killed Williams with a piece of an exercise bike in Barwon Prison.
Self-motivated informers make for murky waters in criminal cases.
Investigation of the murder of the "vampire" male prostitute Shane Chartres-Abbott began when a career criminal came forward and volunteered that he was the killer.
He didn't have a guilty conscience he just wanted to implicate a serving and a former detective in the case, thereby giving himself some bargaining chips.
The hitman quietly pleaded guilty to the murder in March 2008, confessing he was the shooter and naming his co-offender as Evangelos Goussis. As Goussis is serving life over two underworld hits, he is hardly in a position to argue that his feelings were hurt by the claims.
The killer pleaded guilty but his concurrent sentence meant he was not going to serve any extra jail time. It was a free hit. He is eligible for release in 2023.
The serving and former policemen that the informer named as murder conspirators say he is lying. Investigators believe he is telling a version of the truth.
Meanwhile, the second member of the alleged hit team refuses to talk to police in other words, Goose won't cook anyone. And so the case remains stalled.
Defence lawyers say co-offenders act out of self-interest and embellish (or fabricate) their stories to save their own necks.
Prosecutors say one of the only ways to crack gangland cases is to use the corroborated evidence of insiders.
But the system seems to struggle when the insider is not a co-accused.
Which brings us to the case of Nicola Gobbo the passionate defence lawyer.
Her police critics (and there are many) claim she became personally involved with some of her clients. So it was a shock when it was revealed she had changed sides and worked as a police double agent.
Gobbo wore a tape and recorded former drug squad detective sergeant Paul Dale making possibly incriminating statements over the murder of police informer Terry Hodson, killed at his Kew home, with his wife, in 2004.
Dale was arrested but last month the charge was dropped.
He says he can now get on with his life. Gobbo can't. Her career and her health have been ruined, and her future remains uncertain.
She has been difficult to deal with and has refused to enter witness protection. Police, on the other hand, have failed to show the required flexibility to deal with a vital but high-strung witness.
Now Gobbo is suing police. The case will be ugly unless cooler heads settle it first.
There have been repeated efforts to nobble star witnesses.
Wendy Peirce was the jewel in the Crown case against four men charged with the 1988 Walsh Street murder of police constables Damian Eyre and Steven Tynan until she changed sides at the last minute and derailed the prosecution case.
Gangster Alphonse Gangitano paid for two witnesses to skip the country when they implicated him in the 1995 murder of Greg Workman. The case against him was withdrawn.
But sometimes karma has the last word.
There was the murder suspect who jumped on the same tram as two witnesses he had seen talking to police. He took them to a safe house where he threatened and intimidated them into changing their stories.
The case collapsed and the suspect headed to the warmer climes of northern NSW a free man.
Then one day his modest tin dinghy sank after allegedly striking a giant sea turtle. His body was found floating agonisingly close to a buoy that should have offered him some chance of survival.
Which proves that while justice may be slow, it is sometimes hidden just below the surface.
And it has a hard shell.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What is a protected witness and why do police use protected witnesses in gangland cases?
A protected witness (or police informant) is someone whose identity or testimony is shielded so they can testify against bigger criminals. The article explains police increasingly rely on protected witnesses — often convicted offenders offered deals — because insider evidence can be one of the few ways to crack complex gangland cases.
Who was “The Runner” and how did his testimony help convict Carl Williams?
“The Runner” was a robber-turned-hitman who agreed to give detailed testimony about Carl Williams’ involvement in several gangland murders. In exchange for a reduced sentence (and a lighter request of a vanilla slice), he provided evidence that led Williams to plead guilty to multiple murders and receive a long minimum sentence.
Are protected witnesses reliable — can defence lawyers challenge their credibility?
The article notes the reliability of protected witnesses is contested: defence lawyers say co-offenders often embellish or fabricate stories to save themselves, while prosecutors argue corroborated insider evidence is sometimes essential to prosecute major offenders. In short, credibility can be a major legal battleground.
What kinds of deals or ‘sweeteners’ are offered to turn criminals into police witnesses?
Examples in the article include reduced prison sentences, small comforts or perks (one informant requested a vanilla slice), and unusual offers like a newspaper subscription, signed books, or even a box of steak knives redeemable after release. The article also mentions more significant inducements such as escorted meetings outside prison.
What risks do protected witnesses face and how effective is witness protection?
The article highlights major risks: it can be hard to hide high-profile witnesses (their appearance or behaviour can attract attention), some refuse formal witness protection, and star witnesses have been targeted, threatened or bribed — sometimes derailing prosecutions. Overall, witness protection is portrayed as imperfect and difficult to manage.
Who is Nicola Gobbo and why is her case significant in discussions about police informants?
Nicola Gobbo was a defence lawyer who secretly acted as a police double agent, recording conversations with a former detective. Her actions caused intense controversy: the taped material led to charges that were later dropped, her career and health were said to be ruined, she refused witness protection, and she is now suing police. Her case highlights ethical and practical problems with using insiders who have conflicted roles.
How can the use of criminal informants and protected witnesses affect the outcome of prosecutions?
According to the article, informants can both make and break cases: well-handled insider testimony has led to convictions of major criminals, but self-motivated informers or compromised witnesses can derail prosecutions, produce muddled evidence, or prompt allegations of misconduct that complicate trials.
Does the article suggest any solutions or changes to how police handle protected witnesses?
The article doesn’t prescribe detailed reforms but does highlight shortcomings — such as police failing to show the flexibility needed for high-strung but vital witnesses, and the need for cooler heads to settle disputes (for example, in Nicola Gobbo’s case). It presents the system as a ‘dirty business’ that struggles when insiders aren’t co-accused and when protections are inadequate.